Whenever I hear that, I get that old familiar feeling...
"This is an audacity! How dare they play so well? How dare they play this way in front of people who can't! That takes music away from the working class! That betrays the spirit of rock 'n' roll! You just cannot show your chops this way in front of a regular listener; he might feel as if he's not appreciated enough. That will not do!
They keep doing these complex compositions - a guy like you and me, heart on sleeve, we don't need to hide behind anything like that. Who do they think they are?
No no no, we definitely need a new wave of punk that will annihilate these pretentious poseurs! What would be next - people could start to listen to classical, for crying out loud!
What can we say? Oh, I know, they're bad songwriters. Yeah, you see? Mozart was too, really - ask anyone who can carry a tune, I doubt he will sing you anything out of that Cozy Tutti Frutti crap of his. No? How about they lack the heart and/or the spirit! Hey, don't worry, nobody knows what that spirit is, but Sex Pistols have it and they don't, you see? Still no? Well, let's just say it's wankery and praise Velvet Underground instead.
Oh, hello Mr. Wenner, hello Mr. Bangs, I didn't notice you had come in. We were just finishing our review of the new Jethro Tull album. Oh, sorry, my mistake, an album by Yes. Could we lick your boots some more, now?"
(important disclaimer: this is just for fun and I don't want to offend anyone who likes punk (I do too, in a way), Lester Bangs, Jann Wenner and the Rolling Stone Magazine or anyone who hates Jethro Tull, Yes or Dream Theater. Yes, I get that not everyone likes that. I just think the overall hate in the music world/press for anything slightly more cerebral/complex and praise of everything indie, alternative or "edgy" is ridiculous). Love, Prance.