50th Anniversary Documentary Announcement

@Luisma - I mean this in the nicest possible way: You're using this board extensively as free ad space. Pretty much every post you make is a plug for your books. I don't know how many books you sold just from the ads on this board alone, but I know it's at least two, the ones I bought. Considering the prices you charge, you've likely made quite a bit of money on space that we provide for you for free. But this place is not a billboard, it's a forum. You have to live with the fact that people will be critical of your strategy, and even of the product you provide. Call it negativity if you like, but it's not a good look for you if you're making a fuss of every backlash that you get, at least not in a place that you've been using as free ad space.
Hi @Perun, thank you for your reply. Let me just say this: when people started complaining about the book being sold, I simply stopped posting because some were far too aggressive. As you said, this is a forum, and I understand that we’re all free to share—respectfully—what we know or want to discuss. The forum also helps Maiden fans connect, and from what I’ve seen, some fans are genuinely interested in certain details that I, along with other researchers, have taken the time and effort to uncover. That said, a forum isn’t always the best place to disclose all the information some people are looking for, because it would be too long, or too laborious to give all the details. There's also the fact that there's a price for certain things, and for work done... And I just can't understand why people decide to pay over and over and over for let's say, magazines, that bring the same information and the same pictures that, as @Vaenyr mentioned, repeat the same thing a million times!

Man, I honestly try to give Maiden fans something different, whether is information and details that I, who have collected things from the band for over 30 years now, have never seen anywhere before... People want to criticise that, ok, I do get it, but there's a line and that is respect man.

In any case, I leave you all be... But I do invite you and other people to think why is it that some people that have knowledge on the band, stopped speaking about it whether it is in the forum or other place.. The same as why the bootlegs of before 79 aren't doing the rounds...
 
Mate, I have absolutely nothing against you, but it seems to me you lot still don't understand each other. Nobody is criticising the fact you're trying to give Maiden fans something different.

I have a dear friend of mine who recently started doing business on Instagram and other social networks. And I nearly stopped following her everywhere, because the mode of communication started to be, well... a bit like yours. The person (and especially one whom we only know through their internet presence) suddenly disappears in the business talk, with positive, marketable statements, hints and recommendations and so on. But it's also kinda personal, unofficial, it's this weird mixture of both. Anyway, even if it's honestly meant, it feels "fake". I call it "influencer mode".

Your approach - at least from what I gather browsing the forum - seem to be a lot about hype-building and advertising yourself. And I'm not saying it's not legit or that your product's not worth it, others have said you do a lot of good research, but the way you advertise it is more or less plain obvious.
And of course you're completely free to do that.

Just... once you switch into the influencer mode, there are going to be some people who'll find it rather off-putting. This is where I feel the hostility or the disagreement here seems to originate. That's the problem, not that ungrateful fans don't want to hear any spicy new info.

I'm not on any sides here, for example Maiden absolute early days don't interest me in the slightest (wouldn't want information about that for free, let alone to pay for it), so I'm quite distanced from this all. Just a word to the wise, don't take it as an offence.

----

Besides that (and let's get this thread back on track), I really hope that whatever the documentary's going to be, that it's going to pay more attention to the other eras than those early ones that I feel have been done to death. But I'm not having my hopes up.
 
The early days are by far the least interesting era of the band for me. I genuinely do not care at all about that. The 80s stuff has been pretty well documented as well.

If I could choose I'd love to get some stuff for the 90s. The decline of the Dickinson era, the Blaze era, the buildup to the reunion. Then I'd want some more information about the reunion era, particularly DOD and AMOLAD, where the "freshness" of getting back together for BNW has somewhat faded and they had to find a way to get into a new routine.

That said, I'm pretty sure those things won't be touched upon (or barely referenced at all) and that we'll mostly focus on the 80s and the success of the SBIT tour.
 
Last edited:
Before we get things back on track, I just want to chip in as I'm wondering if my post was one of the ones you felt was hostile @Luisma , so I want to make myself a bit clearer.

