NO PRAYER FOR THE DYING - Your thoughts…

In retrospect we all see, that Steve should have listened to Adrian, to continue Maiden in a more progressive direction, but Steve being Steve fucked all up (this time, other times he, as creative Mastermind, was Great) Spin in it all you want, this album marks the beginning of Maiden decline.
I always wonder why change something that works, but I guess musician needs to not just do the same stuff, especially if their discography is not same-y. IIRC, Bruce also wanted that direction? Something heavier and proggy would have been perfect back then. I really want to hear NPFTD with a remix, polished and heavier production. I think some of the material will shine. It's probably the only Maiden album which won't loose its original feel and charm with a remix. Bruce is not against it, but I guess Steve is not a fan.
...both albums that have much better high points than NPFTD, but are nowhere near as consistent or coherent.
That's true. And No Prayer is still not a different ''phase'' for the band.
I'll say this: It is the only Maiden album I dislike. I think Maiden's discography would have been better off if they had gone right into Fear Of The Dark and skipped this one.
Combine both early 90's albums into one with the best songs - and we have a great and classic album.
I will forever maintain that a band "going back to their roots" results in a bad album filled with average-at-best songs 99.9% of the time.
I'm trying to think of a band with such example... but one can make such an argument when a band tries a new style or stuff, right.
Maybe I would like it more if it had better production. That would at least give the songs a little more life.
Definitely.
I also really don't like the raspy singing style Bruce was going for at this time.
At least it fits the material. And there was already some rasp in his singing in '88, so it was a natural way of things.
No Prayer isn't the worst album, but it isn't far off. It probably sits just above the two Blaze albums simply for the fact that it's less depressing (TXF) or embarrassing (VXI).
Despite the mood of TXF, the album is much more interesting and better in terms of the music than No Prayer. VXI embarrassing? Because of the repetition of two songs? That's ridiculous. And we have to say that we compare these albums with such a strong discography. But No Prayer is part of their weakest albums.
Good album, far from their worst.
It's subjective, but it's difficult to point out a worst Maiden album, even No Prayer.
...but NPFTD is still better than everything post BNW. I really dont see where all this dislike is coming from. Production is a bit stale, but still better than on at least 4 other maiden albums.
Wow!
One of the main problems of No Prayer is that it comes after a list of very good/excellent/legendary albums. And also compared to the one that followed, as a whole it may be better but it has no stand out tracks whereas FotD has the title track, Afraid and Be quick.
So as a whole it is better than some albums but the fact that there are no stand out tracks, that Maiden forgot about the album very quickly (and their odd choice of the songs they've played during that tour? Really, playing Public Enema Number One, Hooks in You but not playing Run Silent Run Deep?!?!) is, at least for me one of the reasons this album has this "bad" reputation
Agreed. FOTD highs are just too good and Janick wrote some stuff.
Run Silent Run Deep definitely should have been played live instead of Hooks In You, although the latter is fun, but they had the lead single for that. Public Enema was kind of unique, Holy Smoke was a single, Assassin was an odd choice because of the vocals.
I too have thought No Prayer is a reaction to the boom of Guns 'N Roses. I mentioned this elsewhere, but it's possible Slash's public statements about going onstage with ridiculous icebergs maybe caused the band to rethink their overly theatrical approach. The sound was raw and dirty, Bruce is rasping as much as he's singing, and the lyrical topics are, by and large, far more contemporary than what the band was known for at the time--not to mention once on tour, the theatricality was stripped way back. Who knows.
Possible.
Final Frontier is odd to me. I just did my annual relisten of the whole catalogue, and there's some legitimately great stuff on there. The title track, El Dorado, Isle of Avalon, The Talisman, Starblind...but it's baffling that the album as a whole never really clicked with me like so many others did. I never really get the urge to listen to it, and when I do, I never come away thinking I was wrong to be...largely unaffected by it.
TFF is a kind uneven and experimental album, but worse than No Prayer, no way.
I think my most recent post on the album still holds true regarding what I think of it:
Spot on, again.
 
I love this album and all the songs. My only real complaint is the production. It's not entirely dissimilar to SSOASS but it doesn't quite gel together the same way due to the home studio approach. Definitely not as bad when there are keyboards and additional guitars to fill the "space".

In regards to the vocals. Upon recently watching Maiden England it dawned on me that perhaps one of the reasons for this direction was the touring strain on Bruce's voice after so many years. In my opinion, it's easier to sing raspy at a lower pitch than clean highs if your voice isn't in great shape. So maybe that was part of the thought process knowing that it would make singing the songs easier on tour?
 
I like the title track and mother Russia. Otherwise I am not a big fan of it. Going from seventh son to this certainly is a downgrade. I also don’t like the sound of the album. It’s hard to describe but I just think it sounds a bit too scratchy and raw for my liking. Out of the 90’s albums I’d say it is the second best; I prefer it to both Blaze albums, but I like Fear of the Dark more. Overall I’d give it an 4/10. It gets bonus points because of how good the title track is.
 
