JamesBong said:
No. The two most recent albums were horrendous, featuring the same predictable and uninspired crap over and over.
Well, I'll disagree on the thought that the most recent albums were horrendous, but that's just fine. You're welcome to your opinion, of course. Nor do I consider the albums, especially
The Final Frontier, to be predictable in any way. But hey, that's the firm land of opinion for you.
JamesBong said:
Steve Harris seems to think that pointlessly padding out songs to ten minutes automatically makes them good and complex; complexity is found in avoiding the routine and the predictable and continually introducing new concepts.
Complexity, as defined by dictionary.com, is "the state or quality of being complex; intricacy". In otherwords, a complex song is something that is carefully arranged and put together, which the longer songs, with multiple time changes and growing interplay between the three guitar setup, certainly has. The term you're looking for is "uniqueness". And I would disagree; my ears hear many differences between the various longer songs of the past few albums.
JamesBong said:
Maiden doesn't do this, no matter what the sheepish fanboys say. Nearly every song since The X Factor has had the same exact pattern: soft intro, verse, verse, chorus, instrumental, verse, chorus, soft outro. This is all they do, and they- and many of their fans- actually think they're being progressive and adventurous.
I've had the same criticism of the recent albums. However, I simply think you're wrong. Firstly, the "Sign of the Cross" form that many songs have had of late is actually "intro, verse, verse, chorus, verse, instrumental, chorus, outro". To be fair, only about 5 songs actually fit that pattern in the period in question. However, if you mean they begin and end soft, yes, that's something that's been going on of late. They ended that in
The Final Frontier, mind you. "Starblind", "The Talisman", and "Mother of Mercy" end hot. "The Man Who Would Be King" does it, but the outro isn't exactly soft either. Only "Where the Wild Wind Blows" follows the pattern you talk about. Somewhat, because it doesn't really have a chorus, either. It's more like a long tale. I see much variation, if not complete uniqueness, on this album. And how would you quantify "Isle of Avalon", probably the most interesting and different-sounding song they've done in years?
JamesBong said:
Anyone who thinks that dreck like When the Wild Wind Blows ranks up there with Hallowed Be Thy Name or Phantom of the Opera is only kidding themselves.
Your prejudice shows, as many Iron Maiden fans would humbly suggest they've written many songs since 1982 that deserve mention among the band's best. If you think something's dreck, that's just peachy. But your opinion is just that. I think that if you call "Where the Wild Wind Blows" dreck than you're a complete deaf inbred idiot, but again, that's just opinion, and I have no right to project my opinion over yours as you've attempted to do yours with us.
JamesBong said:
Many fans are posting reviews on Amazon saying that this album requires multiple listens to "get it," but that's nonsense. The truth is, with bands like Iron Maiden, the music either catches you instantly, or it never will. Forcing yourself to like music by repeating it over and over is a form of self-delusion.
Bull. Fucking. Shit. People absorb art in different ways. You don't always appreciate a fine wine the first time you taste it; it takes people minutes, hours of looking to "get" a Picasso; some books take five, ten, twenty reads to appreciate the full text. Works of art are subjective. If you're looking for a sound that hammers your ears and grabs you by the balls, Maiden has tons of that stuff. Many people enjoy listening for the wonderful intricacies that have been written more lately, and that's just fine. If you don't have the patience or understanding to listen to an album several times, that's you. Again, you're assuming your experience to be the superior, like most smug fucktools do.
JamesBong said:
I gave AMOLAD, TXF, VXI, and DOD many, many listens, but the simple truth is they are just lousy albums.
No. In your opinion those albums are lousy. People may disagree with you. Some may agree that some of those albums are lousy, but love others. Art is subjective. Your opinion is your own.
JamesBong said:
For some reason, Steve Harris is too stubborn or too dumb to realize that when an album has crappy production that the music itself will sound crappy; unthinkable, right? It's a good thing he didn't have so much creative control over the 80s albums, or Maiden never would have made it. This guy is destroying the band with his egotistical creative stranglehold.
Yeah, like that first album that was so terrible that he basically wrote and produced himself. Fact check time! In the seven albums released in the 1980s, Steve Harris wrote or cowrote 49 of 54 songs, or 90.7%. From
The X Factor through
The Final Frontier, Steve wrote or cowrote 57 of 60 songs, or 95%. However, the percentage of songs soley written by Steve has plummeted from over half to around 10%. While it's no secret he has the final say, it's hard to argue he has much more creative control now than he did then. Iron Maiden is, and remains, Steve Harris and Band.
JamesBong said:
When reviewing an album, think of it this way: if the band went on tour playing only songs from the recent album, would you go see it? A lot of you guys will answer yes of course, but discerning fans would not. What happened when Maiden stupidly decided to play the entire AMOLAD album on tour? The fans were outraged, and there was so much backlash that they decided to change it up.
I'm pretty sure that hundreds of thousands of people saw the
A Matter of Life and Death Tour. The backlash you mentioned happened only in the United States, and Iron Maiden played the entire album throughout the whole tour. They then began the "A Matter of the Beast Tour", four months later, which was a separate entity. The only reference I could find to Iron Maiden changing their setlist as a result of fan backlash was an unreferenced line in Wikipedia that came from your IP range. So, yeah. Source on that one required. Most of the people I know who saw that tour loved it.
JamesBong said:
No one wants to sit through 70 minutes of boring, lifeless prog rock that mostly sounds the same.
Good thing most people think that Iron Maiden doesn't make music like that!
JamesBong said:
I'm sure Maiden will play several songs from TFF on tour, and I'm sure half the audience will fall asleep after waiting 3 minutes at the start of each song for Bruce to stop mumbling and start singing.
We heard the same criticism of the current setlist. Unfortunately, the bootlegs just don't show this as fact. The new songs, the ones from A Matter of Life and Death seem to be getting a solid crowd reaction, almost as much as some of the older classics. Add in the fact that Maiden is again playing to a few hundred thousand people on the current tour, that makes this just plain bunk.
JamesBong said:
This band needs to either shit or get off the pot. Either make music that has some fire and creativity to it, or quit already. The last thing Iron Maiden should become is like Ozzy or Megadeth; washed-up rockers doing the same crap over and over.
That's what they'd be if they just did what you want, rehashed the 1980s over and over. For better or for worse, Iron Maiden is doing something different than what made them famous. You may not like it, but the numbers speak for themselves. We're looking at a #1 album in the UK, Canada, Germany, and Scandinavia. A #3 album in the United States, their highest charting album of all time in that area, and only the second to crack the top 10. The first, of course, was
A Matter of Life and Death. The band is on a successful tour playing stuff mostly from 2000 and later, and they're rocking every gig they play.
If you don't like the new direction...
don't buy the fucking album.
Don't go to the fucking tour. Buy a copy of
Live After Death and masturbate to it all night long and clean yourself off with your
Powerslave t-shirt. I don't care. I don't even care if you don't like it. You're welcome to your opinion. I just don't like you coming here and telling everyone what they need to think. As adults, as sentient beings, we have the ability to choose for ourselves. We don't need some prick telling us what to think and do. It's your attitude that's the problem, not your opinion.
JamesBong said:
Oh, and don't even bother replying to this. I already know what you're going to say: "LOL u prolly liek justin bieber and lady gaga hahahaha go listen 2 them fag lol iron maiden is troo metal and makes brilliant msterpieces hahaha." Spare me that typical metalhead bullshit, it's so predictable.
I trust I've been eloquent enough for you.
Oh. 3/10. Obvious troll is obvious, but thanks for the opportunity to say what I've been thinking for the past couple weeks.