GhostofCain
Ancient Mariner
I see two outstanding albums, personally.
With another couple of albums worth of fillers!
I see two outstanding albums, personally.
I agreeI see two outstanding albums, personally.
FixedTheres filler on both imo. Especially onSenjutsuThe Book Of Souls
There´s no filler in SIT and SSOASS to me.…But there's also 'fillers' in all of their albums
Lol defo filler on Senjutsu. Im not a big fanFixed![]()
I mean 'fillers' : the songs the band never play Live on the proper tour because maybe they think these songs are less stronger than the other ones.There´s no filler in SIT and SSOASS to me.
I mean 'fillers' : the songs the band never play Live on the proper tour because maybe they think these songs are less stronger than the other ones.
And “The Parchment” is total filler, apparently.That's an interesting take on the term. So, by that, Iron Maiden and AMOLAD are the only albums not to contain any fillers?
Yes it isAnd “The Parchment” is total filler, apparently.
And “The Parchment” is total filler, apparently.
Deep down in my heart I know that there's some truth to his words
There's a certain feel in common, but had the lyrics been different, you wouldn't write this. Those songs are not that close.
I think ''fillers'' (and some albums don't have imo) are always the short/er songs and it doesn't matter if they're played live or not. I mean, more thought goes into the longer songs. The singles are also not fillers. An album like FOTD has fillers, Steve implied that, if only because Maiden don't usually put 12 songs on their albums. In an album of 8 songs is difficult to point out songs as fillers, regardless if they're strong or ''weak'', athough Invaders/Gangland for example feels as such (Sun And Steel too). Also, a song with acoustic parts (or different parts) and a lot of tempo changes can't be a filler for me. I think maybe Losfer Words can be viewed as a filler, to give an example. The writing quality is so good (especially since 2000) that I don't think Maiden writes fillers. When you usually write albums with 10 songs on them, I don't think you're writing fillers, you're just trying to write 10 strong songs.I mean 'fillers' : the songs the band never play Live on the proper tour because maybe they think these songs are less stronger than the other ones.
The Book Of Souls has an ancient feel to it, but I don't think it's that close to Powerslave. Celts and Clansman are a better example, and yet they have different feels imo.Come on, the acoustic bass intro from Celts is total Clansman stuff and then it just goes from there. It’s like when you paste something into Chatbot and tell it to rewrite it.
Bruce’s melody is totally aping the driving rhythm of The Clansman vocal as well. I can’t fathom how some of you guys don’t hear it.
The lyrics could be about cheese on toast and I’d still pick up on the similarities of the music. Same as how Book of Souls aped parts of Powerslave. Which maybe you didn’t notice either![]()
Why Maiden should write songs like in the 80's? They moved on. The current style is their/Steve's favorite style. The short rockers are for Adrian, Bruce and Janick. I think instead of 2 short songs per album, they should put 3/4 and we have a great balance. Besides, Maiden have never been a band that fills their albums with short songs (excluding some albums, ofc). They are more talented than that. The catchiness is always there.But he is also right about many bands. Maiden