Both are very big (live) hits and one is just tougher for the band. Hills was also skipped during the Blaze era for obvious reasons. I think it's normal for a band (whose setlists are usually not 20 songs) to drop some of its biggest songs (from 5+ of them) for some tours. Unexpected, but still. It wasn't even a regular song during the second Reunion and first album tour!Seems bizarre that Run To The Hills has typically not been in the setlist for the last 25 years but FOTD has.
Yep, FOTD album was perfect for such promotion because of the style of the songs.Back in 1992 fear of the dark and afraid to shoot strangers were like iron maiden enter sandman and nothing else matters. Those songs were more than often on tv and radio. For me was a great album. Very 90s.
The sing along part is one of the best moments in an iron maiden show. Im really happy to see that song what has become. I grew up with that album. I have great memories of thst yearsFear of the Dark is not as good of a song as Hallowed, but I think it is better live than Hallowed and I typically enjoy it more when I am at a Maiden concert. I have seen several shows now where Hallowed was dropped and I haven't missed it a single time.
With that being said, I also wouldn't miss FOTD if it was dropped as well. But I think of the staples it brings the crowd energy like no other.
The studio version is more dark like the intro has a very good vibe. Like a horror movie. But i prefer live at donington versionA Real Live One was what made Fear of the Dark, Fear of the Dark. Definitely. I was one of its many victims. I didn't like it that much before the live version.
An earlier example is the "Angus" chants on AC/DC's Whole Lotta Rosie from the 'If You Want Blood You've Got It' live album (recorded in Glasgow, the crowd just happened to be chanting "Angus" when they started the song and it became a thing).and that thing Argentine audience did during symphony of destruction, cheering me-ga-de-th me-ga-de-th was sth grew from this (imho).
In my memory it was always popular but the Rock in Rio took it to another level. Also keep in mind there was a pretty substantial influx of new fans in those days as well so it was new to them.
This. Found these, so you're right (with some words from Nicko). Maiden were still pretty big in the early 90's. FOTD was better received than NPFTD.I got into Maiden when NPFTD was the current album so the FOTD album was the first new release album for me.
Being from the uk Maiden were still huge in their home country and there was a lot of buzz around the band. I know both NPFTD and FOTD get a lot of criticism as albums but at the time of release they were massive albums in the uk and from what I remember they were generally well received and had decent write ups in magazines.
NPFTD was number 2 in the uk album charts and had their first uk number 1 single with bring your daughter…. Then FOTD went in at number one and the singles from the album all charted well with BQOBD charting at number 2. The headline show at the monsters of rock was also a big deal.
It felt to me that as soon as they started playing the FOTD title track live it went down well and became an instant classic which is why they chose to release the live version as a single.
I can’t speak for the rest of the world and remember this was pre internet days too but, Maiden to me seemed massive in the UK in the first half of the 1990’s.This. Found these, so you're right (with some words from Nicko). Maiden were still pretty big in the early 90's. FOTD was better received than NPFTD.
View attachment 40704
This. Found these, so you're right (with some words from Nicko). Maiden were still pretty big in the early 90's. FOTD was better received than NPFTD.
View attachment 40704