Totally agree — it's fascinating how the idea of the "author" has evolved into more of a brand in many cases. With names like Tom Clancy or James Patterson, it feels less like you're buying a book by a person and more like you're buying into a particular formula or universe that carries their name. It’s a whole publishing machine.Tom Clancy is like that too. Seems there is at least a new book every year even though he has been dead since 2013. Of course, he allegedly used ghostwriters when he was alive and his name is just a brand by now, but come on. Same for James Patterson (still alive though).
The Wheel of Time series by Robert Jordan was finished by Brandon Sanderson after Jordan's death etc.
There's been J.R.R. Tolkien books published fairly recently! (Dead since 1973.) And while I don't know what I believe, Christopher Tolkien could have made these up all by himself. Who the hell is going to know how finished these supposedly "found manuscripts" actually were?
And going further back, Dumas used ghostwriters extensively, and while extremely talented, he was also like a popular brand author at the time. The Count of Monte Cristo is believed to be written by Dumas himself, but the plot outline is by Auguste Maquet.
It's not a new thing. And it's not going to disappear anytime soon.
Read The Tusks of Exctinction (2024) by Ray Nayler.
Science fiction thriller about mammoths brought back from the dead - led by the human consciousness of a 100-year dead elephant expert transferred into a mammoth-brain... Decent read.
I find this idea disturbing to the extreme.Read The Tusks of Exctinction (2024) by Ray Nayler.
Science fiction thriller about mammoths brought back from the dead - led by the human consciousness of a 100-year dead elephant expert transferred into a mammoth-brain...
I mean, mammoths brought back is bad enough, but the elephant expert part gave me nightmares last night.I find this idea disturbing to the extreme.
In my teenage years, I was completely devoured by Stephen King’s books. That was truly something. But now, his newer works feel rather meh to me.
I had a similar experience reading The Hobbit. Totally fascinating, and my favourite book that was compulsory to read at school at that time.When I was a kid, I stumbled upon J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit, or There and Back Again in my school library. Reading it was nothing short of a revelation. The story felt so different, so magical—it was pure enjoyment, and I read it at just the right time (around 6–10 years old for the first time). Deep down, I think I actually rate The Hobbit higher than The Lord of the Rings, which I only read in my late twenties. The Lord of the Rings struck me as more "historical", weighty, even somber, whereas The Hobbit was pure fantasy in its essence. Although The Lord of the Rings movies are GREAT, The Hobbit films really aren’t all that great.
I also hold The Silmarillion in very high regard. It’s not entertainment in the usual sense, but the world-building is so rich and fascinating that it reads almost like a Bible.
In my teenage years, I was completely devoured by Stephen King’s books. That was truly something. But now, his newer works feel rather meh to me. I think I’ve outgrown him, while the master has more or less stayed in his lane.
I had a similar experience reading The Hobbit. Totally fascinating, and my favourite book that was compulsory to read at school at that time.
I’m approaching my late twenties now so it might be time to pick up The Lord of the Rings.