Judas Priest

Eh, a DotF & SfV tour is - at this point - a rather impossible scenario, in my opinion. At the moment they're recording vocals for the 20th album, it seems that the whole thing is going to be finished surprisingly soon. They won't be on tour post-September (that's when Richie wants to play with Elegant Weapons), in 2027 (and perhaps in 2028 too) they will be focusing on promoting the record. How much time do they have left? How many tours? Faithkeepers isn't going to be too DotF/SfV-heavy, it's gonna be more like a mix of everything, with an emphasis on Turbo and Sad Wings.

The idea itself sounds great and I'll be happy to see a setlist like that. But on the other hand - they've already revisited many DotF and SfV songs, only few are left untouched. Honestly, I could be intrested in Priest coming back to the 70s songs that haven't been performed too often. There are tracks such as Stained Class, Raw Deal, White Heat Red Hot that I'd love to hear. Don't get me wrong, I don't have anything against the two iconic LPs from the 80s, but most people who attended the recent tours have already heard stuff like The Sentinel, Devil's Child, Love Bites or Freewheel Burning (this one is a live staple, considering how often they perform it).
 
Last edited:
Eh, a DotF & SfV tour is - at this point - a rather impossible scenario, in my opinion. At the moment they're recording vocals for the 20th album, it seems that the whole thing is going to be finished surprisingly soon. They won't be on tour post-September (that's when Richie wants to play with Elegant Weapons), in 2027 (and perhaps in 2028 too) they will be focusing on promoting the record. How much time do they have left? How many tours?
Good call.
The idea itself sounds great and I'll be happy to see a setlist like that. But on the other hand - they've already revisited many DotF and SfV songs, only few are left untouched. Honestly, I could be intrested in Priest coming back to the 70s songs that haven't been performed too often. There are tracks such as Stained Class, Raw Deal, White Heat Red Hot that I'd love to hear. Don't get me wrong, I don't have anything against the two iconic LPs from the 80s, but most people who attended the recent tours have already heard stuff like The Sentinel, Devil's Child, Love Bites or Freewheel Burning (this one is a live staple, considering how often they perform it).
If Priest had done a History tour, around the 70s albums would have been an option. We also missed out on a full-on Nostradamus tour. Turbo + RID would have been a nice tour to represent the 80s. Rock Hard Ride Free and Fever are the popular deep cuts left to return, otherwise a great combo of albums (like AOR and SWOD because of the covers, Firepower and IS...).
 
Last edited:
I've been listening to Invincible Shield album a lot the last few days, idk why I didn't get around to it earlier cause I did like the songs I heard on the radio. I think it's a great album. Favorite songs are probably As God Is My Witness and Fight Of Your Life.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Yax
Creative juices are pouring down like torrential rain. Maiden, whatever you do - definitely don’t take any notes from Priest…
(quietly deploys reverse psychology and waits)


In a new interview with Spain's Metal Journal, JUDAS PRIEST bassist Ian Hill confirmed that he and his bandmates have commenced work on the follow-up to 2024's "Invincible Shield" album. He said (as transcribed by BLABBERMOUTH.NET): "We've done most of the music, or all the backing tracks anyway; we've got them down. There might be one extra [song] to do. But the vast majority of it, the backing tracks have been done. The guys have been to Phoenix working on vocals with Rob [Halford, PRIEST singer] over the last few weeks, I believe. So he's in the process of putting the vocals down."

As for the musical direction of the new PRIEST material, Hill said: "The style, it's a little bit different from the last one. It's — I don't know — a little bit more traditional, maybe a little bit quirky with some of the things. And, yeah, it should be good. Like I say, I've only heard it in very raw form — just basically guitar, bass and drums. That's all I've heard so far. But, yeah, it's shaping up to be a great classic PRIEST album. It'll be out some time next year. It'll be out probably March, April, something like that, I should imagine. That's down to the record company."

