NOW WATCHING

this weekend I watched Rocky Balboa, The Holiday and The Nativity Story. All three movies were great. The rocky movie was unexpectedly amazing. In short What is a man to do when stripped of his identity? The Holiday was a thoughtful romantic comedy about moving on and of course taking chances. The Nativity Story was really good. Focusing on Mary, Joseph and Herod more than on Jesus. The Three Wise Men make an appearance too.
 
I watched, just before the Christmas weekend, Bruce Almighty and reminded myself why I do not find Jim Carrey funny. Whilst it was an OK(ish) movie with an interesting premise for a story, I found once again Carrey's humour to be too forced - he tries way too hard. I had a discussion with a work colleague about this and another name popped up - Bill Murray. The reason for this is that we both find Murray funny - but because he adopts this "less is more" attitude to his comedy, he becomes funnier.
 
The day before yesterday I watched Home Alone for the 100th time.  It never gets boring.  You're all probably familiar with it,  by now.  What you may not know is that the director also made the first 2 Harry Potter films.  You could see the these films all had the same feeling and the music in Home Alone reminded me too much of Harry Potter.  All this basically is trivia I suppose no one cares about,  but I suppose reading the film's plot once again would be even more boring :P.

The moment when the kid puts the gangster film on and scares the hell out of the pizza guy is just priceless  :D
 
Home Alone is a great holiday movie, it never gets old.

Anyway, I saw Blade Runner recently and thought of 2 things while watching it:

a) This music is very Pink Floydian
b) 2001 Space Odyssey

I think my connection with Space Odyssey comes from the pace...a bit slow, with some nice overview shots. To me it seems odd to think that Ridley Scott directed both this and Gladiator, two very different films, both very good in their own right.

Another film I saw was Pirates of the Carribean 2, an utterly useless movie that felt like a waste of my time. Jack Sparrow was still mildly humorous, but bordering by now on the ridiculous.
 
What did you think of the first film Nat?

I recently watched Charlie And The Chocolate Factory (the remake).  I remember reading reviews about this film,  and how good it was,  but I just couldn't get interested in watching it.  I found the story to be too childish,  in a "yepieeee" kind of way if you know what I mean ;).  The pictures just made it look so "stupid" I couldn't believe people found it so good.  So,  anyway, my mother happened to buy it,  and I watched (even though with some reluctance).  Well there's one thing I can tell you.  It was a GREAT film.  I loved it.  The story was in fact really good,  and it just gripped my heart from the first scene (the way Charlie's house was portrayed was excellent).  It seems that once again Tim Burton made a great film.  I recommend this film to anyone.
 
I thought the first film was hilarious, I remember laughing throughout the entire movie. Maybe I didn't find this one as funny because I'm a bit more mature (or I hope so) but I think it's because its getting old. Although I'll definitely go see the third one because I want to know how it all ends (kind of like with the Harry Potter books, I no longer enjoy them, but I'll get the seventh one just to know what happens).  :blush:
 
Natalie said:
I thought the first film was hilarious, I remember laughing throughout the entire movie. Maybe I didn't find this one as funny because I'm a bit more mature (or I hope so) but I think it's because its getting old. Although I'll definitely go see the third one because I want to know how it all ends (kind of like with the Harry Potter books, I no longer enjoy them, but I'll get the seventh one just to know what happens).  :blush:

I know the feeling... <_<
 
Today, I viewed Razorback, one of the best Australian horror/action movies ever made. The direction is dazzling, the cinematography is truly remarkable and the cast is brimming with quality actors. Mysteriously, no one seems to care. There is no denying that Razorback's basic plot premise is pretty ridiculous. In short, a giant boar (a Razorback) goes on a killing spree in a small outback town. This is about as unlikely as a giant shark terrorising swimmers (Jaws) or a wet Japanese woman climbing out of a television set (Ring). My point is that even the most ludicrous storyline can be overcome by excellent film-making and this is certainly the case with Razorback. The film is directed by Russell Mulcahy, and it was made a year before he would have his big hit with Highlander. His direction is solid enough, and it's notable for the way that he captures the locations within the Australian outback. Some of the shots are truly breathtaking, especially the atmosphere ones that are filled with smoke (well, he does go a tad overboard with the smoke machine). The razorback does look somewhat unconvincing when on-screen, making the best attack scenes the ones where it's not on-screen at all. An ideal way to spend 90 minutes on a late night. Maybe it's not very profound but one should be wise enough to realise that not everything has to be profound (I know, I just feel the need to defend B-movies from snooty art film fans, that's all).
 
So I finally saw The Prestige with Christian Bale, Hugh Jackman, Scarlett Johanssen and Michael Caine at the "dollar" theaters.

sidenote: when I moved to Tucson 7 years ago The dollar theater was in fact ONE dollar. Now the admission was $3.50... they should change their name.

