Forostar
Ancient Mariner
I took the liberty to make some slight changes.
Thankfully, some still managed to look at all these records as different entities. The Maiden records, especially The X-Factor (imo) have good things on them. Naturally one has to be open for it and like it, to appreciate it. The "open" part seems easy, but I bet it wasn't for many. Constantly comparing with Bruce was in the way of good judgement for many.I think a big part of the issue was the inevitable comparison between Maiden's output and Bruce & Adrian's output during the same timeframe. For many people, 1995-1998 showed Bruce & Adrian putting out some of the strongest work of their career (minus Psycho Motel's State Of Mind) while Maiden put out some of the weakest work of theirs. This, combined with Blaze's performance issues and poor album sales, made late 90s Maiden look like a shell of the band they used to be.
Imo (dis)liking these albums does not purely need to be connected only to Blaze('s performance). There's a lot of music on there as well. If a big deal of the music (and e.g. a fair share of the vocals e.g. without offkey moments) is appreciated, an album as a whole can be appreciated as well, when focusing on its own identity.In situations like this, people's opinions tend to be formed by either loyalty or merit. Some people genuinely enjoyed the new twist Blaze brought to the group, and they liked the dark vibe on The X Factor. Some people didn't like Blaze very much, but they were loyal Iron Maiden fans, so they actively defended the choice and tried to find ways to enjoy the new music anyway.SomeA lot of people hated Blaze irrationally because they were loyal Bruce fans and he wasn't Bruce, and those people would have rejected him regardless of how well he sang. And some people like myself gave Blaze a fair shake, but were heavily disappointed by his performance and couldn't find a way to enjoy most of the new material.
Last edited: