Judas Priest


Already back in the studio!

Great news!
 

Richie with some tour discussion:

-> he said they'll revisit SWOD songs because of the anniv. Expected.
''I mean, they really started to solidify that sound on that record. And I think it's a really important one for the band, in terms of songwriting and sound, and for the fans as well. I think if you ask any fan, that's gonna be up there in their top five records, of PRIEST records.''

Andy wants to do ''Island Of Domination''. Richie said others like it, ''Reckless'' (try again), ''Pain And Pleasure'', ''Fever'' (he loves it)...many of them. Reckless and Fever would be great.

He also said that the chorus to a ballad on the upcoming EW album has been his idea for 15 years, and he even demoed it with Rob for the last album's sessions.
 
Last edited:
So Judas Priest will be playing at the Hammersmith Odeon in September.

1775508545087.jpeg

Do we know what is the setlist going to be like? It could be a good opportunity to finally see the band with Rob Halford!
 
So Judas Priest will be playing at the Hammersmith Odeon in September.

View attachment 45842

Do we know what is the setlist going to be like? It could be a good opportunity to finally see the band with Rob Halford!

Faithkeepers makes me believe it will be leaning into Defenders of the Faith album, on the other hand Richie said that they will honor SWOD for its 50th anniversary. If they release a new album by then, it might be focus on that too. So my answer is... I have absolutely no idea. :lol:
 
Faithkeepers makes me believe it will be leaning into Defenders of the Faith album, on the other hand Richie said that they will honor SWOD for its 50th anniversary. If they release a new album by then, it might be focus on that too. So my answer is... I have absolutely no idea. :lol:
So there will be the standard hits, a couple of deep cuts from Defenders and SWOD and a few others. Sounds like a great set.
 
Faithkeepers makes me believe it will be leaning into Defenders of the Faith album, on the other hand Richie said that they will honor SWOD for its 50th anniversary. If they release a new album by then, it might be focus on that too. So my answer is... I have absolutely no idea. :lol:
So there will be the standard hits, a couple of deep cuts from Defenders and SWOD and a few others. Sounds like a great set.

Thanks. I will probably wait until I know the setlist before purchasing a ticket, with the gig being on a Monday.
 
Thanks. I will probably wait until I know the setlist before purchasing a ticket, with the gig being on a Monday.
According to the new interview with Richie on Metal Pilgrim YouTube channel they won't release a new album until next year, so we can count that out. He also sad that there won't be any specific album focus for the tour this year, which I interpret as a "best of" show but we shall see.
 
A few SWoD tracks (VoC and The Ripper seem to be guaranteed), some Turbo songs, perhaps another deep cut or two (so far, Fever has been mentioned a few times) + the hits. That's all I'm expecting. Richie said that at this point nothing's 100% certain since they only have a general concept for the tour, they haven't decided what exactly should be played on Faithkeepers.

Could be a nice mix, despite attending quite a lot of Priest concerts, I haven't heard any Turbo song yet - besides Turbo Lover, of course. Genocide hasn't been performed in Europe since the early 80s, so it would be great to hear it this time.
 
I’ve rediscovered ’70s Priest. Sin After Sin and especially Stained Class have risen massively in my rankings. Now I clearly see the point of those who’ve long argued that ’70s Priest was the real deal.

In light of that, I even find myself rating Screaming for Vengeance and Defenders of the Faith a bit lower. Yes, those records are packed with undeniable hits, but at the same time it’s pretty clear they’re a continuation of Point of Entry (and probably even Killing Machine). Point of Entry album was shaped by label pressure, and while the band clearly tried to improve on it with subsequent releases, that commercial calculation still seems present in the background.

In the ’80s, Judas Priest lost some of their progressive edge - partly due to changes in songwriting and definitely in their drumming approach. I’m not saying ’80s Priest were weak at all (at least for the most part, ha ha), just that I see them in a different light now. They seem more influenced by what the label wanted than Iron Maiden were.
 
I’ve rediscovered ’70s Priest. Sin After Sin and especially Stained Class have risen massively in my rankings. Now I clearly see the point of those who’ve long argued that ’70s Priest was the real deal.

In light of that, I even find myself rating Screaming for Vengeance and Defenders of the Faith a bit lower. Yes, those records are packed with undeniable hits, but at the same time it’s pretty clear they’re a continuation of Point of Entry (and probably even Killing Machine). Point of Entry album was shaped by label pressure, and while the band clearly tried to improve on it with subsequent releases, that commercial calculation still seems present in the background.

