I prefer 100% freedom to 100% safety.
Correct me if I am wrong but I have seen disgust for expressions during a Pegida demonstration.
I meant specifically that someone may be unaware that someone insults other religions too; they see their religion/beliefs insulted/ridiculed, & that's all that matters to them. I just think that's a bit of a blind-alley side-discussion, & isn't that relevant.What does it matter? That depends on (what happened with) the individual. What matters to an individual can be influenced by a combination of indoctrination and what else happened in their (social) life experience. It can also be influenced by hatespeech.
In the US they just find other reasons to jail them, let's be honest.In Europe several imams have been thrown out of the country because they incite hate. In the US they say whatever they want, and individuals can belief they'd do the right thing if they'd bomb the Twin Towers.
Yip, have to agree. After the terrorists attacks at Glasgow airport, nothing really changed in Scotland. I think people just accept that 100% safety isn't possible. And, furthermore, people are sceptical that sacrifising more freedom(s) is actually likely to deliver greater safety anyway. I'm not sure what the majority would think if the choice was a real one though i.e. you can have 99-100% safety; here is what it will cost you in personal freedom(s).I prefer 100% freedom to 100% safety.
Democracy means living with the fact that there are people who have contrary opinions and opinions that you think are dreadfully wrong. The democratic way of putting up with that is voicing your opinion on their opinions.
How do you try to protect people from terrorism in a democracy?
I already wondered why Bearfan was silent on this. Free speech eh?In the US they just find other reasons to jail them, let's be honest.
But doesn't that border on speech?By removing its breeding grounds.
I already wondered why Bearfan was silent on this. Free speech eh?
Yeh, in particular I was referring to Abu Hamza al-Masri:I already wondered why Bearfan was silent on this. Free speech eh?
But doesn't that border on speech?
Yeh, in particular I was referring to Abu Hamza al-Masri:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-30754959
This guy preached hate on the streets in the UK for over a decade & we didn't stop him doing this. I haven't look in detail at the evidence the US brought against him though.
At least they don't get the death penalty.He just said it 2 minutes ago ... pick a case and we can discuss it. I do not know of any specifically, though I would not be shocked if it happened post 9/11 and it would be wrong if it did. Which would show how dangerous what you support is. As evidenced by 50+ people being arrested in France that had nothing to do with the attacks.
I believe several other imams were kicked out.Yeh, in particular I was referring to Abu Hamza al-Masri:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-30754959
This guy preached hate on the streets in the UK for over a decade & we didn't stop him doing this. I haven't look in detail at the evidence the US brought against him though.
Can't disagree with all of this. But I believe there is more. It is also fundamentalism within religion. Indoctrination.Terrorist breeding grounds within Europe are unemployment, poverty, active racism (e.g. not employing Arabs), insecurity (crime, social insecurity) and the likes. If you fight those, you fight terrorism.