First off, absolutely no hostility was meant at all, I'm sorry if it came off that way.

I have no doubt that you have/had connections to the band, nor do I want to discredit your work, nor do I think you're wrong to not want to reveal everything you've written, and I understand that you may not be allowed to say everything you want to due to confidentiality agreements. I simply find it difficult to take the word of someone on the Internet that I know nothing about, especially in this day and age of AI bullshit and fake news. It's all too easy for someone to come along and post vague hints that they might know something but are "unable to share it", and if the only way to find out whether your word is true is by parting with my money, then yeah, I am going to be more sceptical.

This is why I asked others what they've seen you post to make them sure of your word. I didn't mean it as "this guy is blatantly lying, how could you believe him?!", but more genuine curiosity... and maybe a little bit of the aforementioned scepticism. I have seen a few comments from you responding to others' speculations that are along the lines of "Well, just you wait and see...!", which doesn't really confirm or deny anything. I'm not saying this is all your posts, but I don't follow this board particularly closely and I'm not going to go back and comb through every thread. I do have other things to do. :lol:
 
Or that a book of Derek Riggs’ sketches and artwork was planned to be released alongside Best of the Beast in 1996?
A Riggs book with artworks and sketches to go alongside BOTB in 1996! Super detailed? Wow, why didn't we get that. If I'm not mistaken, I think I read about such a book in an interview with Derek (he also apparently created 40 artworks with Eddie around 1992). He (or was it Steve) also talked about one giant artwork with all the Eddies.
That said, I'm pretty sure those things won't be touched upon (or barely referenced at all) and that we'll mostly focus on the 80s and the success of the SBIT tour.
The 90's and Reunion era are the most interesting. If I have to guess for the documentary: the whole 80's era (mainly; ''detailed'' for the first 3 albums, Powerslave and idk, SSOASS/Donington?), LAD '92 (probably), something for the Blaze era, BNW (and early Reunion era like the unique 2006 tour), SBIT, TBOS(?), Legacy tour and SJ/Future Past tour.
 
For instance, did you know the Eddie Head Box Set was originally supposed to be fully painted and look way better?
If I recall correctly around the time I got mine, you could download painting instructions or something from the Maiden site to do paint it up properly yourself...or that's a Mandela Effect thing I'm misremembering.
The earl days are by far the least interesting era of the band for me. I genuinely do not care at all about that. The 80s stuff has been pretty well documented as well.

If I could choose I'd love to get some stuff for the 90s. The decline of the Dickinson era, the Blaze era, the buildup to the reunion. Then I'd want some more information about the reunion era, particularly DOD and AMOLAD, where the "freshness" of getting back together for BNW has somewhat faded and they had to find a way to get into a new routine.
Amen. So tired of the heaps of documentation in regards to the genesis of the band and the first few years. It's been beaten to death, we all know it, and we're undoubtedly going to get a HUGE new helping of it when the documentary comes out. The 90s is by far the juiciest era as far as interesting things going on in and around the band...and it's the least documented. The reunion era is also woefully thin when it comes to being covered by the band.
 
The earl days are by far the least interesting era of the band for me. I genuinely do not care at all about that. The 80s stuff has been pretty well documented as well.

If I could choose I'd love to get some stuff for the 90s. The decline of the Dickinson era, the Blaze era, the buildup to the reunion. Then I'd want some more information about the reunion era, particularly DOD and AMOLAD, where the "freshness" of getting back together for BNW has somewhat faded and they had to find a way to get into a new routine.

That said, I'm pretty sure those things won't be touched upon (or barely referenced at all) and that we'll mostly focus on the 80s and the success of the SBIT tour.
90s and early 00s. there are few interviews about reunion. and i hope blaze and both albunz its on the documentaty
 
Mate, I have absolutely nothing against you, but it seems to me you lot still don't understand each other. Nobody is criticising the fact you're trying to give Maiden fans something different.

