Burqas are a symbol of extreme islamism, and they're misogynistic. But how much freedom do we have to give to the enemies of freedom?
Maybe not that woman in the burqa. But what about her daughters?
It depends which part of western society they're part of too. It is certainly a lot easier for someone to get away from their families in, say, Canada/the USA than it is in Turkey, as they age.I know radical Islamist families. It's an absolutely toxic environment to be in. They force their daughters to wear hijabs at ages like 7-8, and burqas once they hit puberty.
No, not really. Airports have never had an expectation of privacy or personal choice in some way. In my country, we are going the other way on clothing - nudity laws have been struck down here, especially over women's breasts, making it legal for women to be topless in public. Which never really happens much, but I guess it could now.Just think of post 9/11 airport security.
Nude as in, completely naked? Because that seems like the problem is they need to wear shorts, not shirts...walking nude around
In other words, what you're saying sounds like arguments pro prohibition of burqas to me.
On the other hand, the debate about freedom maybe isn't just about respecting 'evil' in the name of culture. There's also the argument that the right of freedom (to wear a burqa) protects against attacks on freedom as well.
having women who previously wore burqas just not leave the house anymore
And are we going to make it a policy to tell people from certain regions in the world that they are not going to be accepted in a country like Germany if they want to maintain a veiling tradition?
You did.
This is a very legitimate debate. I don't think respecting downright evil in the name of "culture" is the right thing to do.
The chief problem I see right now is that there is no consensus on what the purpose of a burqa ban actually is. Is it supposed to protect us from the influence of Islamism? Is it supposed to liberate oppressed women? Is it supposed to make concealing weapons harder? All of the above?
I'm not strictly speaking against such a ban, but I think that some hard questions need to be answered before it comes into effect. Like, do we really believe that banning such concealing garments is going to push female emancipation in a highly traditionalist milieu? Is this the more likely outcome to alienating members of these particular traditions and having women who previously wore burqas just not leave the house anymore? Do we want to set it as a paradigm for our society that a woman is not entirely free to choose her garment for religious or traditionalist reasons? And are we going to make it a policy to tell people from certain regions in the world that they are not going to be accepted in a country like Germany if they want to maintain a veiling tradition?
I'm not saying all the answers to these questions must be no. But I think if such a law is going to be passed, we owe it to ourselves and the people who are going to be affected by it (i.e. the women in burqas, who to my knowledge are not participating in this discussion) to honestly debate and answer these questions. If the German society can present valid reasons for a ban that outweigh those that oppose it, then I'm fine with it.
This is why I don't like banning things. It really is not the business of the state or me or you or anyone to tell someone else what they should and should not wear. It's down to the individual to choose this. If they feel compelled to wear such garments, that's a different issue that cannot be resolved by a ban.Do we want to set it as a paradigm for our society that a woman is not entirely free to choose her garment for religious or traditionalist reasons? And are we going to make it a policy to tell people from certain regions in the world that they are not going to be accepted in a country like Germany if they want to maintain a veiling tradition?
@The Flash
Don't get lost in peripheral stuff so much. I'd be interested in an argumentation against my POINTS. For example this one:
I'm honestly interested.
I didn't say that @The Flash. I said your arguments in context of women rights sound pro-prohibition to me, because (see above). I expected you to explain why I'm wrong.