European Politics

Perun said:
Alright. I logged on here today after weeks of absence to see if there's any clean-up work I need to do. And then I find that speculation about my leaving has been used as an argument. I don't know who @Krampus is or what he believes to know about me to make a statement about me. So let me set this straight:

I removed my persona from this board after over 20 years of posting because I have been finding it increasingly difficult to tolerate certain other members and their behaviour. Since this is a "me" problem and these people remain blissfully unaware of the hurtful nature of their conduct towards me even after I point it out directly, I came to the conclusion that I am no longer wanted around here. This is a good fit, because I no longer want to be around here.

There is nothing else to it.
Click to expand...
My only comment about you was the intended compliment that you are very adroit at respectful debate.

I’ve no idea who you are or what issues you’ve been having but wish you well, sincerely. You present yourself as an intelligent and rational person. The people who post here are worse off for your absence.

That said, Brigs, a mod (and a good one who seems like maybe the only reasonable one in the virtual room sometimes) literally talked about the possibility of shutting down the politics threads. I wasn’t misattributing that comment to you.
 
Vaenyr said:
Let's get something straight, because I'm tired of the hypocrisy.

When Krampus/Sheriff of Huddersfield originally posted, I pushed back against some of his claims and wanted him to post some kind of source to support some of the more outlandish or inflammatory claims. He didn't like that and got increasingly more erratic, to the point of constantly trying to provoke me, even in other threads (like the "New users, who are you?" thread or whatever the hell it's called). Since then he kept trying to provoke me, which makes the accusation of me wanting the attention quite funny. This eventually led to Sheriff/Krampus rage-quitting the forum. In other words, a member who kept attacking and provoking me left the forum due to my behavior. Let's remember this.

At the same time we had members like Magnus and Judas complain about the mods banning people. Magnus in particular made it a point to keep calling me out and claiming that conservative users who'd be acting like me would've been banned, without ever explaining how he came to this conclusion. It's incredibly puzzling, considering the mods have repeatedly explained that they have not done that and aren't doing that. Yet despite that, this blatant lie was pushed constantly and he kept ignoring whenever I asked for any kind of evidence. So much so that Perun decided to quit the politics threads. So, ironically enough, despite the claims of folks like Krampus, it wasn't me who ran off a moderator; it was Judas. Not only that, we have Sheriff returning to this thread after having admitted that he went too far before and that he wanted to let things rest, to what, rile me up? Get me banned?

I've said it before and I'll say it again: If you think my posts aren't in line with forum rules, report them. It's that simple. If the mods find something questionable they can remove it. They can give me a warning. Hell, if they decide to ban me, then so be it. If that's not enough: Use the ignore function, that's what it's for. There is no pride in never using it. I don't get why so many have to make a show of "ooooh, Vaenyr's such a troll, he's the only one I ever put on ignore". Congrats, I guess? Should I be flattered? Thank my friends and family without whom I wouldn't be here? I thought I was the one who is supposedly "virtue signaling", yet we have multiple members here doing exactly that.

Enough jokes. Not everyone can get along with everyone. That's not realistic. I have a few people on ignore. I know other members ignore folks other than me as well. It's not a contest. Yes, I'm not the most pleasant person to interact with. I never claimed otherwise. But to try to pin all hostility on me, while ignoring who keeps engaging with me and in what way, is simply disingenuous.

With this I have said all I had to say on the matter. Go ahead and report whatever you wanna report and let's be done with it. This constant circling back and accusations of trolling (especially by someone who came back to attack me, while I'm contributing to a variety of threads on the forum) are getting quite boring. Virtual XI's still a masterpiece.
Click to expand...
Tl;dr.
 
Magnus said:
Blasphemy!
Cried was/is intelligent, fun and pleasure to communicate with, and never, ever, annoying in a way even remotely similar to what we've got here.
Trickster vs Puritan crusader, in a way.
Apart from that, thank you for your posts.
Click to expand...
Cried seemed to have a special affinity for Buckethead, Dave Murray, and snark. Perhaps I was too harsh in my judgement. Cried was mostly harmless.
 
