One of the problems in comparing closely-related Indo-Europeans languages is that many of them have near-cognates with one another. The lines between Latin, German, French, and Old English, when compared to modern English, are so obscured due to centuries of borrowing and inter-communication.
Perhaps I should've been more specific. I should have asked about the verbs in the speech; "fight" is of Anglo-Saxon origin, while "surrender", as has been pointed out, is of foriegn origin.
When listening to the speech (try to find a recording...it's bone-chilling!), you can see how Churchill emphasizes the words 'fight' and 'surrender' more than others, implying a comparison between the two.
Perhaps I should've been more specific. I should have asked about the verbs in the speech; "fight" is of Anglo-Saxon origin, while "surrender", as has been pointed out, is of foriegn origin.
When listening to the speech (try to find a recording...it's bone-chilling!), you can see how Churchill emphasizes the words 'fight' and 'surrender' more than others, implying a comparison between the two.