I am afraid I was more serious than some people like out here. I know, of course it's all opinion (we've had a couple of medal awarded discussions about this already) but I'll spend another post on this.
As with Rime, I do not think that Dante is not just "a long song" that consists out of stitched parts. Thank God it has many parts that are connected. It really works. As with Rime, I find Dante the highlight of both the studio album it's on and the 1st live album that followed. Both songs have also something in common when you relate these songs to the rest of the catalogue. They are two of the greatest examples of long and entertaining songs. Full of darkness, atmosphere and sudden changes. Both songs have superb riffing passages. Both keep you at the edge of your seat. There's so many other long songs that don't have these qualities. They lack adventure, they lack unpredictable changes. They drag, are repetitive, dull, monotone, unoriginal or predictable.
Both songs are not easy songs to play, and both bands have been careful about not playing them too often for other reasons. Crown jewels are only put out in special occasions, every once in a while, to keep it special. In Dante's case, there were also technical reasons why it wasn't played for so long.
Look, I know some people don't like it (that can happen of forums; people not liking posts by others), but I'll say that I find it ridiculous that slow, dragging, melancholic and repetitive stuff like Question of Heaven is more popular than Dante, on a Maiden fan forum.
Instead of staying amazed about this, in the end it's better to accept it and I do that by reasoning. My reasoning is that I have the idea that most people who vote in this topic favour songs with build-ups like Question (and other ingredients they like in this song: do explain! What on earth makes this song worthy of a top 3 position?) over the more adventurous and less predictable music that makes me happy.