Josh
Ancient Mariner
Please Iron Maiden,next time 8 songs no more than 60 min! The album is good but wayy to long!
Yeah I don't think there is going to be a next time.
Please Iron Maiden,next time 8 songs no more than 60 min! The album is good but wayy to long!
When was the last time you found a difference in production when you got the actual copy?I think we should wait for actual release to criticize the production value of the album
I think it could be cut to 60 minutes but more because of lack of vocals than repetitiveness.Love the production
Some of the songs are great, some are crap
The ones that are bad are too repetitive
This album could have been cut to 60 min and then it would have been supreme. For now there is a lot of chaff to sort through
Yeah I don't think there is going to be a next time.
Every album I've listened to pre-release has sounded better post-release and that's not just with MaidenWhen was the last time you found a difference in production when you got the actual copy?
Yes, i agree, but i'm talking about the criticism so far. I don't really get what problem people are having with the production, and honestly i feel like it's going to be another case of "Kevin sucks", something i was never able to understand
You got me thinking, and i'm ususally not at all a "conspirative" kind of guy, but... Is it possible that the leak is, in fact, made out of rough mixes?Like @syriaca said a boatload of pages back, there just isn't much cohesion between levels of tracks. It sounds like a rough mix were there still are a lot of levels to set. In general, you set rhythm guitars to one level, and then you put leads in front of them. In this mix, some sections appears louder than others, guitar-dubs come in and out and it just seems like there's no thought out layering of instruments and vocals. Adrian plays a solo, and then comes Dave much lower in the mix, with a tone that just disappears.
That is a criticism of my part, but it doesn't ruin an album by itself. But here we add a band that doesn't seem to know the material fully. It sounds like they're rehearsing for the first few times, before every part has been worked out fully. "Eternity" is obviously well played all the way through which is logical since it was the only song that was done and demoed before they started recording, but "The Red and the Black" and the others just... The whole band speeds up awkwardly not only between a section and another, but during sections. During some transitions they stumble, almost topple over.
I think the album is about a great many degrees too spontaneous. These points gave A Matter of Life and Death and The Final Frontier an edge that was reminiscent of their live performances - but they know the material they play live much better than this. It sounds uncertain instead of energetic.
I'd say no more than 80 minutes. Don't need double CD albums.Please Iron Maiden,next time 8 songs no more than 60 min! The album is good but wayy to long!
No, Most hardcore fans would say Iron Maiden never lost their form in the first placeAnd by hardcore fans?
I really don't understand why people moan about the lenght of Iron Maiden albums. I mean, as a fan, if the band was to release 4 albums at the same time, i would be thrilled. As a fan, i always want more and more music from the band, so i'm fine with 92 minutes instead of 40 or something, especially when those 92 minutes are filled with GREAT music. As far as i'm concerned, Maiden should release 7 albums in a row. Weekly. Forever.I'm very sorry for people who check their watches and feel this album is too long. I have listened to it twice this morning and literally thought I'd only been up for 2 hours - been up for over 3 at that point! This album is too short if anything, at least for me.
Don't worry, people who want short albums. They still made Seventh Son and earlier.