These bands are not even metal. Ghost are 100% NOT metal. Slipknot are not a new band anyway and neither are Nightwish, bands with over 20 years of discography are not the future (nevermind arguing about their dubious quality). That’s like saying in 2001-2002 that Maiden were the future of metal.What was the future of metal in '90? What was the in '00?
I dont get you, what do you want? New Maiden and Metallica bands?
New bands are coming with their own style. If I want Maiden no.2 I will just play old Maiden records I dont need another copy/paste band.
Eurovision metal is bubblegum music with tons of keyboards and no real substance or....you know heaviness.
Nothing experimental about Sabaton and Nightwish, Voivod are experimental.Metal is a broad church. It doesn't have to conform to your narrow definition. The worst thing an older metal fan can do is try and gatekeep what should or should not be seen as metal. Good way to suffocate innovation and experimentation.
I'd say that Nightwish have more substance and are often way more heavy than Iron Maiden.These bands are not even metal. Ghost are 100% NOT metal. Slipknot are not a new band anyway and neither are Nightwish, bands with over 20 years of discography are not the future (nevermind arguing about their dubious quality). That’s like saying in 2001-2002 that Maiden were the future of metal.
Eurovision metal is bubblegum music with tons of keyboards and no real substance or....you know heaviness.
I'd say that Nightwish have more substance and are often way more heavy than Iron Maiden.
Certainly Tuomos has a much greater grasp of music theory than Steve Harris who openly admits he does't know much music theory. Maiden songs are almost always in Em and consist of mostly the same 4 chords.
The problem is that Maiden and ACDC have been dominating, leading the way for 40 years and Metallica for 35 years and they are semi retired.Not bothered by the future of metal anyway, it has been over 50 years since the first notes of Black Sabbath (the song) were heard, the genre had a great run. Whatever will be, will be....
I never said that Iron Maiden aren't entertaining. Johnglen was saying Nightwish didn't have substance and weren't heavy. I was directly challenging that.That does not stop them being much more entertaining than Nightwish’s songs for a hell lot of people (me included).
I also find the Ramones much more entertaining than Nightwish but hey, each to their own.
Nightwish pretty much invented the Symphonic metal subgenre.Nothing experimental about Sabaton and Nightwish, Voivod are experimental.
I never said that Iron Maiden aren't entertaining. Johnglen was saying Nightwish didn't have substance and weren't heavy. I was directly challenging that.
Don't take my promotions of Nightwish to be an afront to Iron Maiden.
I recognise that Iron Maiden are musically limited, but that doesn't stop them being my favourite band.
Depends on your definition of superior.They might not be as accomplished musicians as classically trained ones, but they are a fairly superior band to Nightwish just by looking at their respective discographies.
This is rather petty don't ya think? I've not seen them being arrogant about their music abilities.I don't care how accomplished Maiden or Nightwish or anyone is, their musical output is what matters at the end of the day. Maiden are far superior. Nightwish, and Tuomas in particular, seems like they think they are so much better and creative than they really are.
Well that's a bit like saying Beethoven was good for 1810'sMaiden were groundbreaking in their day, in the early 80's.
I never said Maiden was obsolete.Well that's a bit like saying Beethoven was good for 1810's
Not comparing Maiden to Beethoven, but things are called 'evergreen' for a reason.
Nightwish might be called that too some day, nothing against them, but saying Maiden is kinda obsolete is exaggarating a bit