Forostar
Ancient Mariner
Between 5 (or even 4) and 10 is more realistic. Since Bruce is one of our favourite artists.I did happen to give a 1 rating to "Dracula" and I think "Lickin' The Gun", because both are terrible. I see the point you're making, but the good news is that for relative rankings it doesn't really matter that much what absolute scale people use, as long as the ratings relative to each other are valid.
For example, if someone else's ratings were all between 5 and 8 because they're comparing these songs to every musical piece created by humankind, the collective ratings will still sort themselves out, since their 5s would line up with my 1-3's, and their 8s would line up with my 8-10's. It might skew the shared average, and it'll reduce the fidelity of this other person's input, but the relative effect for each song is going to be similar. If the output is a relative ranking, then the final average score won't matter. If you wanted to use this same data to compare against a different data set for Maiden albums or something like that, then it would be a problem, but that's not what this is.
Where you really risk throwing things off is if people rated each album in a vacuum, where the best song on every album got a 10/10 even if one album's best song was nowhere near as good as another album's best song. Since the intent of the data is to rank across all of Bruce's albums, that would ruin the input.
A scale is used to have grades with a meaning. But it does not imply you have to use all numbers.No, you can't, because then there would be no point in having a 1-10 scale.
If this were a 1-5 scale, I'd probably use 3 (or 2) - 5. It all depends on the meaning one gives to a number. I look at Bruce in an absolute way. Just as I look at all other music getting reviews in a metal magazine where grades have the same meanings.Let's say the minimum score you'll ever give is 6. Then why not make it a 1-5 scale?
This is sounding better already.The numbers are there for we to use them however we like. I choose to look at it in "the relative way", you choose to look at it in "the absolute way". That's fine.
I accept you apology.Just don't come picking on us because we disagree. Honestly, I don't know if you meant to sound like it, but every time you try to discuss about something it's like you're trying to sound superior and uselessly intelectual. I apologize if I got the wrong end of the stick, but that's the impression I get.
No one needs to change a point of view but it isn't forbidden either when there's different insight. At least, don't be ashamed to change point of view.As for the rest of you arguments, yes, I did pay attention to them, and I still don't agree. Removing the "best" word doesn't change what I think, it's still making you sound intolerant. You think the criteria a person chooses to use to vote on a specific poll defines what they do and don't like, or how much they like something. I think it doesn't, so what? It's not a fact that "the right way is the absolute way" like you're trying to imply with your arguments. No one needs to (and no one should) change their point of view to adapt to what you think it's "easier" and "less confusing".
People just could read what I explain and perhaps it makes sense to them. If they don't want that, fair enough.