USA Politics

And still, you don’t have the guts to admit that not everything the Democrats did was right or timely.
Huh? I've criticized the Dems time and time again and have clearly stated multiple times over literal months what my grievances with them are, namely that they are moving to the right, which is a losing strategy.

Funny how the mods rolled out strict rules about no name-calling or personal attacks, yet here you are calling Alice Cooper a “washed-out rocker.”
Is Alice Cooper a forum member? Do I have to be respectful when talking about Trump or Putin as well? If you think I crossed a like, report my comment and let the mods/admins deal with it.

Honestly, I think he’s far from uninformed. The guy travels constantly and talks to people from all walks of life. He’s not living in a bubble, and I believe he’s speaking some truth.
Easy counter examples: Ted Nugent and Jon Schaffer. Traveling doesn't automatcally inform you.

Both U.S. parties need to sit down and have a real, grown-up conversation. One side needs to rein it in a bit, and the other needs to be more open to change. That’s the only way we’re going to end up with future presidents who are sane, steady, and actually predictable.
One side is literally descending into fascism. The other wants LGBTQ people to not get lynched. Somehow these things are supposed to be equal lmao

Given recent events I'd love to hear how those who voted for Trump feel about voting for a child rapist. That's far more relevant than a random musician's opinion.
 
Alice's claim is verifiably untrue
Of course different candidates polled differently, and issue potency was more of a factor than the perceived wokeness of the Democratic brand; but it is true that the “D” next to someone’s name makes them politically poisonous in large swaths of the country due to that perceived wokeness of the party.

it is undeniable that the only ones focusing on culture war issues were the GOP, not the Dems.
Currently stated positions are meaningless if they’re trumped by historically stated ones, and/or baked-in historical impressions.

An old, washed-out rocker
Ad hominem.

the centrists are butthurt. At this point I'm convinced that if this thread was around during the Civil Rights movement, we'd have multiple people posting dozens upon dozens of comments against the movement.
Lovely — so now you’re intimating that those who disagree with you would be racists if they’d just been born 2 or 3 decades earlier.

Your behavior is no more civilized than that of the supposed mouth-breathers you so gleefully attack left and right. If you wonder why some people hate progressives, take a long, hard look in the mirror.

(Now do your predictable little backpatting strut and put me on ignore again.)
 
Mostly, I just find Alice's quote to be profoundly silly.

If a guy says to a coworker, 'I like your new dress,' that means he now gets fired? That's crazy.

Where did this happen? WTF is he talking about? Is he claiming sexual harassment in the workplace is a "woke" staple? Is it "woke" to have HR at your company? He's not making the point he thinks he is here, and, as usual with most things said by people decrying "wokeness", it sounds like an old man yelling at a cloud.

in a shooting war, you don't want a poodle; you want a pitbull.

Ah yes, because pitbulls are renowned for their superiority with firearms.

Feelings over facts.

Yes, that is all this is. Nothing he's talking about here is factual in any way. It's just more, "I talked to people and IDK they seem bothered by things that are entirely non-specific and have zero reference points! Ahhhhh damn wokeness!"

Both U.S. parties need to sit down and have a real, grown-up conversation. One side needs to rein it in a bit, and the other needs to be more open to change.
Which party needs to do which? Also, neither of those shifts are extreme enough. One side (MAGA) needs to stop being greedy fascists who use racism and sexism in their goal of ultimate power, one side (Dems) needs to actually go all in on anything and stop trying to play to both sides and appease centrists. The other third side (Republicans) need to come out of their hidey holes and actually stand for something again, which they'll never do as long as MAGA lives.

Given recent events I'd love to hear how those who voted for Trump feel about voting for a child rapist.

Who is that? What recent events? If you heard it from anywhere but Trump's mouth, it's obviously all lies. Obama did it!
 
I'm not the kind of person to "report" users on this forum—I don't like that kind of attitude. Back in Stalin's time, people in russia reported or denounced each other just to avoid prison or gain privileges. It’s a mindset I want nothing to do with.
And regarding your previous edit—let’s be honest, the very reason we’re having this conversation is because the Democrats lost to a man with a highly questionable reputation. That alone says a lot about the deeper problems and tensions within society.
 