Asked if he means that the new PRIEST album will be "traditional" in the vein of classic PRIEST LPs "British Steel", "Screaming For Vengeance" and "Defenders Of The Faith", Hill clarified: "No, not that traditional. [Laughs] It's more along the lines of 'Invincible Shield', but a lot more direct, shall I say."
 

In a new interview with Spain's Metal Journal, JUDAS PRIEST bassist Ian Hill confirmed that he and his bandmates have commenced work on the follow-up to 2024's "Invincible Shield" album. He said (as transcribed by BLABBERMOUTH.NET): "We've done most of the music, or all the backing tracks anyway; we've got them down. There might be one extra [song] to do. But the vast majority of it, the backing tracks have been done. The guys have been to Phoenix working on vocals with Rob [Halford, PRIEST singer] over the last few weeks, I believe. So he's in the process of putting the vocals down."

As for the musical direction of the new PRIEST material, Hill said: "The style, it's a little bit different from the last one. It's — I don't know — a little bit more traditional, maybe a little bit quirky with some of the things. And, yeah, it should be good. Like I say, I've only heard it in very raw form — just basically guitar, bass and drums. That's all I've heard so far. But, yeah, it's shaping up to be a great classic PRIEST album. It'll be out some time next year. It'll be out probably March, April, something like that, I should imagine. That's down to the record company."

Asked if he means that the new PRIEST album will be "traditional" in the vein of classic PRIEST LPs "British Steel", "Screaming For Vengeance" and "Defenders Of The Faith", Hill clarified: "No, not that traditional. [Laughs] It's more along the lines of 'Invincible Shield', but a lot more direct, shall I say."
More direct (a lot more? more short songs?) and traditional than the last 2 albums, they really found their formula. But I wouldn't call IS different than Firepower and it is direct approach overall. I would like some longer and atypical songs from them.
 
More direct (a lot more?) and traditional than the last 2 albums, they really found their formula. I wouldn't call IS different than Firepower and it is direct approach overall. I would like some longer and atypical songs from them.

Most likely the music will stay very much in the vein of Firepower and Invincible Shield, because Richie has become the main musical architect behind modern Judas Priest. At least that’s how it feels to me.
 
I liked the diversity of Invincible Shield, but I'm curious to hear what they've been cooking :) One thing for sure, they aren't wasting their time. The gap between Firepower and Invincible Shield was quite long (of course, partially thanks to covid), so it's nice to know they want the new record to be out only 3 years after the most recent album. Releasing 20 studio LPs is a rather big achievement for a metal band.
 
Tim Owens talking about the differences between Priest and Maiden. You can definitely sense some undercurrents there.



"After Maiato noted that IRON MAIDEN's current lineup, with Bruce Dickinson on vocals, occasionally performs material that was originally recorded with singer Blaze Bayley, while Rob Halford "rarely performs" Owens-era songs from PRIEST, Tim clarified: "You just said Rob Halford 'rarely performs' it. Rob Halford's never performed [PRIEST songs from my era of the band]. But no, absolutely [think there are songs he would sound great on]. Could you imagine how great Rob Halford would sound singing 'Burn In Hell'? It would be better than my version. He would sound... It's so great for him, he would sound fantastic. Now, I'd like to see him try 'Jugulator', but I don't think that would happen. But, yeah, they would sound fantastic.

"But there's a difference of bands you're talking about," Owens explained. "You're talking about IRON MAIDEN, who has great management. They do great business moves. They're up here [at a higher level than PRIEST when it comes to their live draw]. JUDAS PRIEST, yeah… This is a band that announced they were going to one guitar player [for their live shows] years ago [only to quickly change their minds]. I mean, how the fuck does JUDAS PRIEST go to one guitar player? So you're talking about IRON MAIDEN with great management, great marketing, a great team. They go into the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame. They demand that Blaze Bayley goes into Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame [with the other current and former members of the band]. JUDAS PRIEST goes into the Rock And Hall Hall Of Fame, and JUDAS PRIEST is pretty much, 'Absolutely not, Ripper's not going in.' So [IRON MAIDEN] have great management, and there's a reason why they play in front of 20,000 people and the other one [JUDAS PRIEST] plays in front of five. That's the difference. So there's your answer of why IRON MAIDEN, which is a little more class act, plays Blaze Bayley's songs, 'cause they wrote 'em, they did it. Why would they not?"
*

The way he phrases it, is there a possibility that, behind the scenes, Maiden demanded that Blaze be included in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction?
 
