So much for Nicko remaining a member of the band

Lego said:
You don't know any of this, though. You're just drawing your own conclusions based on publicly-available information just like everyone else. These are not "facts".
Click to expand...
These are the closest thing to facts we have. Occam's razor and all that.

- Nicko and Maiden separated on great terms.
Click to expand...
This one's pretty easy to see by how both parties are talking about each other. Nicko still plays Maiden material, including stuff like The Parchment. The band sends him nothing but love. He's constantly joking about them and complimenting them.

- Nicko was the one who wanted to stop, he wasn't fired or pushed out.
Click to expand...
This is according to direct quotes by Nicko. Any claims of the contrary are nothing but conspiracies and have no backing at the time.

- The band clearly enjoys playing with Simon.
Click to expand...
This is clearly evident. You can see how much fun they are having on stage. Dave is entirely revitalized and steals the show every night. Adrian of all people is bantering with the other band members and even with the audience, something he's not known to do to that degree. Steve and Janick are basically unchanged, Bruce is all smiles almost all the time. Trying to deny how much fun they're having playing at the moment is silly.

- Simon is definitely worthy of taking over drumming duties and has more than enough chops to deliver in the studio.
Click to expand...
Where's the disagreement on this? Have you listened to his performances on previously recorded albums? The man is a professional. I've also heard him in person and in my opinion he is absolutely worthy of taking over. Apparently a huge chunk of the fandom thinks so too and they were won over.

- He is obviously the next permanent member.
Click to expand...
I can absolutely guarantee you that we won't be seeing many changes in the line up anymore or a rotating list of drummers. There's a reason Steve chose a drummer he's been playing with for a decade at this point.

Again: Any claims to the contrary would need to bring some mightily convincing evidence. At this point this evidence doesn't exist.
 
Nicko was removed as a "designated member" of Iron Maiden LLP. However his holding company, N McBrain Holdings Limited, was not terminated.

According to the 2024 filing, the "designated members" do the following: hold office, serve on the board, reviewing the LLC's activities and directing the group's business activities."

So what this is saying is that Nicko no longer directs business activities. He isn't part of the planning of the band. He cannot vote as part of the board. However, he can still be paid via his holding company (as I believe all band members are remunerated). They could also choose to add him as a regular member down the road if needed, but my guess is that the termination simply means he is no longer expected to vote officially on decisions.

That's all.

This is a nothing burger.
 
Further investigation of Iron Maiden Touring LLP shows that Nick was removed there, and in addition, the voting structure of Touring is reliant on there being a balance of power in the votes around the main LLP. So they have to remove him from both at the same time. N McBrain Holdings was never a part of Touring - seems the band members are directly paid through Touring. It notes that Touring is not required to remit any monies to the main LLP, so that makes sense.
 
LooseCannon said:
However, he can still be paid via his holding company (as I believe all band members are remunerated). They could also choose to add him as a regular member down the road if needed, but my guess is that the termination simply means he is no longer expected to vote officially on decisions.

That's all.

This is a nothing burger.
Click to expand...
this ^^^^

bludbrutha’s post is a bit misleading because it suggests total severance, but Nicko’s holding company is still listed on Iron Maiden LLP as an active entity.

All maiden members have a holding company and we can’t overlook the obvious fact that Nicko still has a certified commercial relationship with Maiden.

It makes sense Nicko isn’t paid for Maiden on tour. That much is obvious.

For what it’s worth, I strongly doubt Simon would ever become a part owner of Maiden. Why bother? He has the gig of a lifetime and can be paid well as a contracted employee.
 
We discussed this in one of the other chats recently. Nicko is still part of other companies in the Maiden/Phantom group, just not Maiden LLP and the touring company.

I do think it would have an impact on rights where any new material is concerned, like a new studio album or a live album recorded after Nicko's retirement from touring, but it doesn't say much else.
 
Yes. Ultimately, I think an album is covered under their existing structure. The main LLP would receive the money from the album's sales and streams and distribute to the holding companies as it is seen fit. Likely, Nicko would get a percentage of those profits based on what, if anything, he did on the album. I expect all band renumeration is like that.

All this means is Nicko is no longer a voting member of the board. Which makes sense as he is no longer making critical decisions for the band.
 
Yes it is all public information available on CH. As far as we can tell though there appears to of been no alteration to share holdings (although I think this would only come out on the updated CS01?) unless more share capital had been issued? Some members agreeements give other members the right to buy out shares if they are sold/retire? My commercial law is very rusty......

I don't have the time to look at or scrutinise the historic division of shares as to who may have preference shares etc. Doubtless it is structured in the most tax efficient manner possible as Andy Taylor is an accountant!
 
I'd just like to add that, when I was 11 years old, I got this cool Iron Maiden tapestry. White design on black cloth. The design was the mummy Eddie in chains. At the bottom of the tapestry it read "Iron Maiden Holdings LLC" or something like that. I remember this because I thought this was the title of the artwork. Made sense, seeing as the chains were "holding" Eddie. So for years I thought "man, Iron Maiden Holdings is such a cool ass piece of art!" Or I'd see the picture somewhere else, like inside the Best of the Beast book and think "Oh awesome! A full color version of Iron Maiden Holdings!" This is how my 11 year old brain worked.
 
chaosapiant said:
I'd just like to add that, when I was 11 years old, I got this cool Iron Maiden tapestry. White design on black cloth. The design was the mummy Eddie in chains. At the bottom of the tapestry it read "Iron Maiden Holdings LLC" or something like that. I remember this because I thought this was the title of the artwork. Made sense, seeing as the chains were "holding" Eddie. So for years I thought "man, Iron Maiden Holdings is such a cool ass piece of art!" Or I'd see the picture somewhere else, like inside the Best of the Beast book and think "Oh awesome! A full color version of Iron Maiden Holdings!" This is how my 11 year old brain worked.
Click to expand...
My little kid brain did this once. Family was on a trip and it was getting late so we pulled into a motel. Dad saw the neon sign and said "Shoot, no vacancy." We get back on the road and after a few moments I say "Dad, are we vacancy?" :facepalm:
 
Rob77 said:
Yes it is all public information available on CH. As far as we can tell though there appears to of been no alteration to share holdings (although I think this would only come out on the updated CS01?) unless more share capital had been issued? Some members agreeements give other members the right to buy out shares if they are sold/retire? My commercial law is very rusty......

I don't have the time to look at or scrutinise the historic division of shares as to who may have preference shares etc. Doubtless it is structured in the most tax efficient manner possible as Andy Taylor is an accountant!
Click to expand...
I'm no accountant but I read through a few of the documents and it's likely any share changes will come with the yearly filing.
 
Mosh said:
This is one aspect of the change that I am curious about. Every band is different, but in most cases that involve replacements for longtime members (Richie Faulkner, Tommy Thayer, etc) it seems to me like those members are brought in as hired guns legally even if they are public facing band members and write songs/record in the studio/etc. To me, Simon is a member of the band just as much as anybody else is and I'm not really sure how a case could be made otherwise. He is currently playing the drums on tour, he has been interviewed and appeared in a video on the official channel, unless they go into the studio with Nicko or someone else I feel like the only accurate statement is that Simon is the current drummer for Iron Maiden.
Click to expand...
I read an interview with Steve where he said that someone has to be in the band for two album cycles to start receiving royalties from merchandising, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top