It is, and always be Somewhere in Time, closely followed by Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. I don't get the love for Powerslave, I mean it's 4 mega hits and some fillers with enjoyable parts. Sure, the cover is iconic, and the whole Live After Death timeline may play a part in it, but I don't think that it's anywhere near their best records. I listen to Piece of Mind more than Powerslave. POM has only 1 truely weak song, PS has at least 3, but it may be 4. I love the solos in The Duellists, but the song itself, well...
Ha, on the contrary, I can't understand how
Somewhere in Time could be someone's favorite Iron Maiden album.
Sure, the cover art is fantastic, and so is the production. But beyond that? There's no way
Somewhere in Time has four songs as timeless as the ones on
Powerslave. No f**king way.
Not long ago I revisited
Somewhere in Time while driving to my dear grandma's village, so the whole atmosphere was summery and uplifting. One thing really stood out to me during that listen: this is the album where Steve, in my opinion, started to drift into repetitive songwriting and unnecessarily long song structures. Thanks to the superb production and the generally high energy of the album, it's not always obvious, but it's there. At times it becomes tedious.
My dislike of
Heaven Can Wait only grew stronger. So many intros, breakdowns, reprises, and repeated sections... it just starts to drag. I absolutely love the "oooh" singalong part because of the atmosphere it creates, but apart from that, the song does very little for me.
Lyrically, I also think
Somewhere in Time is a step down. Steve has never written only narrative lyrics, but here he seems to rely more on impressions than storytelling. And when there is a story, I don't find it nearly as engaging as on the earlier albums. To me, this is probably Maiden's nerdiest album.
It also feels like they stepped slightly off the heavy metal highway and onto a different road. I still consider it part of Maiden's golden era. It's fast, energetic, and often relentless - but it belongs to a slightly different universe.
As I've said before, I personally think it was too drastic a stylistic shift after
Powerslave, and not for the better.
Now, don't get me wrong - I like plenty of songs on it:
Caught Somewhere in Time,
Wasted Years, parts of
Sea of Madness,
The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner,
Stranger in a Strange Land,
Deja-Vu, and
Alexander the Great. So I'm certainly not a default hater of the album. I appreciate it on its own merits.
But as the follow-up to
Powerslave? It leaves me unsatisfied.
Powerslave, on the other hand, has four stone-cold classics. The remaining tracks may not be quite as iconic, but they perfectly complement the album's overall microcosm. What's not to love about
Losfer Words,
Flash of the Blade,
The Duellists, and
Back in the Village? The guitar work, the solos, the twin-lead harmonies - they're all over the album. On
Powerslave, the guitars and drums are king. The guitars sound properly metallic to me, and that's frigging important.
On
Somewhere in Time, by contrast, I perceive the guitars as slightly diluted.
If I had one criticism of
Powerslave, it would be that two songs revolve around essentially the same theme: sword fighting and duelling.
So that's my contrary opinion.
To me,
Powerslave was Maiden's absolute peak.
And I think the grueling
World Slavery Tour changed many things afterward.