Samantas5855
Ancient Mariner
Spot on, most modern Harris are kinda similar, too long and sometimes boring
No one can create long songs, intros and melodies (and in general, songs) like Steve! No one. Far from being similar or boring.Spot on, most modern Harris are kinda similar, too long and sometimes boring
Cool intro and melodies.A Finnish Maiden podcast made... somewhat humoristic video about the songwriting, playing and composition tropes of Maiden, with particular focusing on Steve Harris and at the end of the video there is a "parody-tribute"/demonstration of that - The Yeoman.
Timestamped at the beginning of the song. I think that at least the intro is very, very spot-on. A bit of a Mother Russia meets The Nomad, Dance of Death and Death of the Celts/Hell on Earth or something.
No one can create long songs, intros and melodies (and in general, songs) like Steve! No one. Far from being similar or boring.
The single was shorter tho, it was the actual runtime, the album version had a copy pasted pasted chorus in the mastering stage which is even worse. At least with the angle and the gambler an even shorter version exists.No one can come up with chorus repeat of The Angel and the Gambler and put it out as a first single and just walk it off like Steve. No one.
Right, right... I agree that Steve has a brilliant sense of drama and melodies and the way he wiggles it with E-C-D is magical and quite unmatched. However, I think the criticism also has it's place. While Steve's stubbornness is probably the reason why Maiden still exists on this level, it's also one of the main reasons behind the biggest issues on their output over the past couple of decades. I suppose it's bit of a ying-yang thing or whatever.
love ya, 'Arry!
The single was shorter tho, it was the actual runtime, the album version had a copy pasted pasted chorus in the mastering stage which is even worse. At least with the angle and the gambler an even shorter version exists.
The long version of TAATG was a mistake, I agree (Steve wanted this to be the live version of the song). On the other hand, the single short version should have been with a third verse and both solos. When you remove the repetition, this is actually a decent song (4-6 minutes long). Since we have both a long and a short version of the song, I think Steve realised his mistake.No one can come up with chorus repeat of The Angel and the Gambler and put it out as a first single and just walk it off like Steve. No one.
However, I think the criticism also has it's place. While Steve's stubbornness is probably the reason why Maiden still exists on this level, it's also one of the main reasons behind the biggest issues on their output over the past couple of decades.
A Finnish Maiden podcast made... somewhat humoristic video about the songwriting, playing and composition tropes of Maiden, with particular focusing on Steve Harris and at the end of the video there is a "parody-tribute"/demonstration of that - The Yeoman.
Timestamped at the beginning of the song. I think that at least the intro is very, very spot-on. A bit of a Mother Russia meets The Nomad, Dance of Death and Death of the Celts/Hell on Earth or something.
--But this is not a special insight.
Other than that, I found this boring, not what Steve writes.
Come on, that was 24 years ago! How can you rely on such an old example to make a judgment? He has certainly written some mediocre/average or even bad songs, but he has penned so many masterpieces.No one can come up with chorus repeat of The Angel and the Gambler and put it out as a first single and just walk it off like Steve. No one.
Maybe it was edited by Harris/Newton co.at 9:30 never heard Maiden do this before. Could someone have an explanation why they decided not to play this part? I would understand If it was something like Top of The pops where they have Time limit , but this is regular concert
Come on, that was 24 years ago! How can you rely on such an old example to make a judgment? He has certainly written some mediocre/average or even bad songs, but he has penned so many masterpieces.
You can clearly see the video is not edited they just decided to not play the bass/drum solo. Only time i heard they do that.Maybe it was edited by Harris/Newton co.
Seriously I have no idea.
Come on, that was 24 years ago! How can you rely on such an old example to make a judgment? He has certainly written some mediocre/average or even bad songs, but he has penned so many masterpieces.
HIDDEN GEMYou can clearly see the video is not edited they just decided to not play the bass/drum solo. Only time i heard they do that.
You can clearly see the video is not edited they just decided to not play the bass/drum solo. Only time i heard they do that.