22 The Avenue
Nomad
I thought my winky face helped to solidify the joking/sarcasm.Err... that's mimed. Bruce's voice coming out of Steve mouth is one of many giveaways.
I thought my winky face helped to solidify the joking/sarcasm.Err... that's mimed. Bruce's voice coming out of Steve mouth is one of many giveaways.
I think SIT is directly responsible for the band's 90s decline. The overcomplexity seemed to be in direct conflict to the direction Bruce wanted to go, and the reaction to this direction after Seventh Son led to the "simplification" around NPFTD and FOTD. Quite simply, SIT is when Maiden pushed it too far in one direction.
You gotta be kidding me. This song probably has the least variation of all Maiden/w Dickinson songs from the eighties. The progression is very predictable, monotone (constantly the same chords) and repetitive. The "ta da da" theme runs though the whole instrumental mid section. When I hear it, I wait til its over quickly. And that isn't a good sign when I'm listening to Maiden. Instrumental sections are usually for me highlights of the song. Not this time. The whole thing just "happens" and doesn't go through any interesting direction.Revelations, arguably the most complex song written at the time for the band.
As a counter point, Bruce has the sole writing credit on Revelations, arguably the most complex song written at the time for the band.
You gotta be kidding me. This song probably has the least variation of all Maiden/w Dickinson songs from the eighties. The progression is very predictable, monotone (constantly the same chords) and repetitive. The "ta da da" theme runs though the whole instrumental mid section. When I hear it, I wait til its over quickly. And that isn't a good sign when I'm listening to Maiden. Instrumental sections are usually for me highlights of the song. Not this time. The whole thing just "happens" and doesn't go through any interesting direction.
@Perun : I'd never considered that actually. I knew Bruce didn't receive writing credit on NOTB because of legal reasons. I don't know if I'd go as far to say Steve gave Bruce the sole credit to Revelations as some kind of compensation, but there is probably more that meets the eye in this case.
he did play guitars on it when they played it live
I think it may be something like Nicko and New Frontier: Bruce hummed or sang some riffs, and Steve found the notes for it and fleshed it out. Even without guitar skills, Bruce could still have generated all the main ideas, but he couldn't finish it alone I bet.
I have to agree with Foro. How is Revelations musically complicated? Lyrically, maybe it's above the Maiden norm.; musically, hardly. It's total bog standard rock fair.As a counter point, Bruce has the sole writing credit on Revelations, arguably the most complex song written at the time for the band.
Are you confusing the "complicated" mix (more than one studio, synths, etc) with the songwriting?I think SIT is directly responsible for the band's 90s decline. The overcomplexity seemed to be in direct conflict to the direction Bruce wanted to go, and the reaction to this direction after Seventh Son led to the "simplification" around NPFTD and FOTD.
Since everything after is being judged as inferior, was this not a good direction?Quite simply, SIT is when Maiden pushed it too far in one direction.
Perhaps why you're blaming it for all Maiden's 90's woes? Adrian (disinterested), then Bruce (disinterested), then Blaze (not a patch on Bruce) would be more likely suggestions for Maiden's "decline".Also, I don't like it that much.
I think, on SIT, both the mix, including the addition of synths, and the songwriting are complex. SIT has some of the more complex songs from a songwriting perspective, and some of the harder to play ones (such as the sublime Sea of Madness). So no, I am not confusing the two aspects of complexity, I am suggesting they both apply.Are you confusing the "complicated" mix (more than one studio, synths, etc) with the songwriting?
Actually, I think Seventh Son is a superior album to SIT - where there was the most synthesis between Bruce and Steve and H as the primary songwriters. I also think everything post-reunion is better than both albums, so I'd say they got there eventually. I'm not saying SIT is bad, but I just don't think it is nearly as good as people here seem to believe.Since everything after is being judged as inferior, was this not a good direction?
Why were Adrian and Bruce disinterested? Because it wasn't what they wanted to do. Both men's post-Maiden solo offerings can give us a fantastic insight to the music they wanted to make instead of the albums they had to make as part of Maiden. Quite simply, SIT started the process of pushing Bruce out of the band - but it also led to Steve wanting to go back to basics, which is what pushed H out.Perhaps why you're blaming it for all Maiden's 90's woes? Adrian (disinterested), then Bruce (disinterested), then Blaze (not a patch on Bruce) would be more likely suggestions for Maiden's "decline".
Actually, I think Seventh Son is a superior album to SIT - where there was the most synthesis between Bruce and Steve and H as the primary songwriters. I also think everything post-reunion is better than both albums, so I'd say they got there eventually. I'm not saying SIT is bad, but I just don't think it is nearly as good as people here seem to believe.
.
Hmm, maybe. I just don't think SiT is that complicated an album, from a songwriting perspective.I think, on SIT, both the mix, including the addition of synths, and the songwriting are complex. SIT has some of the more complex songs from a songwriting perspective, and some of the harder to play ones (such as the sublime Sea of Madness). So no, I am not confusing the two aspects of complexity, I am suggesting they both apply.
I prefer the mix/production of SiT over Seventh Son, personally. I can't agree with some of the post-reunion albums being better than SiT I'm afraid. Only AMoLaD comes close in my opinion.Actually, I think Seventh Son is a superior album to SIT - where there was the most synthesis between Bruce and Steve and H as the primary songwriters. I also think everything post-reunion is better than both albums, so I'd say they got there eventually. I'm not saying SIT is bad, but I just don't think it is nearly as good as people here seem to believe.
Personally, I think H's output was pretty poor. Bruce's latter output in awesome tho'. But a huge share of that must come down to Roy Z, surely?Why were Adrian and Bruce disinterested? Because it wasn't what they wanted to do. Both men's post-Maiden solo offerings can give us a fantastic insight to the music they wanted to make instead of the albums they had to make as part of Maiden. Quite simply, SIT started the process of pushing Bruce out of the band - but it also led to Steve wanting to go back to basics, which is what pushed H out.
I don't really blame him either. I just said he ain't no Bruce; from a songwriting &/or singing perspective. It just kind of showed how really important Bruce was to the band. Or, at least, that's the view I take.I cannot blame Blaze for anything. I maintain what I have said previously - without Blaze Bayley, Iron Maiden died in 1993 and remained dead.