PlayClassics!
Educated Fool
Also, Paid Reviews also played it's part, like that joke of a Review in the Tour Program.
AMOLAD is just incredible. The riffs, melodies, solos, and especially lyrics are all easily among Maiden's best. The songs fit together perfectly on a thematic and musical level. The arrangements are also quite complex for Maiden, with many instances of beautifully layered guitars. Listening with headphones is necessary to truly comprehend this album. The production perfectly suits these tracks too, giving a raw, dark atmosphere. Bruce is at his best as well, giving a spirited and emotional performance. Finally, the album ends with FTGGOG, Lord of Light, and The Legacy, the best 1-2-3 punch in the IM catalog in my opinion.
Like being the antithesis of one of the most legendary metal albums of all time would be a good thing?
I agree with everything here except AMOLAD songs not working on their own. I think that holds true for some songs, but I also think at least half of the songs rank among some of the best they've ever done.AMOLAD is the anti-TNotB.
AMOLAD's strength is its consistency. Songs that would be regarded as weak on other albums (Pilgrim, OOTS) work here. They fit in the flow right. But if you take these songs individually, out of AMOLAD context, most of them aren't quite as good. FTGGOG works in the album but seems repetitive alone.
Compare to TNotB, which is stocked full of classic songs (Hallowed, title track, Children, 22) and yet doesn't give the same "complete organic album" feel.
AMOLAD is the anti-TNotB.
Compare to TNotB, which is stocked full of classic songs (Hallowed, title track, Children, 22) and yet doesn't give the same "complete organic album" feel.
OK, so...Like being the antithesis of one of the most legendary metal albums of all time would be a good thing? AMOLAD isn't worthy even of cleaning The Mighty Beast's cloven hooves with it's tounge!
To me AMOLAD is exceptionally weak and boring, but I do have a theory of why it's popular: THE HYPE! The band really Went out of their way to praise this album, even playing all of it live. And of course, fanboys jumped on it and said it was the best album they'd ever done. Because if they play all of it live, it must be, riiiiight? Then it just snowballed from there. Average Joe listens to the album and Thinks : "Uhhm, not too good". T hen Average Joe goes on the web and sees all the praise for the album and average Joe Thinks "Uuhm...maybe I missed something here?" And so he listens again, but he still doesn't Think it's very good. However, since Average Joe wants to be like everyone else, he Thinks the fault is with him, not with the album. So he listens again and again, and somewhere along the way Average Joe starts to Think he loves the album too, and goes back on the web and writes his own HEARTFELT opinion about how this album is a masterpiece, a modern Classic, better than 80's Maiden, etc etc... and then ANOTHER Average Joe reads the Review of the first Average Joe, and the process repeats...
try and show a bit of respect for others opinions in the future
Yet in this very same thread, you say the album is "solid":To me AMOLAD is exceptionally weak and boring.
Which is it?It is extremely overated IMO. Solid, but nowhere near their best works.
OK, so...Like being the antithesis of one of the most legendary metal albums of all time would be a good thing? AMOLAD isn't worthy even of cleaning The Mighty Beast's cloven hooves with it's tounge!
To me AMOLAD is exceptionally weak and boring, but I do have a theory of why it's popular: THE HYPE! The band really Went out of their way to praise this album, even playing all of it live. And of course, fanboys jumped on it and said it was the best album they'd ever done. Because if they play all of it live, it must be, riiiiight? Then it just snowballed from there. Average Joe listens to the album and Thinks : "Uhhm, not too good". T hen Average Joe goes on the web and sees all the praise for the album and average Joe Thinks "Uuhm...maybe I missed something here?" And so he listens again, but he still doesn't Think it's very good. However, since Average Joe wants to be like everyone else, he Thinks the fault is with him, not with the album. So he listens again and again, and somewhere along the way Average Joe starts to Think he loves the album too, and goes back on the web and writes his own HEARTFELT opinion about how this album is a masterpiece, a modern Classic, better than 80's Maiden, etc etc... and then ANOTHER Average Joe reads the Review of the first Average Joe, and the process repeats...
OK, so...Like being the antithesis of one of the most legendary metal albums of all time would be a good thing? AMOLAD isn't worthy even of cleaning The Mighty Beast's cloven hooves with it's tounge!
To me AMOLAD is exceptionally weak and boring, but I do have a theory of why it's popular: THE HYPE! The band really Went out of their way to praise this album, even playing all of it live. And of course, fanboys jumped on it and said it was the best album they'd ever done. Because if they play all of it live, it must be, riiiiight? Then it just snowballed from there. Average Joe listens to the album and Thinks : "Uhhm, not too good". T hen Average Joe goes on the web and sees all the praise for the album and average Joe Thinks "Uuhm...maybe I missed something here?" And so he listens again, but he still doesn't Think it's very good. However, since Average Joe wants to be like everyone else, he Thinks the fault is with him, not with the album. So he listens again and again, and somewhere along the way Average Joe starts to Think he loves the album too, and goes back on the web and writes his own HEARTFELT opinion about how this album is a masterpiece, a modern Classic, better than 80's Maiden, etc etc... and then ANOTHER Average Joe reads the Review of the first Average Joe, and the process repeats...