Last edited:
I'm not the kind of person to "report" users on this forum—I don't like that kind of attitude.
I give you my full blessing. Please go ahead and do it, so that the mods can clear up any confusion. Or should I just report the comment myself?

And regarding your previous edit—let’s be honest, the very reason we’re having this conversation is because the Democrats lost to a man with a highly questionable reputation. That alone says a lot about the deeper problems and tensions within society.
Yes, they lost miserably while moving right and having an objectively more right wing campaign than they did in 2020. Something I've been shouting from the rooftops for months at this point. Turns out left leaning people are not interested in a GOP-lite party. They prefer progressive policies which are overwhelmingly popular across the political spectrum (even conservatives have been polled and voiced support, but turned around once they found out that a Democrat proposed said policy).

I'm not really interested in once again repeating something that has been discussed to death in this thread, multiple times over multiple months. I'll return to the current events and talk about those, rather than arguing about a random musician yelling at clouds over things that aren't actually happening. See ya in a couple of months when the next opinion piece is posted, I suppose. Best of luck in the meantime!
 
You're certainly allowed to make fun of various public figures if you see fit, as long as it's not driving the conversation down a rabbit hole of yelling back and forth, or in the case of Iron Maiden, going to make a moderator invoke the RLonger rule for lessening overall enjoyment. However, don't get upset when someone calls out an hominem, either, especially if you're trying to have a serious political debate.

However, you will all post with a modicum of respect towards one another, and I feel this conversation is trending towards that not being true. That is true of multiple people over the last little bit, so I'm not singling each other out. If you cannot post calmly and politely, without snide comments at each other, then I will thread ban you. And that's not based on who I think is right or wrong, but who cares for this community and treats it with respect.
 
Vaenyr often repeated that Kamala didn’t run on a woke or progressive agenda—and that’s fair. But it’s also fair to acknowledge that, for some people, the situation in the country had already gone too far.
My one counterargument is that this is not a result of reality, but rather a result of propaganda from outlets such as Fox News and the campaigns of Trump and other Republicans.

I live in what’s considered the South and I can tell you that ‘woke’ barely exists here. My partner (a trans man) was discriminated against at work and nothing was done about it despite his HR report (long story). Minorities in America have far from taken over and if ‘woke’ actually exists then I’d love to see it.
 
iu
 
I actually do think there is a conversation to be had about political correctness and how some people on the left engage with ideas that they aren’t comfortable with.

But…

1: The right has problems with this too.

2: I can’t take any argument that uses the term “wokeness” unironically seriously.

3: This all seems secondary to the civil rights violations happening now and the party in power conducting the biggest wealth transfer in history to destroy the middle class. This nebulous discussion on wokeness is the argument that the aristocracy wants you to have because it’s a distraction.
 
I can’t take any argument that uses the term “wokeness” unironically seriously.
I could continue to put it in quotes every time I use it, but the reality is that the right wing has successfully co-opted the term and changed its standard definition. We can keep pretending that isn’t true, or we can accept it and move on. I’ve chosen the latter.

This nebulous discussion on wokeness is the argument that the aristocracy wants you to have because it’s a distra
I feel compelled to point out that you just used the word “wokeness” unironically seriously in the very next argument you made after complaining about it. (And the quotes here are a literal quote, so I’m not being hypocritical in my own use of them.)

As far as the substance of the conversation is concerned, the left needs to have this discussion much more broadly and openly if they want to start winning elections again. One could argue that avoiding that discussion also plays into the hands of the aristocracy.
 
Was I calling something woke or accusing someone/something of wokeness? I think my point was made, as much as you would like to attempt to obfuscate.
 
Was I calling something woke or accusing someone/something of wokeness?
I don’t see where you called that out in your initial complaint as a caveat, but we can all pretend you didn’t make a mistake if that makes you feel better.

And I responded to the substance of your argument too, so I’m not sure where this accusation of obfuscation is coming from.
 
My one counterargument is that this is not a result of reality, but rather a result of propaganda from outlets such as Fox News and the campaigns of Trump and other Republicans.

