So, recently I read
Glamorama by Bret Easton Ellis, author of the infamous
American Psycho. True to his style, this novel is a black comedy in the same vein of his previous works, which satirise the vacuous, aimless lifstyles of the yuppie generation. In
Glamorama, the yuppie 80s of New York, which was the setting of the aforementioned
American Psycho is exchanged for the 90s although in the same locale. The 'story', for lack of a better term revolves around a hopelessly vain, arrogant and shallow (well...practically all his characters are like that so it's a bit redundant to give a character description, no matter how brief) model by the name of Victor Ward as he goes through complications of opening up his own uber-hip nightclub, while cheating on his girlfriend, leading a rather disorganised rock band, taking in copious amounts of drugs and being what a character in an Ellis novel should be. After meandering in a simultaneously purposeful and purposeless manner, the novel takes a 180 turn, when Victor is asked by a diplomat named Fred Palakon to go to London to search for one of Victor's ex-girlfriends, who has gone missing. Quickly, the novel takes a paranoid turn into a rather surreal work, not willing to describe whether the current scenes are fantasy or reality. Of course, in true surrealistic manner, Victor gets mixed up with a group of terrorists...who happen to be models as well. Yep...I'll leave it at that. As with any of his work, it contains the trademark dark, biting humour, the excess labelling and celebrity name-dropping (to the point where some critics have called it a list of commericals and famous names) and unflinching depictions of violence (although not on the same level as
American Psycho, there are a few). And of course, you'll probably end up worshipping it or considering it a waste of your time...up to you really.
I also read
The Cult of The Amatuer by Andrew Keen, a Silicon Valley insider and critic of the Web 2.0 generation. His argument is that the likes of Wikipedia, YouTube and MySpace (along with blogs and the like) are undermining professional talent, expertise and are creating a "digital forest of mediocrity" as he describes in the book. While it may have the blogosphere up in arms, with them labelling Keen as an elitist (as if there's anything wrong with that), it certainly is refreshing to see a bit of criticism of teh intrawebs, especially with another term of his called "digital narcissism", which describes the MySpace generation perfectly. Yeah, I'm not describing it very well at all since I'm tired. Check out
his site, there are also some great video links and hilarious comments left by disgruntled MySpaz peasants.