Black Wizard
Pleb Hunter
We're in lockdown. Anything goes.Also can't quite believe there's a debate going on about the correct usage of 'wank' type terms in a musical context.
We're in lockdown. Anything goes.Also can't quite believe there's a debate going on about the correct usage of 'wank' type terms in a musical context.
"Wankery", "pointless", "just noise" or "not listenable" are regards that surprise me in any review. And are obviously unjustifiable.
...
Now ask yourselves this: are these observations fair overall? And why? You'll surely answer no and that it's "just the listener's opinion" that may be "completely out of context" or those are people "lacking of a trained hear" labeling them "musically square" or even having "bad taste". If you pondered slightly about these approaches by now you'll be getting my point.
Easy: one thing is labeling something "wankery" or "noise". Other completely different is saying "I don't like it", "I hate it", "it's not my cup of tea" or "it bores me", "it does nothing for me" or even finding a song "generic", "unoriginal", "over the top", "weak", "great", "amazing", "garbage"... whatever. Your answer is about the later cases: an approach that is totally fair no matter how harsh it can be because it portraits an individual approach a mere opinion and that's ok as you said. The earlier is trying to stick a factual label into something regarding one's personal opinions (i.e. "noise" and "music" have totally distinct meanings). Ok... sometimes people say it to reinforce a personal approach (in that case I understand it) but many times that's not the case... and saying that something is merely "wankery" or "noise" just because we feel so is an unfortunately systematic exercise in presumption and self centered behavior IMO.Sure, I'll be saying that's their opinion. When I at least see adjectives like those, I just automatically say that's just how they felt while hearing the song... The same way when anyone says this song is good, beautiful, touching, epic.
I don't understand then how those statements are unjustifiable? That's how you (or at the very least, how I) express an opinion, whether positive or negative.
It doesn't matter if the reviewer thinks they're the voice of God, and that what they said is axiomatic. They still just stated an opinion, as valid as the next guy's, even if the words are harsh.
Well, if I understand what you're saying, I don't disagree. If I'll call a track "just noise", it's because it's so loud and doesn't fulfill what I expect from music, that's a bit how Scum was for me. But I'm not actually meaning to say it's literally noise i.e. the dictionary definition of noise. In this case it's basically an exaggerated way of saying "this is trash".Easy: one thing is labeling something "wankery" or "noise". Other completely different is saying "I don't like it", "I hate it", "it's not my cup of tea" or "it bores me", "it does nothing for me" or even finding a song "generic", "unoriginal", "over the top", "weak", "great", "amazing", "garbage"... whatever. Your answer is about the later cases: an approach that is totally fair no matter how harsh it can be because it portraits an individual approach a mere opinion and that's ok as you said. The earlier is trying to stick a factual label into something regarding one's personal opinions (i.e. "noise" and "music" have totally distinct meanings). Ok... sometimes people say it to reinforce a personal approach (in that case I understand it) but many times that's not the case... and saying that something is merely "wankery" or "noise" just because we feel so is an unfortunately systematic exercise in presumption and self centered behavior IMO.
Some of the dictionary definitions of "noise" definitely do apply to crap like Napalm Death:If I'll call a track "just noise", it's because it's so loud and doesn't fulfill what I expect from music, that's a bit how Scum was for me. But I'm not actually meaning to say it's literally noise i.e. the dictionary definition of noise. In this case it's basically an exaggerated way of saying "this is trash".
See your points and 100% agree.Well, if I understand what you're saying, I don't disagree. If I'll call a track "just noise", it's because it's so loud and doesn't fulfill what I expect from music, that's a bit how Scum was for me. But I'm not actually meaning to say it's literally noise i.e. the dictionary definition of noise. In this case it's basically an exaggerated way of saying "this is trash".
About the last part: it's unfortunate that some think they can reduce music to those terms, just because "it feels like it's noise" or "it feels self indulgent". That's what my ending sentence was about - they're still only stating their opinion, even if they think they're using the defined terms.
Saying "this is noise" will always mean "this sounds like noise does to me", it's just that some people can't separate their feelings from reality and believe that if they feel so, it's literal noise...
You sir managed to be dryly meaner to virtuosos you don't like than I could ever be in my harshest diatribes eheheheheh .I actually thought it was reserved purely for excessive amounts of fast guitar playing (ie lots of reptitive fast hand movements) that are done for the hell of it rather than contributing to the quality of the music.
Bahhhh I saw Collins and thought about @CollinSome of the dictionary definitions of "noise" definitely do apply to crap like Napalm Death:
one that lacks agreeable musical quality or is noticeably unpleasant (Merriam-Webster)
a sound or sounds, especially when it is unwanted, unpleasant, or loud (Cambridge)
a loud or unpleasant sound (Collins)
If you can't hear the purpose or direction in a piece of music, I think that is on you.@Mosh I think "wanking" is for when the music has no sense purpose or direction, just some guys jamming and having the audacity (in the ears of the listener that is) to release this as music, and not just instrumentals (DT is sometimes accused of this, even in songs with LaBrie...)
I think it has far more meaning than most buzz words you see on forums. It's meaning is the musician is pleasuring himself rather than the listener with the piece of music, it's masturbatory.
Some people just get a kick out of watching others do something self indulgent.What is more self indulgent and masturbatory than Iron Maiden playing A Matter of Life and Death in its entirety live when people came to hear Run to the Hills?
Agreed... what some people consider to be completely pointless may be a well defined design to others and vice versa. It depends on the listener.If you can't hear the purpose or direction in a piece of music, I think that is on you.
This is a fact... as the metal god himself stated: "from jazz and electricity and good old southern blues".Improvised music has existed for many centuries and makes up a lot of what rock and metal developed out of. While it's not really my thing, there are entire genres of rock music that are entirely based around jamming.
I fail to see self indulgence here. What I see is a band that enjoys so much its new material and is so sure of its quality that played the entirety of the album on the first tour because they knew it would become a favorite among many fans (as it did). Even if I disliked AMOLAD I must applaud how a 30 year old veteran act has the balls to pull that out when the majority of bands with the same age were playing it safe living almost entirity from their past reportoire.What is more self indulgent and masturbatory than Iron Maiden playing A Matter of Life and Death in its entirety live when people came to hear Run to the Hills?
Most music that is enjoyed around here was created for the musicians' own pleasure. Those musicians were fortunate to find an audience that also appreciated that sort of thing, but the listener's preferences are usually the last thing that is considered. Some exceptions, such as classical music that was patronized by a church/monarchy or a lot of top 40 material, but just about everything in this game so far has been "masturbatory" in the way you describe. With that in mind, I fail to see how the term is descriptive.
I think this is the essence of art in many ways.Some people just get a kick out of watching others do something self indulgent.