Rush Discography Discussion 2: Caress of Steel (1975)

Cygnus Book I is not Peart's best work (that may have come on Hemispheres), though it does represent a branching out. Call it a significant moment in the development of Rush as a band and Peart as a drummer -- but it's still kind of a "miss."

Like I wrote before, I give them credit for ambition, and there is no shame in aiming high and falling a bit short, which I think Rush did on Book I. For example, I understand why they wrote the "messy black hole" bit the way that they did, but that still doesn't mean it's great. The rest of A Farewell to Kings is a much more musical album, while Hemispheres gets more experimental. Cygnus Book I represents the transition between those two albums, which is admittedly interesting, but ultimately flawed.
 
A Farewell To Kings (the song) makes exactly the right statement as an opener.
Very progressive with good melody, lyric and just enough power — I love the mid-section.
The 12-string intro with the layered orchestration immediately announces this is not going to be 2113 — this is a band reaching for new ground. The sound is impeccable, as nearly always the case with Rush, but the percussion, synthesizers and different guitars are richer and more lush and signified what was to come.

I'm going to read the lack of commentary on Xanadu as a statement of the obvious: it's brilliance is self-evident.
So I am going to follow the trend.
But I would be really interested in hearing what Harrisdevot, or someone else just discovering the band thinks.

Overall, the album is so good, so varied, so rich and so challenging and so cohesive that has to be considered among their very best. I prefer other Rush albums, but Kings is certainly the apex of their prog work.
 
Yea would love to see some Rush newbies' take on Xanadu, or any of this album, for that matter.

The title song is almost underrated it seems. When it comes to that album everyone talks about Xanadu. It's probably in the most unfortunate position possible; before that monster track. Still up there with Rush's best openers. Such a triumphant chorus.
 
Just to further the commentary on the lyrical theme(s). Each individual song can be taken on multiple levels, but the album's central theme is embodied in it's title: A Farewell to Kings is about the perils of self-interest and of a society allowing itself to be controlled by self-interest.
 
Mckindog, may I ask how is that the central theme? I understand it's the theme of the title track (a.o. songs) but -as argued- two third of the album is not about that (or is it)?
There are more themes. I'd say roughly two:
Madrigal, Xanadu and Cygnus have to do with some kind of quest or search for a certain paradise or mystery of some kind. These songs are the main bulk (two third!) of the album, so it can even be seen as the main theme.

The other 3 songs are about the effects of human nature in a society.
 
The protagonist in Xanadu is on a quest of personal self-interest: immortality. It ends badly.
Cygnus parallels Xanadu. The protagonist is also on a quest of personal self-interest: knowledge of the black hole. Again, it ends badly.
In setting himself up as king, Xanadu's explorer and the Rocinante's captain have destroyed themselves (and, it can be implied, those depending on them.)
Madrigal is the counterpoint — the benefits of unselfish love.
 
Knowledge of a black hole self interest? Nah (like this every action in every lyric is self interest). Science is in the benefit of mankind. :) Besides, that story didn't end either. It's just part 1.

In search for a mystery of some kind or a certain paradise suits me better.
 
Interesting commentary by mckindog, though I must say I disagree. I am skeptical that the same person who penned the lyrics to an Ayn Rand-inspired ode to individual artistic self-interest would turn around a year later and write an album about the perils of pursuing one's self-interest or exploring new horizons. I just don't buy that. Indeed, the title track seems to be a continuation of the Ayn Rand philosophy, calling for an end to the tyranny of the governing class who, like the railroad tycoons and government bureaucrats in Atlas Shrugged, beat down the multitude and scoff at the wise. So, I think mckindog's reading of the title track might be the polar opposite of what Mr. Peart intended. Plus, unlike the explorer in "Xanadu" (who, in the tradition of Ayn Rand's villains, didn't create anything new himself but instead tried to free ride on Kublai Khan's grand accomplishment), things actually don't end too badly for the captain of the Rocinante: on Hemispheres, he visits Mount Olympus where he becomes a god who saves mankind. So he's got that going for him, which is nice.

Foro's interpretation that the theme involves exploring mysteries may be a bit closer, but again it only applies to a couple of the songs.
 
We know now that Peart eventually grew out of his "Randroid" phase, however we don't know when. It would definitely seem odd for him to suddenly write about the perils of self interest a year after 2112. However, he did write about the need for balance between logic and artistic sensitivity not too long after. I don't think it would be too unreasonable for him to observe the pros and cons of self interest over the span of two albums. Just a thought, and hopefully it makes sense since I feel like I'm about to fall asleep as I type this.
 
