USA Politics

Nah, Bill Maher sucks. He's a deeply unserious person high on his own farts.
Also, no, he most definitely does not have a point, because he's once again simply arguing against a strawman. The thing he's whining about is not something that is happening in reality. Fucking grifters lying so that morons keep being outraged.
 
I disagree. I don’t agree with him 100% — or maybe even 50% — of the time, he repeats himself too often, and he’s condescending to guests on his show.

But, he represents a middle-left cranky Boomer/Gen-X perspective of American discourse that should still be heard.
Bill Maher is a creep and a racist. And there's nothing left about him. He's gradually drifted to the right and is now basically a closet MAGA.
 
Nah, Bill Maher sucks. He's a deeply unserious person high on his own farts.
Also, no, he most definitely does not have a point, because he's once again simply arguing against a strawman. The thing he's whining about is not something that is happening in reality. Fucking grifters lying so that morons keep being outraged.
Maher's opinion changes like the wind and his predictions most often fall flat.
 
I probably wind up agreeing with Maher about 75-80% of the time, and I can totally relate to his observation that he’s stayed in the same place while many of his more left-leaning friends have gotten more and more progressive over time, leading to the conclusion that he’s somehow swung to the right, which he hasn’t.

By U.S. standards I’m pretty clearly center-left, but some people on this board have tried to paint me as a reactionary freak for not passing their progressive litmus tests, calling me a bigot, a transphobe, and who knows what else just because I’m not high on the smell of their farts. Sad and pathetic, but it makes them feel important, I guess.
 
Cha, just to make sure I’m not lying to myself, I ran through a couple of political leaning tests I found by searching on Google (I even added “Europe” to narrow it down). One of them gave me a result saying I’m progressive—which surprised me—and the other one (a bit more tailored to Europe) called me centrist. So yeah, I think most of us are doing just fine. It’s just that some folks go a bit overboard with the progressive stuff.

political test.png
 
Sir, you’ve chosen to put me on your ignore or mute list. So... I suggest you return to your Ivory Tower.
Again: Explain how some folks have gone "overboard with progressive stuff". If you make generalized statements like that it's only fair to explain what exactly you mean, otherwise why say it? So, go ahead and explain please.
 
I’ve picked up on that type of overreaction in the short time I’ve been posting here.
Nah, calling out flawed and disingenuous arguments, no matter the source, is not an "overreaction". There are things that are entirely subjective. There are other things that are based on facts and data. The former we can argue and debate all day, the latter we can't. Some people seem to think that they can say the most outrageous things, often entirely made up or based on faulty understanding of simple facts or statistics, and somehow think that they arguments are just as valid and merit discussion as opinions that are derived from properly understanding the facts and their surrounding context.

Not every (sociopolitical) opinion is automatically valid and worthy of respect and discussion. There are some that can be immediately discarded.
 
Says the person who simply denies things said by anyone they disagree with even exist.

Last reply to you. Wherever your head is, it’s not out in the fresh air.
Hey, it's not my fault people can't make a coherent point that holds up to scrutiny to save their lives ;)

Again, there are things that are subjective and there are things that are based on facts. The latter are not up for debate, regardless how hard some folks try.

Edit:

Also, you were the one who brought up multiple times how people were reveling in schadenfreude in this thread, which did not happen.
And while we're at it, you explicitly chose to not respond to this post which is pretty telling as well.
 

Maher makes a few good "by the way" type of points, such as the whys of old movies being cringe. But his complete equation of supporting freedome for Palestine with supporting Hamas is bullshit. The people of Palestine are currently not suffering from Hamas rule, they are suffering from starvation, polio, homelessness and humiliation brought upon them by Israel. The Hamas attacks of 2023 have been repaid thousandfold, there is simply no justification of letting so many innocent people starve.
 
Since this thread is called USA politics, these are the currently active members that I know that are from the US

Flaming Blimp Crash
MrKnickerbocker
Mosh
Sheriff
Jer
(Detective)


Of these, two are very much left wing, one is leaning progressive, one is a moderate and one is leaning conservative. (One was probably conservative, but has mostly left the chat)

Just to address the obvious bias in how this thread is aligned and the fact the most obnoxious ultra-progressive members are not from the US at all, yet they tend to school the actual US members on their politics (or at least, how the US should be).

Just an observation.
 
Also

Maher makes a few good "by the way" type of points, such as the whys of old movies being cringe. But his complete equation of supporting freedome for Palestine with supporting Hamas is bullshit. The people of Palestine are currently not suffering from Hamas rule, they are suffering from starvation, polio, homelessness and humiliation brought upon them by Israel. The Hamas attacks of 2023 have been repaid thousandfold, there is simply no justification of letting so many innocent people starve.

even if I wanted to address this, I can't, since I had already been warned to see the light or else, however I'd suggest moving this particular discussion to the Israel x Palestine thread that I'm avoiding for that exact reason.
 
