Of course, in my country there are also left- and right-wing parties. But since it’s a small country, those definitions are more nominal — not nonexistent, but definitely less pronounced than in many other European nations. Also, our main left-wing party is literally descended from the old Communist Party. After Lithuania declared independence, the Communists simply rebranded themselves as Social Democrats. Sure, they’re pro-Lithuanian and pro-European now, but the roots are still rotten. And that definitely doesn’t help my relationship with 'the left'.
That must be interesting to have rebrand of a former communist party at play in modern politics.
Seems like there’d always be a stigma but maybe some would have taken comfort in the familiarity early on.
In our system, Republican and Democrat have flipped roles, fractured, and reformed.
The Republicans were the anti-slavery abolitionist party mid 19th Century. So, considered “left” or “radical” during that time.
20th Century, they shifted toward small government and fiscal conservatism. Then big government conservatives.
Now, they’re a right-wing populist party.
The Democrats, by contrast, go back to Thomas Jefferson.
They started as an agrarian “states’ rights” party that opposed civil rights reforms.
Post Civil War, they were the “Southern” party.
Big shift left toward social welfare, liberalism (US definition), and civil rights under FDR but they made concessions to keep the Southern contingent.
Lost its Southern conservative base to the Republicans in the 60s but broadened to include minorities, labor unions, urban voters. Seen as party of the working class.
Now, party of progressive taxation, social programs, expanded civil rights.
I guess that shows that a party label is only as relevant as its stance at a given point in time.