D
Deleted member 7164
Guest
You're welcome guys, anytime.
Forostar said:It is a bit slower, but at least I won't have the f**king typing/editing/scrolling/selecting problem.
Zare said:You're welcome guys, anytime.
Considering PC is the market standard the PC prices also set the price standard for competing solutions. That means that if something cost twice as much as the market standard then there's something wrong and it's not with the PC the problem lies.LooseCannon said:Uhm. No, they're not. PCs are underpriced, and PC mfgs barely break even on a $500 system.
Intel are slightly better, yes, but a hell of a lot more expensive. So I think AMD's are generally better for the price. No, I'm still on my win XP copy (though you might as well go Ubuntu if you buy a new PC and don't want to pay for an OS. Ubunto is really good). I will though get Win7 for free next fall (my friend will attent some IT program at college where you can choose freely from Microsoft's list of products).LooseCannon said:Yeah, but you used AMD and Radeon parts, you're already sacrificing quality. Plus, you didn't buy an OS I see.
LooseCannon said:Yax, I'm sitting on a 20" iMac right now. And when you build your PC, don't forget to calculate in the cost of the operating system and virus protection. So, let's pull up a popular parts website and compare cash.
So, what are the parts you need to build an equivalent computer?
1. a 20" monitor @16:10 ($299).
2. A 8gb of RAM capable motherboard with DDR3 support and 1066ghz bus speed. ($134)
3. A 2.5" 320gb hard drive @7200 RPMs. ($102).
4. A Penryn 2.66ghz Core 2 Duo processor. I can't find the equivalent model (the E8200) anymore, but this is the closest they have. I'll give you a $75 credit on this. ($172)
5. 2GB of DDR3 PC38500. ($54)
6. WiFi N capacity. ($35)
7. Bluetooth 2.1 capacity. ($14) - Note, I am not pleased with this, I wanted internal only that didn't burn a USB slot, but I can't find one for a PC.
8. 8x DVD +/- R DL burner. ($35)
9. The cheapest 64-bit OS you can get. ($162)
10. One year of Norton or McAfee AntiVirus. ($40)
11. A GeForce 9400 M 256 DDR3 GPU. (doesn't exist for PCs, but let's guess...around $60 based on equivalent Radeon models)
Total: $1,107, plus labour & shipping?
The end result is this. You can build a good PC for cheaper, and probably personally you could. I know I can, if I shop carefully for parts and such. But the AVERAGE JOE can't do that. They can't bittorrent them some Windows 7 and know how to avoid viruses. They won't want to use the monitor you have lying around. Keep in mind that I picked the cheapest possible parts for this build, even though Apple uses parts of better quality for RAM and screens and such.
Oh, I forgot the case and supply, so toss in another $40 on the total there.
The quality of a $500 laptop is not very high. My parents bought one for my sister before sending her to school and it's been in for repair thrice. Basically it's garbage, and they're going to just give her a new one if it fucks up again. There's been a trend by the big PC makers to cut cost, cut costs, cut costs, and they make a profit by moving to cheaper casing, RAM, etc. We've been moving towards the disposable 1-2 year PC for awhile, like we treat TVs and such. You can set a standard price with crap components and construction, but if you look at high-end PCs, you are paying the same you pay for equivalent Macs. End of story.
Quetzalcoatlus said:Here are some facts that are -I believe- pretty the same everywhere:
1. People know that Windows is shit, yet they all have PCs operating with Windows
2. People know that Mac is better, yet they don't pass easily from PCs to MAc
3. But once someone get a Mac, that's it! He won't stop advertising it at every occasion
4. Nobody ever complained about a Mac
LooseCannon said:Let me assure you, #4 is NOT true.
Quetzalcoatlus said:Interesting. What could be the complain about? I only can imagine that is harder to upgrade, but this one knows from the start...
LooseCannon said:Some OS X features were stolen by Windows, and Vista's implementation of them was pretty crusty. Having said that, 7 looks better, but I still turn that crap off. I would hazard a guess that most people who have purchased a Mac like it in the end. But most people who don't like a Mac won't get one.