I live in what’s considered the South and I can tell you that ‘woke’ barely exists here. My partner (a trans man) was discriminated against at work and nothing was done about it despite his HR report (long story). Minorities in America have far from taken over and if ‘woke’ actually exists then I’d love to see it.
I'm sorry to hear that — that sounds incredibly frustrating and unfair.
 
What do people really believe? That is the fundamental question, I think.

Here’s an example of a group of professed anti-racists shooting two Black teenagers, killing one of them, in the incident that ended the CHOP occupation in Seattle’s Capitol Hill district in 2020.


While the act itself was tragic and could be considered an accident, these anti-racist “street fighters” not only never owned up to their culpability but actively tried to obfuscate it.


But wait, here’s a group of “patriots,” many wearing or flying flags with “Blue Lives Matter” on them beating the shit out of the police in DC in 2021.


Hypocrisy? Did they never actually believe in the things they say they believe in and just want to be seen as people with strong convictions? Are their beliefs simply discardable when convenient to them?

I just file it all under “people are dumb.” To me, civil rights and civil liberties for all, an effective economic safety net, and environmental stewardship are important.

But people using their beliefs to justify their bad behavior are jackasses.

I think, too often these days, debates are polarized to the point where each side sees the other as these bad extremes. While these bad extremes exist, most people don’t fall under those categories. They’re somewhere less extreme on the political spectrum.
You raise some good and interesting points. I can mostly agree with the "people are dumb" sentiment.

What I disagree with is the indirect (and maybe not intended?) notion that both extremes are comparable or similar.

For the sake of transparency: I'm obviously very biased on this matter. I'm not American; I'm Greek, but grew up and am living in Germany. I am invested in US politics due to their effect on global politics. Whether we like it or not, what happens in the US ends up directly influencing what happens in my home countries.
I am part of one of those "extremes". I'm a leftist and a socialist. I dislike the effects of late stage capitalism, both on humans (wealth disparity, exploitation of the lower class and the global south) as well as on the planet itself (anthropogenic climate change). These things could probably happen under a different economic system as well, but it's difficult seeing how hyper capitalist endeavors are directly causing destruction all around us, while pretty much all "worst case scenario" predictions by scientists are coming true, much faster than even their most alarming warnings.

I wanted to talk about how, according to the Department of Homeland Security, the largest source of domestic terrorism in the US is by the far right. I used to link to their findings quite often, but I can't find the link at the moment. Haven't looked for it since Trump became president again, but it wouldn't be the first time that useful information was withheld. I guess you'll have to take my word for the following, but you are free to look it up: Left wing extremism in the US is negligible; far right extremism abundant and responsible for most violent incidents in the last decades.

To put it in other terms: The right is championing a man and an administration that is constantly violating the Constitution. ICE got such enormous funding that overshadows most militaries of other countries. Unmarked militias are going through streets kidnapping legal US citizens to get them deported, violating their rights, because they "look foreign". Fascism is on the rise; globally and domestically. And despite all the "we need the 2nd amendment to overthrow a tyrannical government" type arguments that many who are pro-gun brought forth over the years, there's now a large chunk of Americans who are openly cheering for a dictatorship, as long as it's their side doing it.

On the other hand, what exactly are the extreme positions of the left? I won't deny that there have been instances of anti-semitism on the left as well, but support for Palestine doesn't equal support for Hamas. Criticizing the government of Israel for enacting a genocide in broad daylight (as recognized by multiple human rights groups, including Israeli ones) does not equal championing the eradication of Israel or Jewish people.
Then there's obviously all the "culture war" issues. The left wants the LGBTQ community to have the same rights as everyone else, while anti-LGBTQ hate crimes are rising year over year. They want the trans community to have access to live-saving healthcare, as supported by the medical consensus worldwide. Biased source? Maybe, but a good list of statements by a variety of medical organizations on the matter. They want people of colour to be able to live their lives without fear of being harassed or even attacked or murdered. We're living in a time where even the existence of characters who aren't straight, white men in movies, tv shows and video games is decried as "woke", "pushing agendas" or "shoving them down our throats", while Trump and his goons are deporting US citizens and building concentration camps.