I have a dear friend of mine who recently started doing business on Instagram and other social networks. And I nearly stopped following her everywhere, because the mode of communication started to be, well... a bit like yours. The person (and especially one whom we only know through their internet presence) suddenly disappears in the business talk, with positive, marketable statements, hints and recommendations and so on. But it's also kinda personal, unofficial, it's this weird mixture of both. Anyway, even if it's honestly meant, it feels "fake". I call it "influencer mode".

Your approach - at least from what I gather browsing the forum - seem to be a lot about hype-building and advertising yourself. And I'm not saying it's not legit or that your product's not worth it, others have said you do a lot of good research, but the way you advertise it is more or less plain obvious.
And of course you're completely free to do that.

Just... once you switch into the influencer mode, there are going to be some people who'll find it rather off-putting. This is where I feel the hostility or the disagreement here seems to originate. That's the problem, not that ungrateful fans don't want to hear any spicy new info.

I'm not on any sides here, for example Maiden absolute early days don't interest me in the slightest (wouldn't want information about that for free, let alone to pay for it), so I'm quite distanced from this all. Just a word to the wise, don't take it as an offence.

----

Besides that (and let's get this thread back on track), I really hope that whatever the documentary's going to be, that it's going to pay more attention to the other eras than those early ones that I feel have been done to death. But I'm not having my hopes up.
Thank you for taking the time to reply and explain. Maybe I'm not seeing the whole picture, nor do I fully understand how I present myself or my work, in any case, thank you once again for your words.

As for the thread, for what I understand the documentary will cover all eras of the band, not only the early days
 
Thank you for taking the time to reply and explain. Maybe I'm not seeing the whole picture, nor do I fully understand how I present myself or my work, in any case, thank you once again for your words.

As for the thread, for what I understand the documentary will cover all eras of the band, not only the early days
Do you know how long it will be and what kind of montage formula (filming concept) we may see? THX
 
Before we get things back on track, I just want to chip in as I'm wondering if my post was one of the ones you felt was hostile @Luisma , so I want to make myself a bit clearer.

First off, absolutely no hostility was meant at all, I'm sorry if it came off that way.

I have no doubt that you have/had connections to the band, nor do I want to discredit your work, nor do I think you're wrong to not want to reveal everything you've written, and I understand that you may not be allowed to say everything you want to due to confidentiality agreements. I simply find it difficult to take the word of someone on the Internet that I know nothing about, especially in this day and age of AI bullshit and fake news. It's all too easy for someone to come along and post vague hints that they might know something but are "unable to share it", and if the only way to find out whether your word is true is by parting with my money, then yeah, I am going to be more sceptical.

This is why I asked others what they've seen you post to make them sure of your word. I didn't mean it as "this guy is blatantly lying, how could you believe him?!", but more genuine curiosity... and maybe a little bit of the aforementioned scepticism. I have seen a few comments from you responding to others' speculations that are along the lines of "Well, just you wait and see...!", which doesn't really confirm or deny anything. I'm not saying this is all your posts, but I don't follow this board particularly closely and I'm not going to go back and comb through every thread. I do have other things to do. :lol:
Thank you for your reply @Edington. I didn't feel any hostility in your part and I do get your sceptism. In any case let me just clarify to you and all other here my story.
My name is Luis Mariano, a 51 years old lawyer from Venezuela. I first discovered Iron Maiden on a Sunday afternoon in 1981. My dad had taken my brother and me to a record store and told us we could each pick an album. Back then, my musical taste was still unformed, so I gravitated towards the metal section—those covers just looked cooler. That’s when I found myself face to face with a yellow zombie. I didn’t know his name then, but I later learned he was Eddie.

My mum wasn’t too thrilled about the choice, so I left the store with a Smurfs album instead. Still, Eddie’s image stuck with me.

I had a few more encounters with Maiden throughout my childhood, but it wasn’t until 1990 that I bought my first record: No Prayer for the Dying. Honestly, it didn’t do much for me. But I gave them another shot and picked up Somewhere in Time. The moment I heard “Wasted Years,” I was Maidenised.

From then on, I became obsessed—collecting records, CDs, EPs, pins, stickers, and press clippings. Being a collector wasn’t easy in those pre-internet days, but I soaked up every bit of Maiden I could find.

