Cat Milk Supreme
Ancient Mariner
Scarred for life. Wow. That's not exactly a shining recommendation haha. It's also not a common reaction, in my experience.
❤ Dating Advice For MaidenFans Thread ❤
- Thread starter Night Prowler
- Start date
JudasMyGuide
The incorrigible papist
Indeed, this thread turning to actually pretty much recommending prostitution to someone who has repeatedly demonstrated mental health issues, low self-esteem and concerning ideations etc. is disgusting to a degree I have never seen on this forum and I'd genuinely propose a mod action here.
I mean, if the other guys want to debase themselves, that's one thing, if they want to flaunt it in public, well, it's their honor and dignity.
But the point is - every time a man has to pay for sex, he admits he can't get it without paying. How much money did you have to pay for a woman to touch your dick where everyone else is getting their sucked for completely free?
Especially if you're in a mentally unsound place, when the post-nut clarity hits, it can worsen your issues to a significant, even dangerous degree.
This is a dating advice thread, take your coke and whores elsewhere, for fuck's sake.
Cat Milk Supreme
Ancient Mariner
Sex work is work too, bro. You consider sex workers as debasing individuals? How lovely. Honour and dignity? Oh my, this whole sentence is so riddled with repression, holier-than-thou judgement, utter toxicity.
And a mod response? For a different kind of advice to a guy who A - suggested it himself and B - had failed with several other tactics? Maybe it was close to the line but the mods didn't intervene, not something that can be said about many of your rants in other threads.
Maybe is wasn't great advice but that's in the eye of the receiver, its a personal thing.
I'm not gonna go back over the thread but I'm pretty sure that the language used was nowhere near as crude as your own in the above post.
Dating and sex are intertwined. Not everybody who visits a sex worker suffers mental degredation because of it. So how about you take your judgement and your high horse and fuck off back to the politics thread and await your next mod intervention.
Vaenyr
Ancient Mariner
To add to your point, not everyone who visits a sex worker does so for sex either. I've read many accounts of people going to sex workers to simply have some kind of human connection. Someone to talk with. Someone to cuddle. Stuff like that.
"Debasing", holy shit. And I thought leftists like me had the monopoly on high horses lol
Cat Milk Supreme
Ancient Mariner
Definitely true, I seen it in one of the Young Guns films
So, here's an interesting conundrum.
The Maidenfans rules don't mention anything about the law, with the exception of copyright law. We've long considered copyright law as the single most serious threat to the forum. It is not currently against the rules to encourage someone to break the law, and that's partially because "which law should count?"
Seriously. Should we go by the laws in Mexico? Estonia? Czechia? UK? Canada? USA? Saudi Arabia? Singapore? Which jurisdiction in those countries? We've long tolerated discussions of drug use and other similar things that are broadly, but not universally illegal, as long as it doesn't violate the rest of the rules. I certainly consider employing a sex worker to be within this area of tolerance. I see nothing wrong nor immoral with the employment of sex workers within safe and consensual environments.
While it is true that, depending on region, traditional methodologies of employing a sex worker are rife with crime and violence, this is also not universally true. I would have preferred to see more emphasis on ensuring the ethical nature of such employment, but, in general, I find nothing within that aspect that requires moderation.
Similarly, I see very little that is actionable about the post-sex work part of the conversation. Some members have said things I find morally reprehensible, but I'm not here to tell people how to view the world, only what is appropriate to post here - and to remove them if they are unable to obey the rules.
However, I do think the diversion from the main conversation is significant, and we should all try to return to the actual discussion rather than a side tangent on swinging or on the morality of sex work.
I will remind everyone, however, that:
With that in mind, I think it's time to return to the original discussion, and to avoid personal attacks, be they coded or direct.
The Maidenfans rules don't mention anything about the law, with the exception of copyright law. We've long considered copyright law as the single most serious threat to the forum. It is not currently against the rules to encourage someone to break the law, and that's partially because "which law should count?"
Seriously. Should we go by the laws in Mexico? Estonia? Czechia? UK? Canada? USA? Saudi Arabia? Singapore? Which jurisdiction in those countries? We've long tolerated discussions of drug use and other similar things that are broadly, but not universally illegal, as long as it doesn't violate the rest of the rules. I certainly consider employing a sex worker to be within this area of tolerance. I see nothing wrong nor immoral with the employment of sex workers within safe and consensual environments.
While it is true that, depending on region, traditional methodologies of employing a sex worker are rife with crime and violence, this is also not universally true. I would have preferred to see more emphasis on ensuring the ethical nature of such employment, but, in general, I find nothing within that aspect that requires moderation.
Similarly, I see very little that is actionable about the post-sex work part of the conversation. Some members have said things I find morally reprehensible, but I'm not here to tell people how to view the world, only what is appropriate to post here - and to remove them if they are unable to obey the rules.
However, I do think the diversion from the main conversation is significant, and we should all try to return to the actual discussion rather than a side tangent on swinging or on the morality of sex work.
I will remind everyone, however, that:
With that in mind, I think it's time to return to the original discussion, and to avoid personal attacks, be they coded or direct.