That's incredibly interesting, Cried, thanks!
I'm something of an amateur Lovecraft scholar, read all the works, analyzed them, read the biographies, and I have to say: I think it's hard to separate his personal attitudes and beliefs from his work. This article is the most well-balanced, well-reasoned piece I've ever read about the man and why his fiction should be held to a higher standard than simple psychological analysis of the author himself, but Lovecraft's beliefs are still at the core of everything. Whether written as an escape, as a means to an end, as a literal retelling of his dreams (as was often the case), or as an anti-mythology regarding the insignificance of mankind, Lovecraft's "feeble humanity" was still entrenched in horrendous sexism, racism, and simple hatred.
I also think it shouldn't matter that Lovecraft was a bigot, he wrote some of the most influential, original, and legitimately scary stories to ever exist, but I'd argue that his hatred and bigotry inspired those things rather than divided them.
Didn't know you were so HPL well-read,
Knicks. Good stuff. Like you, I've pretty much read everything published
by Lovecraft. I have to concede, I haven't comprehensively read & dissected every piece of literary criticism on Lovecraft or of multiple books
about him; but I've read most of the biographies & most of his published letters to date. I collect every significant hardback publications of his works, all his
Arkham House publications,
Necronomicon Press,
Hippocampus Press works,
etc.
It matters, but it shouldn't matter to appreciation of his writing. Churchill won a Nobel Prize and he was as big a racist as any.
I think we've discussed this before in this thread, but Lovecraft's racism seems to be being discussed quite widely at the moment. The main reason right now is due to the World Fantasy Convention's decision to stop using the HPL bust for their World Fantasy Award. Basically, if you were black, would you appreciate being presented with this as an award? They had an impossible decision to make in terms of pleasing everyone.
There is currently a fairly extensive discussion of this over at SFF Chronicles for those that are interested:
https://www.sffchronicles.com/threads/562057/
It's lacking a bit in factual comment, but is interesting nonetheless. The argument is almost entirely in favour of the decision, with very few people actually discussing Lovecraft's racism at any great length.
S. T. Joshi's defence of Lovecraft's racism (if you want to characterise it as such) is also worth reading. The following letter touches on more than just Lovecraft's racism & was in response to "one of the most vicious articles ever written on Lovecraft" that appeared in the
New York Review of Books:
http://stjoshi.org/review_baxter.html
I don't agree with everything Joshi says, but at least he has the ammunition to make the point either way because of his vast familiarity with Lovecraft texts & letters. That aside, the World Fantasy Award debacle is about more than Lovecraft's racism; it also has to to do with the bust being, now, unsuitable as representing the award. After all, it doesn't represent Lovecraft's work (which people already think doesn't represent all of the SF/Fantasy community), but represents Lovecraft, the man.
It's difficult. Obviously, it doesn't stop one reading & enjoying an authors work. But Lovecraft's racism doesn't stop me enjoying reading about Lovecraft either. Lovecraft was a complicated guy; lots of mis-facts out there about him. There is much to admire about him. And, like his racism, much to really dislike about him. Why would this stop one reading about him though? I suppose it's easy to say this as someone who has never experienced, and is never likely to experience, racism. But I think people forget, that Joshi himself is hardly likely to be biased in this respect, being of Indian decent. My guess is
he understands racism just fine.