Nothing makes your point quite as well as stealing trainers.
Immigrants out, local trainers for local people!
Seriously, Dubliners probably stab other Dubliners on a daily basis but as soon as Johnny Foreigner gets in on the action its time to burn a fuckin tram. Absolute cretins.
You generally vote for the party itself though, rather than for an individual person, whether you get to write in or circle a name or not. They are carried by, and carry, the platform. To have a bunch of mavericks not bound by policy voted on in the party congress, now that's disgraceful, and to be frank, it would open for substantial lobbying, dark influence, blackmail and corruption.Still the representatives are elected people they represent their electorate I find this kind of disgraceful for a democracy.
In Greece most of the times we have one party government. But still it’s very, very, common Prime Minister to call for “party discipline” which is either you vote for the x law, or else you maybe even ousted from the party.
I wonder if in other European countries there are similar behaviors.
Well, that's really just a question of whether you want the lobbying, dark influence, blackmail, and corruption to happen at the party leadership level or at the individual representative level, isn't it?To have a bunch of mavericks not bound by policy voted on in the party congress, now that's disgraceful, and to be frank, it would open for substantial lobbying, dark influence, blackmail and corruption.
Well, that's really just a question of whether you want the lobbying, dark influence, blackmail, and corruption to happen at the party leadership level or at the individual representative level, isn't it?
Although there are party whips in the UK that try and keep the different MPs following the party discipline, it is not unheard of MPs to vote against the official party line.
Yeah, I don't think there's any formal mechanism for expelling a person from a political party in the U.S. They can primary you, or choose not to spend party money to support your campaign, or if you're already a representative they can kick you out of their caucus so you can't vote for leadership positions or get committee assignments from their party, but they can't formally strip you of the party label AFAIK.I never heard a congressman in the US to be openly expelled because he didn’t vote for this or that.
I certainly wouldn't want a dozen Kirsten Sinemas's in the Swedish parliament, that's for sure. When the former government here had one single parliament seat advantage, a single (ousted party maverick) representative forced hardline concessions from the rest of the majority coalition until the end of her term. That's not what the norm should be.Well, that's really just a question of whether you want the lobbying, dark influence, blackmail, and corruption to happen at the party leadership level or at the individual representative level, isn't it?
It's inconvenient for a party with a slim majority, especially if the maverick is an extremist -- but if the maverick is a centrist, then it can help to prevent a tyranny of the majority, too.I certainly wouldn't want a dozen Kirsten Sinemas's in the Swedish parliament, that's for sure. When the former government had one single parliament seat advantage, a single (ousted party maverick) representative forced hardline concessions from the rest of the majority coalition until the end of her term. That's not how it should be.
So what happens to voters in an area where none of the major party platforms reasonably represent their local interests? How can those voters hope to influence the national agenda for any of the parties if the policy positions of their potential representatives are already dictated by the national party? Elect someone who they hope will lobby internally within the party for their actual interests while still being required to do what they're told by the party brass?No, the entry point should, as it to a large extent is, a party platform voted on by its members and championed by the party leadship and its representatives.
You can be expelled from elected office, like what just happened with George Santos, but they can't prevent him from saying he's a Republican or signing up to run again as a Republican.
I see the point of preventing it descending into chaos and making sure some legislation gets through, but I think it gets used too much, often on political goals that have been over prioritised and blown out of all proportion.
Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia. Since the beginning of your life, since the beginning of the Party, since the beginning of history, the war has continued without a break, always the same war.Not surprised. I have completely lost faith in EU which represents almost nothing good and noble for me, anymore.
I wonder how is Your faith doing regarding russia, Iran, North Korea, China, Nigeria, Syria?Not surprised. I have completely lost faith in EU which represents almost nothing good and noble for me, anymore.