Yes I do.Do you really think they changed the drummer after so long for just 1 tour?
Playbackie Lawless....Playback? I saw blackie singing half of the song and playing less than half of the song. And Gnr i put a video and stop afyer 1min
But they (I think Bruce) said that for this tour they wanted to bring back songs they haven't played recently and that they probably wouldn't be played again in the future. The idea is clearly to keep playing. Simon has extended the band's life.Yes I do.
That’s why they chose the drummer they chose. They could have gone with the young buck Joe Lazarus or another more profile drummer.
No, instead they’ve chosen a guy nearly as old as them who’s been playing with Steve for more than a decade. This was the obvious choice when a band just needs a step in for one last big tour.
And I never said they’d stop playing.But they (I think Bruce) said that for this tour they wanted to bring back songs they haven't played recently and that they probably wouldn't be played again in the future. The idea is clearly to keep playing. Simon has extended the band's life.
The GMETID tour in 2003 had even less of a theme than this one, right? The anniversary is one of the stronger ones.Unless a new album comes out I really doubt they’ll keep touring. They’ve always said they don’t want to be a cabaret band just playing the hits and since the reunion they’ve been very careful to find good themes as an excuse to go out and do a nostalgia tour in between new album tours.
This run for your lives tour is the first time I feel like there’s no real theme for this tour other than to celebrate 50 years and that is a fitting way to end. I can’t see a brand new nostalgia hits themed tour after this one.
Playing one off gigs and the odd headline festival gig gives them an excuse to play whatever they want from any album without coming up with a new theme to base a whole tour on.
Unless a new album comes out I really doubt they’ll keep touring. They’ve always said they don’t want to be a cabaret band just playing the hits and since the reunion they’ve been very careful to find good themes as an excuse to go out and do a nostalgia tour in between new album tours.
This run for your lives tour is the first time I feel like there’s no real theme for this tour other than to celebrate 50 years and that is a fitting way to end. I can’t see a brand new nostalgia hits themed tour after this one.
Playing one off gigs and the odd headline festival gig gives them an excuse to play whatever they want from any album without coming up with a new theme to base a whole tour on.
That was just the good old rule "Don't look for a new band member that is trying to sound like a clone of the former band member“.…They could have gone with the young buck Joe Lazarus…
That’s why I loved the nostalgia tours because you always knew a new album and album tour would follow plus I got to see a ton of songs played live on the nostalgia tours that I either hadn’t heard in a very long time or never before.One could argue that several of the nostalgia tours, regardless of how they were marketed, placed them firmly in the cabaret territory. Nothing wrong with that, I thoroughly enjoyed them and the fact that they were alternating them with tours with a heavy focus on the new albums.
Quite genius in my opinion. But we didn’t need that third Maiden England leg.One could argue that several of the nostalgia tours, regardless of how they were marketed, placed them firmly in the cabaret territory. Nothing wrong with that, I thoroughly enjoyed them and the fact that they were alternating them with tours with a heavy focus on the new albums.
No ones realistically going to veto recording an album. It's not like they're banging one out every year. It's been 6 years since they've been in a studio together.As far as a new album is concerned, I have had my doubts about that for a few years now. But I really wonder how they decide when to make a new album. Is it all down to Steve (and Bruce?), or does every member have the possibility to veto a new album.
That’s why I loved the nostalgia tours because you always knew a new album and album tour would follow plus I got to see a ton of songs played live on the nostalgia tours that I either hadn’t heard in a very long time or never before.
To truly turn into a cabaret band, and Maiden could easily have done this, would have been to knock out a couple of albums when Bruce and Adrian rejoined then spend the last 20 years just playing hits like Kiss were doing for the last 20 plus years.
The GMETID tour in 2003 had even less of a theme than this one, right?
It wasn't until a year ago or so I understood that tour nameBlow jobs until you are dead is not a theme strong enough??
True, and I would have liked at least a couple more albums but at least when they did release an album during the reunion they went all in for each release.There’s levels of cabaretness and Maiden are definitely, and thankfully, not at the Kiss level yet. But let’s not kid ourselves: they have released just 6 studio albums in the 26 years since the reunion took place. That’s not a benchmark of productivity.
You compare them to say Saxon who have been far more productive on the album front in the same time period but each new tour your lucky to get 2/3 new album songs played and the rest is the same standard greatest hits.
That is something cool but as much as I love Saxon I’ve never understood why wheels of steel is so revered.That is true.
That being said, I am glad Saxon will be playing Wheels of Steel in its entirety at the gig I will be attending in November rather than newer stuff.![]()