The most frustrating thing is that none of what is happening is in any way surprising. The left has been screaming and warning about all this for years. We had someone in this thread painting himself as an apolitical, regular guy with normal, regular problems. He was informed multiple times, in good faith, that the specific policy issues he raised were addressed much better by Harris's campaign than Trump's. He still ended up voting for Trump. He also went mask-off and shared straight up neo nazi rhetoric. It's this disingenuousness that gets me. On one hand playing the "I'm just a normal dude, I want to grill and drink beer", on the other hand revealing deeply political and far right talking points, probably from 4chan or another similar board that radicalizes people. In other words, there was no interest in discussing or learning. There was no interest in debating policies and positions. The lines were drawn, the colours chosen and there was no interest in actually talking about any of this.

This all might seem very one-sided and convenient to you. And honestly? It probably is. But I genuinely can't see how someone could think that what is happening on the far left is in any way comparable to what is happening on the far right, at the moment. Not saying that you are saying that by the way, I just took your comment as an excuse to put my thoughts in order and context.
 
Yeah, I can agree with that. It's why I like to differentiate between leftism and liberalism. In my experience leftists tend to criticize things like rainbow capitalism (corporate brands pandering to LGBTQ folks because, as it turns out, "the gays" also have money to burn!) while many liberals praise these companies and pretend that them using a rainbow coloured logo during Pride Month is worthwhile activism.

Having said that, given the current political climate and how Trump chooses to outright punish corporations that are "pro-DEI", "diverse", "woke" or whatever, I have to put my cynicism aside for a minute and applaud those, who still choose to support the LGBTQ crowd. Even if it's just performative, when these actions can result in monetary harm to a brand (which is what they care about the most, obviously), it is commendable that they are still going for diversity and representation. Credit where credit's due and all that. On the flip side there are brands like Disney, who somehow has this public image of being diverse and "woke", while actively cutting out LGBTQ themes out of recent productions. Elio was supposed to heavily involve queer themes, got entirely neutered and apparently turned into an unfocuse mess.

As for the general point about not taking accountability and instead doubling down, yeah, that's something I've struggled with before as well. Thankfully my mistakes in life so far haven't caused any harm or damage, but there have been plenty of personal interactions that I could and should've dealt with in a different way. It's something I'm working on. I'm trying to be better about saying "my bad" and acknowledging wrongdoing, rather than finding excuses and trying to lawyer-speak my way out of a situation on some technicality, to absolve me of my mistakes. I'm not sure if that's something that comes with certain political views or if that's more due to the internet, social media and having a couple of generations now that grew up in those environments.
 
Nobody is denying these people exist, but she is not the sole representative of a "far left".
And the fact is, millions have radicalized into far right. 30% of the voting eligible U.S. population are MAGA die-hards. They are transforming the country into a dictatorship and are in absolute power. How is that comparable to a nutcase at a conference in Iran?
 
While I don't agree with "Death to Israel, Death to America" historical context is important.
There are countless countries that have suffered due to American intervention, have had their (often democratically elected!) governments violently overthrown. The CIA has involved itself in many coups. There are nations and people who associate America purely with the pain and suffering that they endured due to the US. A bit like how the eastern European countries see Russia.

As for the "Death to Israel", yes, there is antisemitism on the left as well. No one can deny that. But you also can't ignore that there are, once again, entire generations that know the state of Israel purely as a military force that continues to destabilize the region. Look at the kids in Gaza who are intentionally starved, who are shot in the genitals by IDF snipers when they thought they were getting aid and food, who have their parents, siblings and friends blown up in front of their eyes. It is absolutely understandable that a person who went through such traumas can grow up resenting and hating the states responsible for the root of that pain.

That said, putting any trust into Twitter accounts without actually googling something yourself in 2025 is misguided at best. Scrolling through that account for a minute shows a very clear anti-Palestinian bias. That's all I'll say on this matter.

I stand by what I mentioned earlier: Right wing extremism is on the rise and responsible for the majority of terrorist activity. The US is descending into fascism. The rule of law and the Constitution are violated by the ruling administration. A couple of left-wing influencers or activists giving a speech with inflammatory phrases is in no way comparable to what is happening on the right.
 
Back
Top