Solid album, a big step down from SSOASS, but by far the best of the 90s Maiden albums. Lands around dead center in the Maiden catalog in terms of quality. Probably Janick’s best studio performance with Maiden.

And I really enjoy “Fates Warning”, even though the chorus blatantly rips off “The Clairvoyant”.
 
I always wonder why change something that works, but I guess musician needs to not just do the same stuff, especially if their discography is not same-y. IIRC, Bruce also wanted that direction?
Steve was disappointed tha SSOASS flopped on the US market. It was huge in Europe, but in USA it sold significantly less than expected. He realized that fantasy driven content did not really sell in America. That's why NPFTD has that street cred approach.

It's subjective, but it's difficult to point out a worst Maiden album, even No Prayer.
I see your point. But if it is possible to name a best Maiden album, it is also possible to name a worst.
TFF is a kind uneven and experimental album, but worse than No Prayer, no way.
NPFTD has some hits. TFF has none. But TFF has some tracks that are weaker than the weakest NPFTD tracks.
 
I think the biggest problem with NPFTD is that it's an album released after a few strong albums. If it was somewhere else in the discography, the perception would probably be different.

On the other hand, it's hard for me to hate an album that brought Janick into the band.
 
I like the album quite a bit and prefer it to half the 80s albums. It's not as strong as FOTD, it lacks the amazing high points. The title track or PENO are phenomenal songs, but they're not as legendary as FOTD for example.

Doesn't help that there are a couple of stinkers, Tailgunner in particular being the worst offender imo. The music is mostly alright, but I hate the disconnect between the subject matter and the delivery of the lyrics. Other songs like 2MTM conjure horrifying images but they are treated with a certain amount of seriousness. Tailgunner just takes the piss and that kinda ruins it for me.

It's a shame that this album has been all but forgotten by Maiden and that none of the songs became semi-regular (or even deep cut) staples. NPFTD and PENO work really well live, if the versions released as B sides are anything to go by, and I'd love to hear them in person.
 
It's not entirely dissimilar to SSOASS but it doesn't quite gel together the same way due to the home studio approach. Definitely not as bad when there are keyboards and additional guitars to fill the "space".
Yes, but the drum sound is bad. FOTD really improved the sound.
Solid album, a big step down from SSOASS...
This. I guess it's normal though, after the run of 80's albums and songwriting help from Adrian and Janick was really needed.
Probably Janick’s best studio performance with Maiden.
Janick is great on No Prayer, but so he is on Fear.
And I really enjoy “Fates Warning”, even though the chorus blatantly rips off “The Clairvoyant”.
Fates Warning overall sounds like a SSOASS song.
Steve was disappointed tha SSOASS flopped on the US market. It was huge in Europe, but in USA it sold significantly less than expected. He realized that fantasy driven content did not really sell in America. That's why NPFTD has that street cred approach.
Most likely.
I see your point. But if it is possible to name a best Maiden album, it is also possible to name a worst.
True. No Prayer is around there, but that speaks more about the rest of the discography.
NPFTD has some hits. TFF has none. But TFF has some tracks that are weaker than the weakest NPFTD tracks.
No Prayer's hits? The title track and Daughter? TFF has Talisman and Coming Home, to name two. You think a song like Mother Of Mercy or King is weaker than Hooks In You or Holy Smoke? Wow.
I think the biggest problem with NPFTD is that it's an album released after a few strong albums. If it was somewhere else in the discography, the perception would probably be different.
Ultimately I guess that was a big factor too. NPFTD could have followed Killers, for example. TNOTB, not sure.
It's a shame that this album has been all but forgotten by Maiden and that none of the songs became semi-regular (or even deep cut) staples. NPFTD and PENO work really well live, if the versions released as B sides are anything to go by, and I'd love to hear them in person.
Agree with all. At least during the 90's. The 90's live B-sides are good and enjoyable. I guess the new tour is our best chance for the 90's albums.
Would Maiden continuing the synth sound into the 90s have sounded passe?
Good question. They probably thought about that.
 
It’s consistent and a good listen today, but what a disappointment back then.
Released the same year as Cowboys from Hell, Painkiller, Rust in Peace, Gutter Ballet, Iced Earth, Lost Paradise, Monster Magnet, Empire, Seasons in the Abyss and more by other groups and after 7 huge Maiden releases in a row.
For some being the best year in metal and Maiden came up with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jcv
I think the biggest problem with NPFTD is that it's an album released after a few strong albums. If it was somewhere else in the discography, the perception would probably be different.

On the other hand, it's hard for me to hate an album that brought Janick into the band.
This is what it comes down to for me. Out of context I think the album is fine and I always enjoy listening to it, but when you start thinking about Maiden's trajectory and also where a lot of other Maiden bands were in 1990, it's hard not to think about what could have been.

