Probably that it's just a myth with no real life impact, and it's great marketing. He's probably not worried about offending people at this stage in their career.What the hell is Steve thinking?
Probably that it's just a myth with no real life impact, and it's great marketing. He's probably not worried about offending people at this stage in their career.What the hell is Steve thinking?
What the hell is Steve thinking?
G!G!G!A!G!F!E!
How do you think Maiden went from playing clubs with Blaze to headlining Rock In Rio with 250k people? Satanic sacrifice, of course.What the hell is Steve thinking?
I wouldn't get too worked up over it. It would seem Nicko is cool with it. Look at it this way - you're not praising the Devil with your username are you? Give Maiden the same break...."Iron Maiden" doesn't work on the Legacy of the Beast Tour because of the giant Baphomet Eddie on stage during the song.
There is NO WAY I will cheer to an image of the enemy. I am extremely disappointed in Maiden for taking this route. This forum can laugh at me if it wants to. This is dead serious stuff, whether you realize it or not. What the hell is Steve thinking?
But artworks with devils, 666 etc in the past was ok?
Seriously though, Iron Maiden the song has never not been played on an Iron Maiden show, at least not since the 1970's, and even then they probably did it every time.
Burning four virgin sacrifices in a wicker man was a-okay.
How do you know they were virgins????
needs to define virgin.... Biblically and literally it means "young woman".... catholic church changed its definition slightly