The part about it not being as accessible as what fans were used to, I get that. I got heavy into Maiden in '93, found out Blaze was coming in, and hunted down as much Wolfsbane as I could find to see what he sounded like. Knowing he didn't sound like Bruce, I adjusted my expectations, and was still underwhelmed. It was dark, it didn't have the energy that the older stuff had, so many slow intros, and the production was a bit lifeless and everything sounded oddly separated rather than cohesive. Even the Blaze I'd come to expect wasn't there. Instead of the crazy howler I thought we were getting, he was deeply measured and not very explosive vocally.
It took me a LOT of spins before it clicked. Now I listen to it more regularly than some of the "golden age" Maiden albums, and with the cut B-sides in the tracklist. It's part of the reason why I dug Virtual XI when it came out, is that it fixed a lot of those problems. Production is brighter, Blaze sounds a lot more confident, and we get more shorter, straight-to-the-point rockers. It felt like a stab at recapturing the '80s sound, but a lot of time it feels like most people slag it off because, "oh, that's the one with 'Angel and the Gambler' on it, isn't it?" and that alone equals the album sucking. It's far from a perfect album, I'll be the first to admit. The football theme is only cool if you're Steve Harris. TAATG is basically a crowd-participation live arrangement song done in the studio for some wacky reason. Nicko phoned it in. But...I still enjoy it.