Then came the web. I started archiving everything: interviews, articles, fan pages. At one point, I dreamt of creating a site even bigger than Baeleron’s Iron Maiden Commentary. But with zero web design skills, that plan was shelved. Still, I had all this organised information… and nowhere to share it.

That’s when the idea for a book was born.

The first was an eBook—Detailed Discography of the Beast, 1158 pages packed with Maiden lore (now partially available in print on Lulu.com). Next came Eddie Made Me Do It (The Rise of the Beast 1975–1987), a shorter 249-page eBook that laid the groundwork for this project—with the key difference being new comments and rare interviews.

When I first released Eddie Made Me Do It, I knew it was only the beginning—a rough draft in a larger quest to uncover the hidden history of Iron Maiden. At the time, some stories were still missing, and key interviews were only aspirations. But I was determined to create something that would resonate with fans—something fresh, filled with untold tales and newly confirmed details. As I had been lucky to meet and share time and beers with a good part of the Killer Krew two times in 2008, and had kept in touch with some of them, I started picking their brains and collecting stories. They also helped me gain the trust of more people related to the band.

Anyway, the interviews I did conduct, in person or via the internet cover all eras of the band and the life of Steve Harris. The interviewees are:
Dave Smith, Paul Sears, Dennis Wilcock, Keith Wilfort, Dave "Lights" Beasley, Barry "Thunderstick" Purkis, Doug Sampson, Bob Hooker, and Paul Lewis. I also had some small chats with Bob Sawyer over FB.

Pippa Lang, Neal Kay, Dennis Stratton, Derek Riggs, Manu Da Silva, Ian Morton (the dancer in The Number of the Beast video), Jim Yukich (Director of 'Flight Of Icarus', 'Wasted Years' and of course, Live After Death), Andy Curran, Sue Gornall (Steve's first girlfriend), Steve Lazarus, Terry Rance, Paul Di’Anno, Masa Itoh, Adrian Smith, Bruce Dickinson, Kenny Feuerman (director of ’Ello Texas and Behind the Iron Curtain), Andy Curran (close frien of Steve Harris) and Marc Fairburn (tattoo artist responsible for the iconic ink on Steve, Dave, and Nicko).

Jeffrey Hammer, better known as Doo Dah or Mr. Spuds Daily – a former record shop owner who ran Texas Tapes & Records, and very close friend of Nicko.

Andrzej Marzec – a former Pagart employee who organised Maiden’s concerts behind the Iron Curtain.

Roman Rogowiecki – a Polish rock journalist who served as Maiden’s translator during those shows.

Zdzisław Smektała – a seasoned journalist from Wrocław.

László Hegedűs – organiser of the 1984 concert in Budapest.

Neil Smith – member of the Artful Dodgers.

Roberto Medina – creator of the Rock in Rio festival.

Julian Doyle – director of the Can I Play with Madness promo video.

Lorrainian Roach-Hills – who met Paul Fowler, the man behind the giant walking-hanging Eddies.

Gino Micallef – bassist of the German band High 'N' Dry, close friend of Steve.

Andrew Chapman – an American journalist who collaborated with Nicko McBrain on the book Iron Maiden and Nicko McBrain's Rhythms of the Beast and spent ten days with the band in Cologne in 1988.

Darren Broughton – vocalist of The Nod, the band who supported Maiden in New Zealand in 1992.

Denis Sedov – a Russian Iron Maiden fan.

Phil Hilborne.

I also want to address something @Perun mentioned. Believe it or not, self-publishing a book isn't that profitable—I make less than 30% of the price of each copy sold.

And just to clarify: when I mention my book, it's not to sell it (though that's a nice bonus), but to give people context—which is also the reason I wrote this post in the first place. I think that if I mention my book, people can just look up who I am, and then read my answer with a bit more knowledge of from where my answer comes.

I do love to give Maiden fans answers, because, after all that's how all my own work begun, wanting to know more about the band... And that's still what I want to do... As I said, we all share a common love and that's the band... All eras in my case.