Before I get started, feel free to continue talking about AFTK (or any other album for that matter) even though the week is up. Just thought I'd point that out since this was the first time we had a discussion last the full week.

Hemispheres (1978)
Rush_Hemispheres.jpg

From the opening fade in chord it is immediately apparent that this is a special album. Rush's last all out progressive rock effort contains only four songs, but what a strong collection of songs! Easily the most complex Rush album, containing their last side long epic and their longest instrumental track to date. This is the peak of Rush's progressive rock era. Complicated rhythms, odd time signatures, and thought provoking lyrics are abundant here.

For Rush's last 70's effort, they decided to go all out with longer structured pieces. Geddy Lee noted 3 years later that "Hemispheres was the straw that broke the camels back in terms of long songs" and the entire band has commented on the difficulty of recording this behemoth of a record. La Villa Strangiato alone took longer to record than the whole of Fly By Night. Even the shorter songs, have several different parts and unique structures. The technical difficulty of these songs is also much higher than the rest of Rush's catalog up to this point, and probably even still to this day.

Despite a mostly positive reception and high regard among fans (with two classic songs), Hemispheres was one of Rush's weaker albums in regards to sales. Peaking at #47 in the Billboard charts, this would be the last time a Rush album failed to reach the top ten until Hold Your Fire, 9 years later.

Hemispheres is the closing of a high regarded chapter in Rush's history, before heading into an increasingly more commercial sound. However, with the highly ambitious songwriting, it's no wonder why they decided to take another direction afterwards. With Hemispheres, they took that progressive rock sound as far as it could go. And while they haven't made another purely prog album since, that sound would remain an influence in Rush's sound for another few albums, and still recurs even today with the most recent release, Clockwork Angels.
 
Can I drop this here? Forgive me my ignorance but I was not aware of this:

Do you guys own this on DVD? Was it part of a certain re-release of the album(s) involved?
 
Knowledge of a black hole self interest? Nah (like this every action in every lyric is self interest). Science is in the benefit of mankind. :) Besides, that story didn't end either. It's just part 1.

In search for a mystery of some kind or a certain paradise suits me better.

Not arguing with yours or Cornfed's posts — different interpretations is one of the great things about lyrics — but I do want to make sure I'm clear about the nuance of mine: Peart is very much about individual self-improvement and self-determination; I wasn't trying to suggest he made a sharp left turn (pun intended).

But I do think Farewell is where he started to explore the difference between self-determination and selfishness, and make a statement about responsibility.
 
But Maiden's classic albums "episode" got released on DVD.
Yea, they all get DVD releases, this one included. I don't own it but it's on Netflix (along with the other episodes) so I'm not in a rush (ha) to buy it. Not part of any re-release but 2112 and Moving Pictures both got recent remasters with 5.1 mixes and such. Haven't got the MP yet but the new 2112 rocks.
 
Yea it's a great series. Definitely got some of my info on the Ayn Rand stuff from that doc. I knew about the influence but I didn't know that they got a lot of heat for it. I was a bit disappointed that they crammed two albums into one episode (they did the same with a couple Frank Zappa records too), would've rather them just focus on Moving Pictures. But it's still pretty informative and it's the first time I've seen Rush discuss songs from the b-side of 2112 in depth like that, which was pretty cool.
 
Only seen the first 34 minutes as we speak. I love the part about The Twilight Zone which is one of my favourite series. Seeing this connects me even more to this track. Nice that they were into it so much.
 
But I would be really interested in hearing what Harrisdevot, or someone else just discovering the band thinks.

Thanks for asking. The reason for my late answer is related to Rush : I've bought Snakes and Arrows three weeks ago... and I'm like unable to listen to anything else since :blink: . But I won't anticipate.
Farewell to Kings is exactly what I was expecting from Rush when I started to buy their records : ambitious, varied, great music and vocal melodies. To me, Xanadu is the highlight of the album, and the best song they had ever recorded at the time : a complex song, with a lot of variation (the most dynamic passages are great) and the vocal melodies are fantastic. It is a long song, but this length sounds necessary to develop all the potential of the song. Cygnus though, which I began to listen to as a suite, still doesn't really make it to me. But I shall try again and again. I am actually bored by some passages. I understand that, when played live, it helps to create a certain atmosphere, but, alone in your living room, it is sometimes difficult to get into (to make my point clear, I often have this problem with the central part of The Rime of the Ancient Mariner). All in all, though, this album is clearly a big step forward. While I thought 2112 was a bit overated, Farewell to Kings really deserves its reputation.
 