Part of the problem is I think Maiden were in a bit of a similar situation as Metallica at the time where they had taken the progressive/synthy sound about as far as they could go. The only options were to go back to the roots (which they did) or change their sound completely as bands like Priest and Metallica did in the 90s. In the long run I think it's good they stuck to their core sound and found a way to reintroduce the more progressive elements one album at a time. It set the stage for a much more sustainable creative direction, obviously since they haven't deviated from it 30 years later.

But yea, on the topic of No Prayer I think the album has a lot to offer. Public Enema No. 1, Fates Warning, Run Silent Run Deep all have some really great riffs and hooks. Bruce's vocal style is controversial but it fits the material and of the "rasp trilogy" (Tattooed Millionaire, No Prayer, Fear of the Dark), I think it is best executed on No Prayer. It's not the direction I would want Maiden to take, but I think the album is fine for what it is.
 
After 7Son this album is a total let down. Songwriting wise and production wise. Beginning of the new bronze? tin? lead? era, end of the Golden Age, etc. I think (behind the curtains) this album may be influenced by what was popular at the time. Guns 'N Roses, etc. A nose dive of the Mighty. Also, Adrian left which is a major minus. In retrospect we all see, that Steve should have listened to Adrian, to continue Maiden in a more progressive direction, but Steve being Steve fucked all up (this time, other times he, as creative Mastermind, was Great) Spin in it all you want, this album marks the beginning of Maiden decline.
No Prayer for the Dying song is very good. Mother... musically is good but lyrics from today's perspective are atrocious. Tailgunner is poor man's Aces High. Do we need poor man's Aces? Bring Your Daughter... may be silly but it's good. It's fun. The Assassin is a filler song. Hooks in You has grown very much on me in recent times.
Thats a really good review, i feel it hits the nail on the head, and yet i dont dislike the album and find it a decent listen. Weird
 
It’s consistent and a good listen today, but what a disappointment back then.
No doubt.
For some being the best year in metal and Maiden came up with that.
I think it's fair to compare it to Maiden's albums.
Thats a really good review, i feel it hits the nail on the head, and yet i dont dislike the album and find it a decent listen. Weird
I think it's because of the short and energetic material. I still find it weird that this is the only album with only short songs. It was a curious decision after the previous albums and they quickly corrected it. It was on purpose for sure.
But yea, on the topic of No Prayer I think the album has a lot to offer. Public Enema No. 1, Fates Warning, Run Silent Run Deep all have some really great riffs and hooks. Bruce's vocal style is controversial but it fits the material and of the "rasp trilogy" (Tattooed Millionaire, No Prayer, Fear of the Dark), I think it is best executed on No Prayer. It's not the direction I would want Maiden to take, but I think the album is fine for what it is.
Lots of great riffs, melodies and solos, agree. And about Bruce's vocal style for 3 albums.
Part of the problem is I think Maiden were in a bit of a similar situation as Metallica at the time where they had taken the progressive/synthy sound about as far as they could go. The only options were to go back to the roots (which they did) or change their sound completely as bands like Priest and Metallica did in the 90s. In the long run I think it's good they stuck to their core sound and found a way to reintroduce the more progressive elements one album at a time. It set the stage for a much more sustainable creative direction, obviously since they haven't deviated from it 30 years later.
I don't disagree, fair points, but wouldn't a ''heavier sound/prog-continuation of SSOASS/more riff-y approach'' would have been an option for the next album? Heavier by Maiden standards. Completely changing their sound was never an option, back to the roots, yes. Everything worked out good, they changed their writing style 2 albums later, but who knows what they could have done if they continued with the prog elements, even without Adrian. They really ''changed'' their style/experimented for the next album, after all.
 
I like it a lot, but as many have said, it came out after many classic albums, so it is easy to not include it as a classic. I really like how different it is compared to the two before. It is cleary inspired by what was going on in the world at the time, after being home and out of the Maiden bubble they had been in for the whole 80’s, and a little twist to sound like they have an attitude like GNR, Aerosmith and similar bands. But still sounding like Maiden. I can understand why some fans did not like the album, with new guitarist and all.

When it come to the songs, there are no strong singles and live classic material there, but many good album tracks. Tailgunner is a good opener as usual, the title track is pretty good actually. Some nice melodies in Fates warning and public enemy number one. Great intro to The assasin and Running silent running deep. Hooks in you is underated, Bring your daughter overrated. Mother Russia is a good closing track, just not on the same level as the closing tracks on the other Bruce fronted albums from the 80’s.

Steve, Nicko and Dave plays superb as always, Janick struggles a bit, I think he just don’t sound as great as he did later on. Bruce continues the singing style he had on his solo album, it works fine with the material.

So yeah, I love it, just not as much as the 80’s stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jcv
Thanks for all your excellent replies! We’ll be discussing the album (and generally fucking about) in the next episode of Iron Maiden Pub Quiz podcast. Hope you give it a listen!IMG_8453.jpeg
 
Back
Top