In the ’80s, Judas Priest lost some of their progressive edge - partly due to changes in songwriting and definitely in their drumming approach. I’m not saying ’80s Priest were weak at all (at least for the most part, ha ha), just that I see them in a different light now. They seem more influenced by what the label wanted than Iron Maiden were.
Your avatar looks amazing.

Can you post the whole picture of this one here?

Thank you.
 
I’ve rediscovered ’70s Priest. Sin After Sin and especially Stained Class have risen massively in my rankings. Now I clearly see the point of those who’ve long argued that ’70s Priest was the real deal.

In light of that, I even find myself rating Screaming for Vengeance and Defenders of the Faith a bit lower. Yes, those records are packed with undeniable hits, but at the same time it’s pretty clear they’re a continuation of Point of Entry (and probably even Killing Machine). Point of Entry album was shaped by label pressure, and while the band clearly tried to improve on it with subsequent releases, that commercial calculation still seems present in the background.

In the ’80s, Judas Priest lost some of their progressive edge - partly due to changes in songwriting and definitely in their drumming approach. I’m not saying ’80s Priest were weak at all (at least for the most part, ha ha), just that I see them in a different light now. They seem more influenced by what the label wanted than Iron Maiden were.
The 70s era really grew on me after a few years of listening to Priest. It's true, it was different than what came later. I still consider DotF and Painkiller the band's greatest records, but the vibe of the early records is just unique. I have no doubt that - in the context of the music itself, not the image or anything else - the "S trilogy" is Priest's most important period. It's basically the foundation of almost everything that was happening in classic heavy metal in the 80s. Sin After Sin is my personal fav (the Here Come the Tears/Dissident Aggressor duo must have been shocking back in the day), but Stained Class is probably the most "complete" record from that era. It's the one I keep coming back to pretty often in the last several years, it's never boring to revisit the album. It's interesting how many thing from the 70s era were later borrowed by younger bands - Stained Class pretty much gave birth to Mercyful Fate. Melissa is more or less the continuation of the SWoD-SAS-SC run.

Priest started in the 70s and it was very commong for artists from their generation to struggle in the 80s. Many musicians who were already big in the 70s had problems with facing changing trends and expectations later in their career. Generally speaking, Priest are associated with the 80s (which isn't strange or wrong by any means, it was their commercial peak), but in fact they were already "old" when albums like Screaming for Vengeance or Turbo arrived, not to mention Painkiller. The 80s were also much less experimental decade in general. Of course, new genres appeared, but it was a simpler decade.

Even if you look at Killing Machine, it's an adventurous album. Some of the songs are pure heavy metal (Hell Bent for Leather), but at the same time there's Take On the World, which was supposed to be something like Queen's We Will Rock You, there's Before the Dawn, there's Burnin' Up (IMO one of their most unique tracks - it's basically a mix of disco and heavy metal). Later they stopped doing things like that. Tbh the only song that comes to my mind is The Rage, which mixes metal with reggae (I'm not counting United since it's a rather poor attempt to replicate the Take On the World formula). SfV, DotF or RiD are much more straightforward albums.

The variety of the songs is something I like about the early stuff, but it can be a problem too. For example, I've never really liked Epitaph. Again, it's clearly influenced by Queen's songs and it's not bad per se, but does it make sense to listen to it right after hearing The Ripper or Victim of Changes? I wouldn't say so. Last Rose of Summer is another example in this matter - it just makes no sense to me, in the context of the whole record. But then again, this isn't something they were thinking about in the 70s. They were experimenting and writing music for fun, trying to figure out what works and what doesn't. That's why Sabbath wrote Changes or Who are You? in the same decade. It was a different era, a different approach to making music, people who we call pioneers today didn't care about such things at all. They probably weren't even aware of the influence their work would have on other artists.
 
I've never really liked Epitaph. Again, it's clearly influenced by Queen's songs and it's not bad per se, but does it make sense to listen to it right after hearing The Ripper or Victim of Changes? I wouldn't say so.

On the original running order, it's before them tracks. Side one of the original album is Prelude, Tyrant, Genocide, Epitaph and Island of Domination. The more widespread running order makes no sense to me, Prelude is track 5 FFS :lol:
 
Back
Top