[!--QuoteBegin-Onhell+Sep 8 2004, 02:32 AM--][div class=\'quotetop\']QUOTE(Onhell @ Sep 8 2004, 02:32 AM)[/div][div class=\'quotemain\'][!--QuoteEBegin--]True, but ISTANBUL, was formally known as Constantinople. There wasn't a new city built over ruins, the city was simply renamed.... LC 1- BA 0
[snapback]86039[/snapback]
[/quote]
Just to clarify all this foolishness:
Byzantium was the name of a town settled by Greeks around 650 BC. It was never of any importance, aside from its strategic location at the shortest crossing of the Bosphorus.
In 350 AD (or close to that year) the Roman Emperor Constantine built
Nova Roma (New Rome) on the site of Byzantium. The new city quickly became known as 'Constantinople' (Constantine's
polis, or city). While the Western Roman Empire fell, the Eastern one endured. It was known as the Byzantine Empire because the capital was on the site of old Byzantium.
When the Ottoman Turks took the city in 1453, the DID NOT change the name. It remained Constantinople. The city's name was only changed in the early 20th century after the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire. Essentially, "Istanbul" is the Turkish for of "Constantinople". I think it has something to do with the hard C sound not being in the Turkish language....or something.