national acrobat
Ancient Mariner
Hmm he's a decent player, but I think Henry/Bojan or Deco/Iniesta or even Giovanni dos Santos would have more of a positive effect were they in need of a boost late on.
Rijkaard's been linked a lot with Chelsea, and a lot of Chelsea fans I (unfortunately) know would like him as their manager, although I think anyone would do after Avram.Forostar said:It might be now or never for Rijkaard! I wonder if he can stay if Barca will be out.
Exactly the same again today. One lucky goal the difference - 1 second of a misplaced pass from Xavi in an otherwise perfect passing game, and a shot from Scholes that could have gone anywhere.Forostar said:Last match Barcelona had 61% ball possession, Man U 39%.
Barcelona had 42 min and 39 seconds ball possession and Man U 26 min and 10 seconds.
26 minutes in a whole game!
Barcelona had 8 shots at the goal and Man U only 1!
It's obvious who's the stronger team. I think Man U really was lucky that they didn't have goals against them.
We'll see how things are gonna turn out tonight! Have a great match everyone!
Hmm I agree with that except the last statement; I hate Man U but give me them over Chelsea any day.Natalie said:That was one of the most painful matches I've ever watched, I think I'll die a few years early from heart failure because of that one. Paul Scholles shot the only goal in the match 1-0 for Manure, abysmal forward play by Barca in the second half, however I'd say that the better team was Barca especially in the first half, terribly unlucky they were that that one bad pass turned into a goal...so in conclusion whoever wins tomorrow's match, I'm rooting for in the finals.
OK OK it was a good goal, I'm just annoyed at the result.Eddies Wingman said:Well, well. Lucky goal? Remember who scored the goal. Mr. Scholes has scored a few of these before ... Of course, a terrible pass from the Barca defense.
Agreed - I would even go as far as to say that if Messi was not their last night, Barca would have been just a bit more ordinary. And Ronaldo's performance also strengthens the argument that he is just not a "big game" player (I don't whole heartedly agree, but he is sometimes not quite up to the grade on the bigger stage).national acrobat said:On another subject, of who's the best player in the world at the moment, based on the two last matches I have to say Messi is a much better player than Ronaldo. Eash shine in their domestic games, but when it came to the big matches, Messi was the focus of all Barca's attacks, and Ronaldo was largely anonymous in both matches.
Ronaldo has just been nominated the PFA footballer of the year. The PFA player of the year is voted for by the players and if he is not that great, that suggests that either the Premiership is low on talent or the players themselves don't know what they are talking about. He may well have a real attitude, but he is a good player and has steadily become better over the time. In short, I don't agree with you about him not being that great.Natalie said:@Eddies Wingman: It also adds to the grim satisfaction whenever they lose. Then again, any team with C. Ronaldo in it I'd root against (having said that, I really hope Barca never make a bid for him). He's not that great and he has a real attitude problem.
If West Ham get beat this weekend, that smile will last for some time yet. The Premiership will be won and the confidence will carry on until Moscow. Forget the current wobble, it's only temporary.Eddies Wingman said:@Back in the Village : Doesn't all this "oh, how I hate ManUre, hope they get stuffed" and "Ronaldo is a cnut" just add to the pleasure when the Red Devils win?