I think there are two different things at play here. As far as studio recordings go, I agree with SMX - there is no vault. Even in the Birch era, I don’t get the impression that the band was hard at work making demos, alternate mixes, or recording rehearsals. There are some exceptions I’m sure (in addition to things we know exist like AMOLAD b-sides) but I think Maiden actually would’ve released that stuff by now if it existed. Seems like whenever they go for an archival release, they don’t have a whole lot of material. If Rod had the material to put together a 10 CD Number of the Beast box set with vinyl, stickers, Eddie paper clips, and whatever other trinkets they could think of and charge $500 for it, he probably would and the fan base would eat it up.
The most rich period for alternate recordings is probably Dance of Death and, as More Tea Vicar proved, that well isn’t very deep.
On the live side, there’s definitely a lot of stuff in the vault. Maiden probably has audio and video recordings of everything since Bruce came back and they could always do what other bands do and copyright claim any good soundboard bootleg and release it commercially. Even in the 80s and 90s there is a lot of pro recorded stuff that we know exists. Just off the top of my head: NYC 1982, Hammersmith 1984, Wembley 1990, anything from the Fear of the Dark tour.
IMO it’s not laziness preventing the band from releasing this material. The vault isn’t big, it’s pretty much just live recordings, they’re going to need stuff to milk the fan base with when Maiden retires. Look at how the floodgates opened with Rush right after they retired. A “holy grail” live recording gets released every year at this point. Just be patient, that isn’t too far off with Maiden (sadly).
BTW to answer the question, I will get this at some point. Beast Over Hammersmith is one of my favorite Maiden live albums and the $40-50 sale price is a bit more palatable than the advertised price. I’m also curious about what the vinyl master is like because that 2014 (or whenever it was) vinyl pressing is awful. Speaking of which, I picked up a very clean OG UK vinyl copy of NOTB and it kinda blew my mind. The original CD sound is really good too, but that original vinyl is crisp. Highly recommended.
The most rich period for alternate recordings is probably Dance of Death and, as More Tea Vicar proved, that well isn’t very deep.
On the live side, there’s definitely a lot of stuff in the vault. Maiden probably has audio and video recordings of everything since Bruce came back and they could always do what other bands do and copyright claim any good soundboard bootleg and release it commercially. Even in the 80s and 90s there is a lot of pro recorded stuff that we know exists. Just off the top of my head: NYC 1982, Hammersmith 1984, Wembley 1990, anything from the Fear of the Dark tour.
IMO it’s not laziness preventing the band from releasing this material. The vault isn’t big, it’s pretty much just live recordings, they’re going to need stuff to milk the fan base with when Maiden retires. Look at how the floodgates opened with Rush right after they retired. A “holy grail” live recording gets released every year at this point. Just be patient, that isn’t too far off with Maiden (sadly).
BTW to answer the question, I will get this at some point. Beast Over Hammersmith is one of my favorite Maiden live albums and the $40-50 sale price is a bit more palatable than the advertised price. I’m also curious about what the vinyl master is like because that 2014 (or whenever it was) vinyl pressing is awful. Speaking of which, I picked up a very clean OG UK vinyl copy of NOTB and it kinda blew my mind. The original CD sound is really good too, but that original vinyl is crisp. Highly recommended.