SixesAlltheway
Ancient Mariner
Motherfucking Bolt Thrower.
Are you actually saying you've somehow missed Accept back in the day?Never heard U.D.O. before, and I was shocked by how much I liked the music and songwriting — a nice blend of sweet 80s riffage and power metal sensibilities, infused with the heart of Maiden, Priest, Gamma Ray, and a dash of George Lynch. The songs have light and shade and consistently strong guitar solos — but then the singer comes along and leaves a gigantic skid mark across the entire affair. Holy shit, does this guy sound awful! I might actually prefer a few extreme vocalists to this unmitigated disaster of a vocal performance.
Well we know @Night Prowler has no respect for GMAC norms, based on his hideous Pink Floyd nomination.
I was vaguely aware of the song “Balls To The Wall” at the time and dismissed it as trash.Are you actually saying you've somehow missed Accept back in the day?
Because Accept are / were huge. Not my faves but I’m shocked you never heard of Udo Dirkschneider before. I learned of him shortly after I got into metal, and Accept even before that.I was vaguely aware of the song “Balls To The Wall” at the time and dismissed it as trash.
Also, not sure why @Diesel 11 is liking your post when he wasn’t even alive when any of this happened...?
I'm so sorry to hear it @Jer.I was vaguely aware of the song “Balls To The Wall” at the time and dismissed it as trash.
Also, not sure why @Diesel 11 is liking your post when he wasn’t even alive when any of this happened...?
Oooh, revenge, good call.ACoS didn't kill Sabbat
I’ve heard of Udo Dirkschneider before. I’ve heard of Accept before. They were not huge in the U.S. at the time, at least not in my experience. I was only vaguely aware of their existence at the time, like I said. Why you think I should have been more aware of them back then when you weren’t even alive yet and don’t really know what the U.S. scene was like at the time except through other people’s accounts is strange to me.Because Accept are / were huge. Not my faves but I’m shocked you never heard of Udo Dirkschneider before. I learned of him shortly after I got into metal, and Accept even before that.
All the matches are at 10:6 now, favoring the side I voted for. Only the last match is 9:6 because Kid couldn't vote against ACOS...
Part of my personal problem with a lot of 80's/90's prog-metal epics (including the ever-beloved Divine Wings of Tragedy or A Change of Seasons) is that the music doesn't really progress much - it's more of a hodgepodge mess of ideas strung together, sometimes with the overall intention to make them escalate the tension within the song logically, sometimes not (the "tripping the light fantastic" should - by the internal logic - be the climax of ACOS, near its end, like for example the "Triumphant, champion of Ithaca" part of The Odyssey ... but you get another almost ten minutes after that) and Metropolis is definitely an example of that. It sounds great, the individual parts are nice and I can respect it, just as I respect Outcry (which - as its "follower" - has similar completely nonsensical wankery section which is just so great to listen to), but as a whole it just can't work as one of the bests.
For all the talk about how... e.g. Endless Sacrifice makes no sense with random noodlings in the middle, it's actually the complete opposite - even in the instrumental part almost every individual passage logically grows out of / reacts to the previous one which is very well noticeable especially if you concentrate on the backing riffs and such - with all of it culminating in that "All you've forsaken" part and the final chorus, which brings an emotional catharsis. It has many times over been decried as an example of DT "wankery" getting in their songwriting, but it's actually a particularly well-written song, including the "wanking" parts.
Even some of the other latter DT epics, like Count of Tuscany or ITPOE, which both do have parts that shift gears rather abruptly, it still makes much more of a cohesive whole, allowing for familiarity, playing with motives (in different instrumentation even) and in general working really well; much of the early stuff is indeed hard to remember - so kudos to them for being able to play it live - but not particularly substantial, methinks.
And, like, Scarred is just a wreck in that regard.
TrueWish You Were Here is such an amazing album that it’s hard not to vote for it over lesser albums
But the fact that it also features a live part with nothing more than cover versions really rubs me the wrong way
Imagine that, I was less aware of things in my early teens without the internet than I am in my 40s with the internet. The weirdness just keeps multiplying!How such a well-versed, metal afficionado would be limited in his knowledge by merely what was popular in the notoriously fickle US market at the time is just as strange to me, but I guess we live in a very strange world, indeed.
Have you read the last phrase? Even though I would have taken it in account It would've altered nothing... although I like ACOS (both the song and live covers) it would've never stand a change of getting my vote ahead of SOWN. BTW once again I must stress I like the record but the guitar riff on Angel Of Death's bridge alone blasts the whole thing out the room.Honestly, I don't get this. I always understood it as an EP with bonus live tracks, 'cause DT does covers as bonuses. The main, significant stuff is obvious and if they actually brought a single person to Funeral for a Friend/Love Lies Bleeding with this move, all the more applause to them.
It's even classified as an EP. So I always understood it more as "okay, here's our new EP, but we'll give you more material, just because". How can you hold this against them, really?
No, honestly, not just blind fanboyism speaking. How?