Watched Fury (2014) tonight. Not near a perfect film, but in the end a very moving and gripping one. I felt it tilted towards the too depressing in the first half (without a clear moral focal point to relate to), but quickly became better as it turned into a more direct survival story in the latter half or so.
I disagree. The strength of the film was the portrayal of the American soldiers in the first half not as larger-than-life, self-sacrificing liberating heroes as had still been done in the Spielberg productions, but as regular people in war, driven to moral ambiguity by the circumstances they were thrown in and couldn't fully grasp. When it became a survival story of five guys against a Waffen-SS battalion, it threw that overboard and completely fell apart, becoming worse than
Private Ryan in every respect. If the film starts out critical of war and the ones thrown into it, this criticism becomes unbelievable - and worse, hypocritical - if it evolves into an adventure film with larger-than-life heroes.
Moreover, there were two personal gripes I had. First, there was the oversimplification of the Germans in the film. It was well-intended, saying the bad guys were the Nazis (here, the SS) and not the Germans in total. But things weren't remotely that simple. I know that in a case of historical drama, things need to be simplified for narrative purposes, but I still think it could have been handled better than that. If Tom Cruise - incidentally one of my least favourite actors - could pull it off beliavably in
Valkyrie, I can't see why
Fury couldn't. All it would have taken was an old woman in the town who is portrayed as a convinced Nazi, or a brief partisan ambush somewhere by people who
didn't wear SS uniforms.
My second problem may seem as nitpicking, but it really fucking annoyed me: In the 2010s, it should pose no problem to find a few native German extras to portray Germans in a Hollywood film. You only need four or five people to shout out the handful of lines you have for them. But no. With the single exception of the SS commander in the end, every German soldier in the film spoke German with an atrocious American accent. It was obvious that they had no clue how to properly intonate German, and that they didn't know what they were saying. There is no reason for that. There are enough young German men who would be happy to be on the screen with Brad Pitt. My guess is that all the extras were American re-enactors. That's fine, but if you're going to have people actually
say things in the film, why can't those four or five people be native speakers? It's sloppy, lazy and took me out of the film completely. It gets even worse when you consider that they actually
did cast noted German actresses for other scenes, so it couldn't have been that much more of cost and effort.
In conclusion, I don't think it was a terrible film, but it fell significantly short of its ambitions and does not add anything new to the topic of the Second World War in the cinema.