My Astronomy professor did this with us back in Uni and well.... it's BS. Surprise, surprise. He had us read 12 little paragraphs describing someone and asked, "Which one best describes you?" Everyone said, "All of them contain a little bit of truth, but none FULLY describe me." He said, "Those are astrological sign "personality" descriptions. So if you thought you were a typical Gemini, You're either more of a Leo or your really neither.... "I don't either believe or disbelieve this, what would be interesting to see correlations between personality test and the natal chart. One is psychology, other is astrology, one maybe more serious than the other but both are poo science.
Also there are patterns that one can experience, and those are patterns, real patterns at least for my environment, where characteristic attributes of a zodiac sign are displayed by someone.
Interesting. science goes ahead and justifies. I am scared of all these researches ...."Weather pains, weather-related pain, or meteoropathy is a phenomenon that occurs when people with conditions such as arthritis or limb injuries claim to feel pain, particularly with changes in barometric pressure, humidity or other weather phenomena. Scientific evidence, however, does not support a connection between weather and pain, and concludes that it is largely or entirely due to perceptual errors such as confirmation bias."
I'm looking for the right stimulus. to help me search and immerse myself in a research on a topic ..I can agree with that.
No, it's just not black and white.