The_7th_one
Ancient Mariner
You would relisten 'For whom the bell tolls' It's a good song and it's very Maiden
...on their 1985 opus Innocence Is No Excuse.
(I have not listened to Rock The Nations or Forever Free)
You would relisten 'For whom the bell tolls' It's a good song and it's very Maiden
How?You would relisten 'For whom the bell tolls' It's a good song and it's very Maiden
I really wouldn't call this pure heavy metal, though.While listening to this album I realized I've totally fallen out of love with pure heavy metal. This one bored the shit out of me.
Sure, I'll listen now...You would relisten 'For whom the bell tolls' It's a good song and it's very Maiden
Question: would it be helpful to open a second thread to discuss nominations/future themes to divide that discussion out from the awesome album conversation? (That is to say, the conversation about the album is awesome. The album itself is not.)
This.I think we can keep it as one. You're keeping track just fine (it seems) and it doesn't take up too much space to nominate a new album or theme.
You would relisten 'For whom the bell tolls' It's a good song and it's very Maiden
My thing with this one was that I really liked the chorus, at least the first three lines of it. The final line ("...until the bell tolls") drops out of that cool "hallelujah" section and moves back into the style of the verses, which was little more than typical hard rock / metal chug. Kind of a wasted opportunity, because again, the subject matter is really interesting.Sure, I'll listen now...
...I don't hear Maiden in it very much. A bit of a driving riff in the beginning but the second the chorus starts it disappears! I think this one just gets lost in the mud of the rest of the album. I really can't say I find it to be that special.
Saxon's Solid Ball of Rock is often considered the last "classic" Saxon album.
What was occurring in 1990 that caused these bands to pull their synths and go back to their roots? Why was Maiden successful at evolving their sound in the late 80s while Saxon and Judas Priest were not? And finally, why did varying measures of success envelop each band?
I've gotten a sense that, other than Biff, the other band members have really been considered expendable over the years, but what I'm seeing now is that it depends on which motley crew he's put together on whether or not they will be able to hit Saxon's level of quality.
That cover, though. Does anyone have any information on why they chose that particular song? Was it an attempt to break into the US market? To put out a popular single? It's a really interesting choice for an album, especially one with such a divergent sound from the rest of the band's discography.
OK, the driving riff, yes, and the 2 guitar harmonies… The song is strong in my opinion.Sure, I'll listen now...
...I don't hear Maiden in it very much. A bit of a driving riff in the beginning but the second the chorus starts it disappears! I think this one just gets lost in the mud of the rest of the album. I really can't say I find it to be that special.
As of 1991-92, even with the arrival of grunge, metal was poised for a huge decade. Priest went extreme with the legendary Painkiller. Metallica released the black album and became arguably the biggest band in the world -- with the possible exception of Guns 'n' Roses, which had dropped the Use Your Illusion albums, with "November Rain" dominating MTV airplay. The Metallica-G'n'R co-headlining U.S. stadium tour was THE go-to event of the summer of 1992. Dio rejoined Sabbath and released Dehumanizer. I mean, things were GREAT! Right? But then ... Rob left Priest, Dio left Sabbath (again), Bruce left Maiden, Metallica went into therapy and G'n'R imploded. Metal retreated back to the non-mainstream. Did grunge dethrone metal, or did metal abdicate? I think it is more the latter, as the elite metal artists of the '80s allthat would change in the 1990s - the departure of Bruce Dickinson, the wave of grunge and nu-metal, and general stagnation in heavy metal would lead to a dark decade.
Did grunge dethrone metal, or did metal abdicate? I think it is more the latter, as the elite metal artists of the '80s allshit the bedhit the creative skids at about the same time.
Agreed. There's a lot of myth about "grunge killed metal", the only thing grunge killed was Cobain. It was over by 94, yet all the metal bands from before Grunge are still around now, 25 years later.
...but I can't even tell you who played Bass for Saxon before Nibbs Carter (Who I think started playing for Saxon in '94) or who played alongside Paul Quinn before Doug Scarrett came to the band.
See, this is what I don't get. I don't know that I find it to be better than Poison, merely because I understand that Poison was garbage and I truly, honestly believe that Saxon is better than the album presented this month. I guess I should say: I would be disappointed hearing this album in 1988, knowing how much better Saxon *could* be.This pretty much nails the critical consensus and context of what the album was.
While I largely agree, I liked it at the time and am OK with it now. Heavy music was largely shit around then and it was better than Poison.