MrKnickerbocker said:
And therein, maybe, lies the problem?
Click to expand...

No, were this a 1:1 beef old-school Brooklyn style with diss tracks and cliques, Hennessy and hootchies, perhaps.

However, in my absence, the dysfunction and tomfoolery manifests itself just the same. With certain characters at its cynosure.

You lot are mildly Shakespearian, like heavy metal Hamlet.

This is why Maiden fans can’t have nice things like political forums.

Oh wait, European politics — what’s everyone’s take on Luxembourg's tax bracket individualization?
 
I mean, Roth projects a €900M-€1Bn reduction in Luxembourg’s government revenues but, I suppose through income index forecasting and perhaps Net Present Value calculations, maintains that shortfall to number only €300M-€500M.

I don’t know, were I a Luxembourgian in Tax Class 2, I’d be a little perturbed as my spouse and I would be taxed individually rather than jointly under this plan.

Why even get married, no?

Anyway some may speculate this tax reconfiguration as the work of the invisible hand of the Kachkéis lobby.

I reject such calumny! They’ve no material stake in this that I can fathom. Cui prodest? At this stage, I’m unsure.

In any case, history may judge Roth as either the herald of Christian-Democratic Social Market Economics or a wayward buffoon.

I’m sorry to bring such an emotional topic to this forum but I can not maintain my silence in the face of such fiscal upheaval. I stand with Luxembourg Tax Class 2. A ~2.2 point projected GDP growth bedamned!!!!
 
The exact reason mods have thought about closing politics threads is because of the repeat pattern of a descent from reasoned debate into needling other members and eventually personal attacks.

The moderators also can and will take action against individuals who break forum rules and spoil the enjoyment of the forum for others. Its strongly advised that everyone reads the rules post and stays aware of this when posting.
 
Brigantium said:
The exact reason mods have thought about closing politics threads is because of the repeat pattern of a descent from reasoned debate into needling other members and eventually personal attacks.

The moderators also can and will take action against individuals who break forum rules and spoil the enjoyment of the forum for others. Its strongly advised that everyone reads the rules post and stays aware of this when posting.
Click to expand...
Thanks for keeping it grounded, Brigs.

I know, it’s tough to remain civil, particularly while the MEP debate surrounding gas storage regulations rages in the EU, polarizes opinions, tests friendships, and possibly causes divorces as arguments get heated.

Some of a more regulatory slant probably embrace the mandatory gas storage fill rate reduction from 90% to 83%.

Charismatic, controversial, and media savvy politicians like MEP Jens Geier seem in favor. He even wants to increase penalties for noncompliance. But is this just more of Geier’s showmanship and a cry for media attention? Possibly pandering to the Gen Z vote?

Sure, a lowered fill rate limit eases market pressure but what about supply gaps come winter? Perhaps market flexibility is the way.

As with all topics here, I know politics stirs emotions and may cause enmity. Please, please, please, let’s not have this topic devolve to ad hominem attacks, profile blocking, and dramatic forum exits.

Let’s discuss it like adults.
 
Last edited:
I'm not aware of any forum-splitting controversy around gas storage limits.

I am conscious of repeat episodes of polarised arguments, playing devil's advocate, and personal attacks, and would strongly advise ALL posting in politics threads - as everywhere - to read and give ongoing consideration to the forum rules.
 
Brigantium said:
I'm not aware of any forum-splitting controversy around gas storage limits.

I am conscious of repeat episodes of polarised arguments, playing devil's advocate, and personal attacks, and would strongly advise ALL posting in politics threads - as everywhere - to read and give ongoing consideration to the forum rules.
Click to expand...
Thanks, Brigs.

I was just thanking you for your comment and introducing the gas fill regulation as an on-topic discussion for the European politics thread.

Between that and the Luxembourg tax individualization debate, I can imagine this crowd having a few feisty takes that I hope can remain civil.

Is it as polarizing as the DEFRA funding moratorium on the SFI scheme in the UK thread? Probably not. Hoping we don’t see that one spiral, either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top