USA Politics

She certainly can do it at her age. My questions are a) does she want to and b) her age might hurt her ... McCain had plenty of other problems, but he looked horrible standing next to Obama ... a younger candidate can appear more dynamic. Not the only factor for sure, but it is a factor.
 
McCain had plenty of other problems, but he looked horrible standing next to Obama
I hate to say this, but that's mostly because McCain can't move. It felt unfair, but his injuries have limited his mobility significantly. We'll see, anyway. I guess my thought is that if Hillary both a) wants to do it and b) is willing to accept she has to work for it (unlike last time), then she probably will win. If she doesn't do b, she could lose.
 
There are his injuries and that was not really fair at all. But I think most older white guys would not have looked good either.

Hillary does seem to have a sense of entitlement and I think that turns some off and she comes across as being awkward when she tries to be "common"
 
I don't know if they would have looked as bad as McCain. Reagan certainly had lots of energy to radiate at his age. But politics is generally a young person's game.

I think Hillary just needs to stop trying to pretend she is "just one of the girls". She isn't. She's special, and she should remind people why she is special. She doesn't have Bill's ability to chillax out with a worker then go in the next room and hobnob with PhDs.
 
I don't know if they would have looked as bad as McCain. Reagan certainly had lots of energy to radiate at his age. But politics is generally a young person's game.

I think Hillary just needs to stop trying to pretend she is "just one of the girls". She isn't. She's special, and she should remind people why she is special. She doesn't have Bill's ability to chillax out with a worker then go in the next room and hobnob with PhDs.


Exactly ... though people seem to want a President who can "feel their pain" .. I think it is crap, I want someone who is effective, not someone like my idiot neighbor. Gore really got hurt my not being able to do that as did Romney.
 
The Republican wave that swept over the states left Democrats at their weakest point in state legislatures since the 1920s.

Everything went in the direction of the GOP as Republicans seized new majorities in the West Virginia House, Nevada Assembly and Senate, New Hampshire House, Minnesota House and New York Senate, The West Virginia Senate is now tied.

Control of several legislative chambers was still up in the air early Wednesday as counting continued in several tight races that will determine control of the Colorado Senate, New Mexico House and Maine Senate.

The lone bright spot for Democrats was holding majorities in the Iowa Senate and Kentucky House.

The overall number of divided state governments will increase with changes in governor in places such as Massachussets, Illinois, Pennsylvania and Maryland along with the legislatures in West Virginia, Minnesota and New York.

UPDATE: Republicans have taken control of the Colorado senate and the New Mexico house. They also have a chance to win the Colorado house and the Washington house, after mail-in ballots are finally counted. The state legislative chambers now stand at 65 Republican, 23 Democrat, 1 tie, and 4 undecided.
 
It's really a shame Romney got used up for the last campaign. I'd rather see him be president than Hillary. How big is the chance he'll run again?
 
Slim, he's been pretty Shermanesque so far. There's talk of drafting him, but I can't see it.

I don't think Romney would be a bad president at all - certainly better than Bush, and he was, by far, the best of the likely Republican candidates of the last little while. If I didn't approve of his vice presidential selection (and I didn't) then at least it wasn't as blatantly offensive as Sarah Palin.
 
Nixon was nominated a second time. William Jennings Bryan was nominated three times and never won. But it is pretty rare in US politics.
 
Yes, those were different times. He is done ... if a Republican wins, he would be up for a Cabinet post if he wanted one.
 
I don't follow news and politics very much so I can't say for sure, but I'm a Republican so I'm just glad they're back in control again. And after reading about Obama sending a secret letter to of all places, Iran, and him still allowing flights from Africa with the ebola outbreak, we definitely need people like him out of office!
 
Well, I shouldn't say I'm a complete Republican. I am somewhere in the middle. I do fully support gay marriage for example. Again, I really should stay out of this thread since I don't know enough about politics to really give any decent opinions and I'm too lazy to do any good amount of research. But with approval ratings as low as he's gotten, there must some damn good reasons for it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_approval_rating
 
Not shocking at all
=================
An architect of the federal healthcare law said last year that a "lack of transparency" and the "stupidity of the American voter" helped Congress approve ObamaCare.
In a clip unearthed Sunday, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Professor Jonathan Gruber appears on a panel and discusses how the reform earned enough votes to pass.

He suggested that many lawmakers and voters didn't know what was in the law or how its financing worked, and that this helped it win approval.

"Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage,” Gruber said. "And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical for the thing to pass."

Gruber made the comment while discussing how the law was "written in a tortured way" to avoid a bad score from the Congressional Budget Office. He suggested that voters would have rejected ObamaCare if the penalties for going without health insurance were interpreted as taxes, either by budget analysts or the public.

"If CBO scored the [individual] mandate as taxes, the bill dies," Gruber said.

"If you had a law that made it explicit that healthy people are going to pay in and sick people are going to get subsidies, it would not have passed," he added.

The clip is generating significant attention in conservative media. Gruber declined to comment in an email.

The economist, who helped design a Massachusetts law that inspired ObamaCare, said he wished "we could make it all transparent, but I'd rather have this law than not."
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare...elped-law-pass
 
That's more of a reflection of American attitudes on taxation than it is on Obamacare itself, really. As he is saying at the end - he thinks Obamacare is better than nothing. Which is a good description for it. Better than nothing.
 
I guess if you cannot convince people, just lie to them ... and people wonder why Americans have such a low opinion of government.
 
Back
Top