CriedWhenBrucieLeft
Meme Only Account
I don't understand why we couldn't have taken all this to the 100K thread, guys.
He did indeed say that, it was recounted in "Run to the Hills". I found that bit very hard to read actually - I didn't want there to have ever been any chance, however small, of it not having worked, since it's so fantastic now.I am pretty sure that Steve mentioned that he would have gotten rid of Adrian first if the reunion didn't work with BNW.
He's been in Iron Maiden, now, twice as long as he was the first time. That's not an accident.
Let them think that, if it makes them happy (I suspect it actually doesn't, but that's their problem). The rest of us will stick around for Maiden's future ...Oh, but a lot of people don't care. I sometimes have the feeling that there is a widespread attitude that Maiden's history ended in 1988/1993/2000.
I completely agree. I've always said that this is Janick's greatest contributions to the band. The Reunion Era seems to be all about personal chemistry in the band. I feel like Janick bridges every personal gap.I will say this - you never do see Steve doing interviews alongside Bruce or Adrian, whereas Janick might be seen along all other five members. He very much might be the glue keeping things together. There's been so many rumours over the last 17 years that Adrian was upset over one thing or another, but he hasn't come close to leaving. He's been in Iron Maiden, now, twice as long as he was the first time. That's not an accident.
Janicks role in Maiden overall, post reunion and since joining, is more important, IN MY OPINION, than Dave Murray. He is a fantastic song writer and has contributed to some of their best songs. Not only that, his solo in Blood Brothers is the best solo done by any Maiden guitarist ever.
Take it as you will, but that is my opinion. Believe me, I would never want Murray to go but what has he done better, songwriting wise, since Gers joined?
Janick song writings are good, solos are good. But he is so corny to watch live...all that weird pracing/marching and leg lifting/stretching...is all a bit kooky.
Like when all three of the Amigos go "ooh ooh ooh" into the mike like a bunch of Motown backing singers? I think Janick seems to be the ringleader of that one ...I think some of his on stage antics are tongue in cheek.
But in a way, it almost humanizes the experience. Music, especially live music, is meant to be fun. Janick provides a great outlet for the fans that are looking to just have fun at a show.Janick song writings are good, solos are good. But he is so corny to watch live...all that weird pracing/marching and leg lifting/stretching...is all a bit kooky.
"Humanizes" is a very interesting way of putting it, but I think it's significant that he's not showing off (and I know no-one here has suggested that so don't all jump on me). The majority of his stage theatrics seem to be quite spontaneous and I think he often gets carried away without thinking about where he's going next, which is why it sometimes seems a bit ungainly. But a lot of the guitarists who did similar theatrics in the past (particularly in 80's hair metal) were basically showing off - it was all obviously choreographed and rehearsed (and self-concious). I think it's at least partly this connotation that leads @GhostSword and others to find it all a bit cringeworthy.But in a way, it almost humanizes the experience. Music, especially live music, is meant to be fun. Janick provides a great outlet for the fans that are looking to just have fun at a show.