Re Hemispheres:

This album continues the maturation of the band which began on Kings. Their songwriting just keeps improving and becoming more consistent. This is not as cohesive an album overall as A Farewell To Kings, and thus is not quite as great, in my view. The great moments on Kings are generally greater than the great moments on Hemispheres (though "Villa" rivals "Xanadu"), while Hemispheres is more consistently enjoyable throughout.

As I wrote earlier, "Cygnus X-1 Book II" is far more interesting than "Book I." That's my subjective opinion, but I think objectively "Book II" has much more of a focus on music, and less on atmospheric sound effects. The plot: after going through the black hole, the captain of the Rocinante (named after Don Quixote's horse, btw) finds himself on Mount Olympus, where Apollo and Dionysus are battling for the souls of man. Apollo believes mankind should be guided solely by logic and reason, and Dionysus believes it should be guided by desire and emotion. The captain convinces them that both are important elements of being human (left-brain vs. right-brain, hence, the two "hemispheres" of the brain). This is such a persuasive and surprising revelation to the gods that they make the captain a god as well. Rather than a soundtrack-type extended score, as others observed "Book I" was, it really should be considered a suite of about five or six shorter, related songs. (0:00) "Prelude" dispenses with the atmospheric sound effects after about three seconds and jumps right into the song, which is reminiscent of the 2112 "Overture" as it anticipates many of the musical themes throughout the longer suite, but then it transitions to its own stand-alone song. And, at around 1:58, it also foreshadows the harmonic beginning to "Red Barchetta." Nice melody, occasionally a "groovy" kind of rhythm, very guitar-heavy. If "Prelude" were simply a stand-alone song, it would not have been out of place on Permanent Waves. Solid classic Rush sound, and highly enjoyable, but not nearly as memorable as the overture to 2112. (4:30) "Apollo" slows things down a notch to start, some awkwardly sung lyrics, but then kicks into a heavier guitar-focused theme. Someone once wrote that music isn't just about the notes, it's about the spaces between the notes. Rush really figures this out here, as the most exciting parts of the song are the pauses before the descending chord progression. (7:00) "Dionysus" is very similar musically to "Apollo." Lyrically, it's the "right-brained" rebuttal to Apollo's "left-brained" argument that mankind should be guided by logic and reason rather than emotion and desire. (9:06) "Armageddon" is, understandably, the heaviest part of the song, though it features some fairly annoying vocals by Geddy. (12:00) This is the part where the captain tries to break up the war and argue for the compromise, and becomes a god named Cygnus. The song slows WAY down at the beginning, and starts to sound like Book I. Not coincidentally, I start to lose interest here. The vocal melody isn't bad, though. Things pick up again at about 14:35, and ultimately reaches the climax, and arguably the best part, of the entire suite. Very 2112-sounding. Awesome Lifeson solo here. (17:02) "The Sphere" is the quiet conclusion, in which the left brain and right brain become united in a sphere. Lovely song, and appropriately short.

Obviously, given the title of the album, "Book II" was intended to be the centerpiece of the album. But, side two is actually better -- a LOT better. "Circumstances" is a great hard rock track. Great, unconventional riffs, some changes in time signature. A lot going on in the span of a fairly short, under 4-minute song. I've read a fair amount of criticism of Geddy's high-pitched singing on this track, but I don't mind it. I like this song a lot. In fact, it has become one of my favorite Rush tracks. "The Trees" is an ingenious allegory (or, is it a parable?) criticizing the evils of ... what? I've read that it is anti-tyranny, anti-communism and anti-racism. It's probably all of those, and probably also shows that Ayn Rand was still a significant influence on Peart at that time. The song is a fan favorite and frequent concert staple.

"La Villa Strangiato" is, in my view, the apex of Rush's prog-rock achievement. Brutally hard to play, evidently it took them as long to record this one song as it took them to record entire albums in the past. Yet it is so damn brilliant that they have been compelled to play it live, which must have given them night terrors early on. This is the song that makes you realize that each member of the band is a world-class musician, as the playing is so technically precise. And, while this song is (as they subtitled it) "an exercise in self-indulgence," it is very musical and pleasing to the ear. They make the difficult seem effortless. People worship Peart, and as mind-blowing as his (and Lee's) playing on this track is, Alex Lifeson nearly steals the show here -- how this track did not elevate him to the status of "guitar god" alongside Clapton, etc., is beyond me. A true masterpiece. One of the greatest Rush tracks ever, and arguably the greatest rock instrumental ever.
 
Back
Top