Back to the movie: It was amazing, it really keeps you guessing all throughout, and it is interesting all the way through too. Several times I felt it could fall back and be boring, but it never did. The rivalry between the two magician's (Bale and Jackman) and the obsession they take it too is all too familiar. I took it as a warning, not to hold grudges, know how to forgive, and don't let anything consume you to the point where it drives your life.
 
I saw 'Requiem For a Dream' (2000).  I disliked it.  The movie has no redeemable qualities as far as story-telling and emotional appeal are concerned.

It is a story about four people and their drug addictions.  The director fails to impress upon the viewer a reason to care for the characters.  Only the negative is shown without even the slightest hint of a light at the end of a tunnel.  Why would a non-addict, such as myself, care to see the completely drab, meaningless, perverse (and in one instance, insane) existence of these characters.  The movie seems to revel in taking us blindly through the muck and slime, without ever trying to communicate any sort of social support or pity for these wretched lives. 

On the plus side, the actress that played the insane woman, pulled off an amazingly scary performance.
 
Genghis Khan said:
The director fails to impress upon the viewer a reason to care for the characters.
This is possibly why I really rated Trainspotting - you cared for the characters. Whether that was been repulsed by some or sorry for others, you were never neutral.
 
Albie said:
This is possibly why I really rated Trainspotting - you cared for the characters. Whether that was been repulsed by some or sorry for others, you were never neutral.

The fact that Renton's the narrator means that you can really get an insight into his reasoning and day-to-day life.  Rather than having to discover all characterisation through inferration and dialogue between the characters, the film is able to start in media res and let Renton tell you everything you need to know, as you need to.  This also allows the film to stay relatively light-hearted while showing some of the bleakest circumstances, as Renton is able to deliver one-liners to add a splash of black humour to the scene.  A brilliant movie, by all accounts.
 
@ Albie & Raven: I have read comparisons between the two movies ('Requiem...' and 'Trainspotting').  It sounds like the latter is better.  The former only shows that drugs are bad for you, nothing more.  No duh!  I already know that.  I'll have to see 'Trainspotting' now.  I think I'm one of the last persons on Earth who has not seen it.
 
Ok So I saw The Boondock Saints and it was a very well done movie, I don't know if I could watch it more that 3 times and still be amazed or take it seriously, because even after just watching it once all the flash is gone... not to mention who wants to see Willem Dafoe in drag even once? lol

I also saw Almost Famous which is a rather "old" movie, but I enjoyed it a lot. It's about a kid who is mature for his age (he was in 7th grade at age 11) and loves rock 'n' roll thanks to his sister passing on her LP collection to him after she takes off with her boyfriend. He ends up writing for music magazines and gets a shot to write for Rolling Stone and ends up following a fictitious band "Stillwater" on tour. Your usual coming of age story, but a good movie nevertheless.

And finally I saw Pedro Almodovar's "Volver" with Penelope Cruz. REALLY good movie. I didn't know what to expect given most of his previous movies are rather crude and deal with unpleasant topics which he presents in a very... raw form. So I was bracing myself and it turned out to be a very tastefully done light drama (you laugh your ass off every other scene... well I did). However it doesn't have a real ending.

If follows Raimunda, Penelope's character, her sister Soledad (or Sole) and her daughter Paola. The story centers around the fact that for 3 years they have visited their senile aunt in a small town not far from Madrid, Spain. They don't understand how she can keep such a neat house considering her condition and the town's people say it is their mother's ghost that has come back to take care of her. Their mother died in a fire, but they don't believe the town's folk. I can't say anymore because there are so many twists in the story anything more would just ruin it, but it was a very good movie.
 
I saw 'The Queen' over the weekend. After all the rave reviews and the Oscar nomination(s) I was expecting more from this movie. I expected it to be more about the Queen rather than about dealing with Princess Diana's death. I cannot sympathize with the British people on this one. I am too young to know the details, but after seeing the movie I feel disgusted at the mass hysteria about a woman that none of them knew. Yes, they knew her, the way the media painted her, her public face. They didn't know her personally and there they are all sitting and crying. I understood the Queen's point of view much better, so I got impatient with the whole ado about 'whether to fly the flag at half-mast over Buckingham Palace or not'. I wouldn't recommend spending money on this. Buy yourself a couple of beers instead, its a better investment.
 
last film I saw...hm, The TTerminal, that's right. Film is okay, but I expected more form film with Tom Hanks in it. But it has a few really cool moments, I agree.
 
Perun said:
Old? The film was released in 2000!  :huh:

Not exactly recent is it? you do realize that's 7 years ago.... any "new" picture is at least a year to a year and a half.. maybe two. 3-5 recent anything past 6 is old in my book.
 
I watched Pan's Labyrinth on Tuesday.  It was a great movie; both historical and fantastical.  It was childlike without being childlish. 

The movie is about a young girl who enters a land of magic and mystery, with the backdrop of Franco's fascist Spain during WWII.

The original Spanish dialogue (with English subtitles) adds to the movie.  I highly recommend it. 
 
Back
Top