Done.Back on topic...
I still think Presence is my favorite album. Should we reopen poll? Very few people voted, evidently.
Done.Back on topic...
I still think Presence is my favorite album. Should we reopen poll? Very few people voted, evidently.
This was also the case for Golden Earring. Maybe not for all their songs, but definitely, their live material could differ a lot from studio work. And in some cases they had longer versions. Eight Miles High was 45 minutes (featuring this kind of antics)! Still, their studio records did not have such an unheard quantity of stuff taken from others. Maybe there was more imagination and time for studio work, who knows.Led Zeppelin, in their early days, were not a studio band. They were a live band. What they played live differed significantly, and even dramatically from what they put out on their albums. Dazed and Confused, six and a half minutes long on record, was extended to a musical extravaganza that would be between 10 and 30 minutes long at their gigs. Same with Whole Lotta Love. Moby Dick during their live gigs was essentially a 20-minute drum solo. They weren't songs anymore, they were sonic experiences. And what's more important, no two performances were the same. Sometimes they would just play whatever they felt like. And this is why Led Zep became so famous - they were bloody good at it. They would turn a gig into a jam session and remain so tight and focused that audiences were captivated by it.
We don't know that. When Golden Earring was starting out, a lot of the music they listened to was live, but the history of Dutch rock is not known to me, so what they could have been influenced by, how do we know?Still, their studio records did not have such an unheard quantity of stuff taken from others.
Thanks for trying to explain the different sides of what happened to Zeppelin Per.
This was also the case for Golden Earring. Maybe not for all their songs, but definitely, their live material could differ a lot from studio work. And in some cases they had longer versions. Eight Miles High was 45 minutes (featuring this kind of antics)! Still, their studio records did not have such an unheard quantity of stuff taken from others. Maybe there was more imagination and time for studio work, who knows.
I did.I made a long post, and most of what I wrote wasn't even commented on.
I wasn't kidding. You could have encapsulated most of what your first three paragraphs said with this one word.Can you guys not just use the word improvisation?
So here's the thing. I've never fallen in love with Zep. I've enjoyed some of their tracks, but never gone, OMFG MUST LISTEN. So I have all the albums, obviously, it's like required. But where should I start?and take the opportunity to discuss the mighty Zep again!
Listen to Zeppelin II and then Houses of the Holy. II gives you the best taste of their blues oriented music (also one of Bruce Dickinson's all time favorite albums I believe) and Houses of the Holy shows what they can do beyond that.So here's the thing. I've never fallen in love with Zep. I've enjoyed some of their tracks, but never gone, OMFG MUST LISTEN. So I have all the albums, obviously, it's like required. But where should I start?
Yea, and that's pretty much all it comes down to. Jazz/blues is driven by improvisation. It'll start with a familiar melody and then go off into a jam. I saw a Jazz concert a few weeks ago that opened with Synchronicity by the Police, I didn't even realize what it was until the leader said so afterwards. It was awesome.I wasn't kidding. You could have encpatulated most of what your first three paragraphs said with this one word.
But where should I start?
Houses of the Holy shows what they can do beyond that.
That's why I think overrated is not an over used word when it comes to Let Borrowing.Voted for Physical Graffiti, definitely my favourite. If I were to make my "best of" not a lot of songs would make the list from that album, but hearing it whole it just has some sort of coherence, I rarely skip a song.
On Zeppelin borrowing: I was very disapointed that a lot of their ideas were "borrowed". When I started listening them after Maiden (some 12-13 ago) I was amazed by quality of each and every album (until In Throught the Out Door / Coda). The melody and composion were amazing and I remeber every time I heard something that I haven't heard from them I thought: "Wow, they really were the game changer, and Page was really a genius). Then I started to noticing "borrowing". Now... There is a thin line between "inspired by", "borrowed" and "stole" but in this case thing that bugs me is that they became famous by those "questionable" songs.
You guys mentioned Maiden's borrowing - the lyrics are from Beckett in HBTN and the melody is in The Nomad. Lyrics stealing isn't a big deal for me as idea/melody stealing so I don't look down on HBTN because of that. The thing with The Nomad - they did that 20+ years into their carrer and it isn't even one of the best songs on the album, even for the fans at this forum. But on Zeppelin's case it seems like the whole songs were plagirized (melody, lyrics, composion) and that were the hit singles at the begining in their career. And that kind of watered down my respect for them. Mick Wall's biography didn't help either.