GhostofCain
Ancient Mariner
I've met loads of people whose knowledge of metal begins and ends with "the black album" and while that makes me sad inside a little, it is what it is.
You know?
I've met loads of people whose knowledge of metal begins and ends with "the black album" and while that makes me sad inside a little, it is what it is.
Talking about "hard rock" in general (more than about "metal"), your point would function well with the examples of Van Halen or Kiss, who are huge -but really HUGE- in the US only, and only "very popular" elsewhere.
Having said that, as Number 6 said, it doesn't change anything to our appreciation of these bands and of how "deserved" each band's success is, in terms of numbers.
That is precisely what I had in mind.You remind me of Stannis
Yes, but they were the biggest selling act in 1973 (right when Gillan left and Coverdale joined). However, the setlist to the DVD Perihellion (2002 I think) clearly underlines that they became a nostalgia act long ago in the US. Their popularity faded in the late 80s there.Take a look at Deep Purple(very influential band on Maiden). Their historic success in USA compared to the rest of the world is quite similar to Iron Maiden's success. Deep Purple had a mass popularity in Europe(they are one of the biggest classic rock bands in Europe), but they were far from that popularity in America. Deep Purple has sold over 100 million records worldwide, but in the US they've sold under 10 million records.
Were Hermética bigger than Rata Blanca?
Rata Blanca rock!
Inside Argentina yes, they are more popular than Rata Blanca although it's difficult to know exactly because the band doesn't exist anymore and it is more than 20 years now.
But yes, inside Argentina Hermética is the most popular local metal band.
But Rata Blanca are bigger in Latin America as as a whole.
Exactly.Ghost is well known, but do they even count as metal?
Slipknot is heavier than much of what Korn has released. I'd argue that Korn is one of the least metal bands in the nu metal genre.In the case of Korn (who basicaly invented the whole genre) perhaps it's true. Slipknot... mmmmm... not so sure.
Whether x is heavier than y that's not what point. As you mentioned and correctly Korn is nu metal. And we're discussing what's the "biggest" metal band in the world. So, since they sold more records than Slipknot and are way more popular (not to mention that without Korn there wouldn't be any Slipknot... Korn invented the whole downtuned, dissonant, mourning/screaming vocals with a spurt of rap here and there that zillions of bands started to adopt in thesecond half of the 90's). I don't even like both bands the slightest but I think it's plain to see. But hey... have it your way.Slipknot is heavier than much of what Korn has released. I'd argue that Korn is one of the least metal bands in the nu metal genre.
Both are metal bands for sure. And yes... Slipknot is way heavier.I thought you were saying that Korn and Slipknot shouldn't be considered "metal" given the post you were quoting.
Both are metal bands for sure. And yes... Slipknot is way heavier.
Slipknot is heavier than much of what Korn has released. I'd argue that Korn is one of the least metal bands in the nu metal genre.
Speaking of Slipknot, does anyone know what 742617000027 actually mean?
slipknot.fandom.com said:742617000027 is also the barcode number on Mate.Feed.Kill.Repeat . The intro title on the Self Titled album is a reference to this.