Oh, there'd be nothing wrong with playing Alexander again. But I just think it'd be too soon. I don't recall any situation like that. When they dust off a rarity, it has to wait a few years for another chance to be performed live. Althought I might be wrong, perhaps there's been a case that proves the opposite.They never changed only 1 song for new leg, so there must be at least 2. I also don't see that they'll play ATG again, but it's very popular song that was received very well. Crowd would go nuts. Why not do it again?
I wouldn't call AtG a "very" popular song. For many of us (including me) it's the Holy Grail of their work, but it's not really a hit.
I have a feeling that they finally played Alexander the Great because they "had to" do that. There were many occasions when they could have played it. Over the years, we heard lots of excuses and explanations. "Adrian doesn't remember the solo", "Bruce doesn't like the lyrics", stuff like that. It was the dream of the fans, but was it really their own wish? We got to hear it live and it was amazing. Somewhere in Time was my 1st Maiden album, Alexander was one of the very first songs that made me love the band. But despite the euphoria that we all witnessed back in 2023, it seems to me that Maiden weren't even focusing on the song in the interviews from that period. To me it was like "Yup, we finally did it, enjoy". Of course, I could be wrong, but that's the way I see it.
You're right about the fact that if they change songs for another leg it's always more than 1 rotation. I've never thought about that, but yeah, it makes sense.
I wish they swapped 2 Minutes to Midnight and Aces High for something else. The Evil That Men Do (the song which Steve would like to play, according to an interview from a few months ago) could easily replace any of them.
Last edited: