I just found three pictures of a tour I'd done early this year online on a page from my university. My first thought was, "hey cool!", then I read the page and saw that my name wasn't mentioned anywhere. Indeed, the tour wasn't even acknowledged anywhere, only a brief sentence that the group they were talking about had visited the museum the day before. Instead, the research group of the university (which I'm not associated with), took all the credit for the exhibition, which was actually pretty shitty. I tried my best to make do with the mess they did and still provide valuable and accurate content. Turns out I did it for nothing. And this made me think... I worked in the museum for six years, and guided a pretty big number of small and major exhibitions. Three of them got large media attention as they were considered topical and prolific. There is no documentation that I guided those, and no public evidence of my work there. In fact, the entire evidence of my work for the museum amounts to a total of eight photographs online, unspecific credits in two publications, and a five minutes in a radio show that will be offline in half a year.
I can provide evidence for my work in a few contracts, and I'm sure the museum can confirm on request, but still, given the amount of time and effort I put into it, I don't only feel underappreciated, but actually a bit screwed. With a pay this shitty, you'd think that you would at least get some immaterial acknowledgement, some sort of badge that helps you with your career, but no. And they wonder why people turn their back on cultural institutions and become sales reps instead...