Since this thread is called USA politics, these are the currently active members that I know that are from the US

Flaming Blimp Crash
MrKnickerbocker
Mosh
Sheriff
Jer
(Detective)


Of these, two are very much left wing, one is leaning progressive, one is a moderate and one is leaning conservative. (One was probably conservative, but has mostly left the chat)

Just to address the obvious bias in how this thread is aligned and the fact the most obnoxious ultra-progressive members are not from the US at all, yet they tend to school the actual US members on their politics (or at least, how the US should be).

Just an observation.
Ooo ooo ooo, which one of the progressive/moderate/left wing folks am I.
 
Since this thread is called USA politics, these are the currently active members that I know that are from the US
At first I was gonna be grumpy about you leaving me off your list and then I realized I've actually been able to keep my mouth shut even though this thread has been giving me a headache for months on end lol.

(Detective)

(One was probably conservative, but has mostly left the chat)
Detective is always "prog this" and "prog that" until you see his voting records.
 
Just to address the obvious bias in how this thread is aligned and the fact the most obnoxious ultra-progressive members are not from the US at all, yet they tend to school the actual US members on their politics (or at least, how the US should be).
I'll address this, since we all know you're taking shots at me anyway ;)

No one is "schooling" the US members on their politics. There have been literally moments like Detective ranting about post-birth abortions, a thing that isn't only happening but is physically impossible, due to being fed too much right wing propaganda. One doesn't have to be from the US to know that this is wrong and a lie. Pointing out such isn't "schooling".
Or how he was furious about Pride Month and asked why veterans weren't getting recognition, despite there both being singular days and a dedicated month for the military. And then he turns around a votes for the candidate who consistently disrespects veterans and the party that constantly fucks over veterans. Turns out despite not living in the US, some of us are better informed about the facts precisely because we don't consume Fox News.

Also, one doesn't have to be American to know how obnoxious Bill Maher is and how nonsensical most of his takes are nowadays. They follow little logic and can be picked apart quite easily.

As for the "how the US should be": American politics influence the entire world. Of course it's better for the non-US folks if the US doesn't turn into a fascist regime. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out.

So, instead of following the conservative playbook of always presenting themselves as victims, poor underrepresented underdogs fighting against the biased mob, take an actual stance and defend it. Turns out once we talk about facts one side is far more equipped to defend its arguments and it most definitely aren't the right wingers ;)


While I don’t think Bill Maher intentionally conflates the two, he doesn’t do enough to prove he doesn’t.
Then you haven't listened to anything he's said. He has been a raging Islamophobe for ages and has been intentionally conflating the two. That's his fundamental take on the matter.


I assume I’m the moderate.

Ever notice you never hear about moderate extremism?

Yet, ideologically, we fight a two front war. We’re the army in that metaphor, though, that says to the two extreme factions “relax, join us in the middle with our friends on the polar opposite side of what you think for some beers and burgers — err, or grilled kale, or whatever. Just stop shrieking.”
I'm sorry, but this is such bullshit lmao

One side wants everyone to have equal rights. The other side literally advocates for fascism. And the centrist are over there asking to compromise, "hey let's have a little fascism and a little genocide, then both sides will be happy, right?".

Even the simple act of conflating the two as if they were in any way comparable is beyond disingenuous. The US is descending into fascism due to the right wing. The left has been screaming about that for years and every single one of their warnings is coming true, yet we're supposed to concede that the progressives have gone too far? Because they don't want minorities to be treated bad or outright lynched? Maybe it is valid to "shriek" when one side is (once again for emphasis) literally descending into fascism and has started deporting innocents, yet people would rather "shriek" about pronouns?

Centrists are so incredibly frustrating, because they think they are so much better than the "extremes" (yet always project that image onto the left), yet most of the political ideas that have made their lives better were progressive ideas. The fact that they can never outright articulate their issues with their left beyond vague buzzwords indicates quite well the underlying bigotry. I'm sorry that you can't eat your burgers in peace, while the GOP is fucking up the economy (just like the left warned you) and is stripping away US citizens of their rights (just like the left warned you). Turns out some people have empathy for their fellow human beings and can't just look away at people being kidnapped and having their constitutional rights violated. I thought Americans were pretty big on the constitution and the first couple of amendments. Turns out eating a burger in peace and taking pot shots at the left instead of facing the fascists is far more comfortable I guess.
 
Last edited:
You’re right to differentiate between support for Palestine from support for Hamas.

While I don’t think Bill Maher intentionally conflates the two, he doesn’t do enough to prove he doesn’t.

My read on it is that he’s calling out Americans for taking more extreme stances on the Israel-Palestine topic without their understanding of or stake in the conflict.

He’s also making a point that the progressive Americans’ professed values on other topics, such as gender equality or LGBTQ+ rights, don’t align with fundamentalist Islamic doctrine.

Which simply means that he is either too lazy or too stupid to make the distinction. Being against a genocide is not an extremist view, and it does not automatically mean supporting Hamas or fundamentalism. A queer person can think it's shit a thousand people are being ruthlessly murdered without having to want to live in their society. Maher could simply listen to these people or talk to them, instead of making a sanctimonious monologue based on a mere idea of what is being said.
 
Back
Top