And to get back to the thread... I know for a fact that some of the people I mentioned above were interviewed for the documentary so I expect the documentary be very interesting...

In any case, if I am able to answer any question about the band, I'll gladly do it with the knowledge I have. Thank you all for reading and sorry if I have bothered some
 
Last edited:
Do you know how long it will be and what kind of montage formula (filming concept) we may see? THX
For what I understand it will be at least 2 hours, I know many interviews were conducted, so I think it will be something like the early days series. I also understand they will show some archive footage. To be honest I thought it was going to be a series and not a one time thing.
 
A Riggs book with artworks and sketches to go alongside BOTB in 1996! Super detailed? Wow, why didn't we get that. If I'm not mistaken, I think I read about such a book in an interview with Derek (he also apparently created 40 artworks with Eddie around 1992). He (or was it Steve) also talked about one giant artwork with all the Eddies.

The 90's and Reunion era are the most interesting. If I have to guess for the documentary: the whole 80's era (mainly; ''detailed'' for the first 3 albums, Powerslave and idk, SSOASS/Donington?), LAD '92 (probably), something for the Blaze era, BNW (and early Reunion era like the unique 2006 tour), SBIT, TBOS(?), Legacy tour and SJ/Future Past tour.

The crazy thing about the book is that Derek wasn't personally involved at that time... About the giant artwork you mention, Derek did work on that but for one reason or the other the management scrapped the idea and that's why we ended up with the bad collage of Eddies in the inside of the booklet of the Best Of The Beast. As the sleeve, the original idea was that Derek would paint a whole series (at least 3) new artwork with various Eddies.
 
If I recall correctly around the time I got mine, you could download painting instructions or something from the Maiden site to do paint it up properly yourself...or that's a Mandela Effect thing I'm misremembering.

Amen. So tired of the heaps of documentation in regards to the genesis of the band and the first few years. It's been beaten to death, we all know it, and we're undoubtedly going to get a HUGE new helping of it when the documentary comes out. The 90s is by far the juiciest era as far as interesting things going on in and around the band...and it's the least documented. The reunion era is also woefully thin when it comes to being covered by the band.
I do seem to recall something like that but not entirely sure, however, I do remember is that pictures of the pre-production of the 'Ead were shown in the IM website and looked just awesome! Very detailed... Then they said it was going to cost too much to paint the whole lot and we ended up with just the green head...

A similar thing happened with the casket... To the thing in real metal, according to the management, was just going to be to expensive so we ended up with what we have...

As for the documentary, for what I know, it will cover all eras from the band, not stopping on a particular era.
 
The early days are by far the least interesting era of the band for me. I genuinely do not care at all about that. The 80s stuff has been pretty well documented as well.

If I could choose I'd love to get some stuff for the 90s. The decline of the Dickinson era, the Blaze era, the buildup to the reunion. Then I'd want some more information about the reunion era, particularly DOD and AMOLAD, where the "freshness" of getting back together for BNW has somewhat faded and they had to find a way to get into a new routine.

That said, I'm pretty sure those things won't be touched upon (or barely referenced at all) and that we'll mostly focus on the 80s and the success of the SBIT tour.
I just want them to give the honest truth about the whole thing... Not the "Oh! Adrian decided to quit because he thought the band was playing too fast", "The got rid of Blaze because the pressures of the record label"...
 
For what I understand it will be at least 2 hours, I know many interviews were conducted, so I think it will be something like the early days series. I also understand they will show some archive footage. To be honest I thought it was going to be a series and not a one time thing.
Thx a lot, they can stream docum via platforms as series of 30 min long episodes.
 
Well, in part the filming of the documentary did had some budget cuts, so...
This is why I've always criticized Rod Smallwood and his mentality. He's not about how to invest more and earn much and much, but just how to cut the costs and earn a lot less than he should. IF IRON MAIDEN HAD BETTER MANAGEMENT, THEY'D BE EVEN BIGGER. PERIOD
 
Back
Top