Tim Owens talking about the differences between Priest and Maiden. You can definitely sense some undercurrents there.



"After Maiato noted that IRON MAIDEN's current lineup, with Bruce Dickinson on vocals, occasionally performs material that was originally recorded with singer Blaze Bayley, while Rob Halford "rarely performs" Owens-era songs from PRIEST, Tim clarified: "You just said Rob Halford 'rarely performs' it. Rob Halford's never performed [PRIEST songs from my era of the band]. But no, absolutely [think there are songs he would sound great on]. Could you imagine how great Rob Halford would sound singing 'Burn In Hell'? It would be better than my version. He would sound... It's so great for him, he would sound fantastic. Now, I'd like to see him try 'Jugulator', but I don't think that would happen. But, yeah, they would sound fantastic.

"But there's a difference of bands you're talking about," Owens explained. "You're talking about IRON MAIDEN, who has great management. They do great business moves. They're up here [at a higher level than PRIEST when it comes to their live draw]. JUDAS PRIEST, yeah… This is a band that announced they were going to one guitar player [for their live shows] years ago [only to quickly change their minds]. I mean, how the fuck does JUDAS PRIEST go to one guitar player? So you're talking about IRON MAIDEN with great management, great marketing, a great team. They go into the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame. They demand that Blaze Bayley goes into Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame [with the other current and former members of the band]. JUDAS PRIEST goes into the Rock And Hall Hall Of Fame, and JUDAS PRIEST is pretty much, 'Absolutely not, Ripper's not going in.' So [IRON MAIDEN] have great management, and there's a reason why they play in front of 20,000 people and the other one [JUDAS PRIEST] plays in front of five. That's the difference. So there's your answer of why IRON MAIDEN, which is a little more class act, plays Blaze Bayley's songs, 'cause they wrote 'em, they did it. Why would they not?"
*

The way he phrases it, is there a possibility that, behind the scenes, Maiden demanded that Blaze be included in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction?

Yes he was added because the band asked for. 2 albums with them and saved the band of retiring.
 
Tour start by Priest with an unspectacular setlist (obviously 'Faithkeepers' as a tour name has no deeper meaning)

You've Got Another Thing Comin'
Metal Gods
Breaking the Law
The Ripper
The Sentinel
Desert Plains
Lightning Strike
Turbo Lover
Steeler
Delivering the Goods
Panic Attack
Victim of Changes
Halls of Valhalla
Painkiller

Encore:
(Helion)
Electric Eye
Hell Bent for Leather
Living After Midnight
 
Last edited:
Tour start by Priest with an unspectacular setlist (obviously 'Faithkeepers' as a tour name has no deeper meaning)

You've Got Another Thing Comin'
Metal Gods
Breaking the Law
The Ripper
The Sentinel
Desert Plains
Lightning Strike
Turbo Lover
Steeler
Delivering the Goods
Panic Attack
Victim of Changes
Halls of Valhalla
Painkiller

Encore:
(Helion)
Electric Eye
Hell Bent for Leather
Living After Midnight
Steeler and Delivering the Goods are killer in deep cuts!

I saw Steeler in 2022 but have never seen DTG! Always wanted to
 
IMO it's unscpectacular because 10 of 17 songs were played last year, another five within the last four years and only two songs (DTG & Ripper) last time in 2019. Since the reunion Priest always had a knack for including deep cuts in their set without neglecting the listening habits of the masses. But this time I feel disappointed.
 
1. There should never have been any mention of SWoD or Turbo at all. Generally speaking, if someone had shown me this setlist, say, two years ago and said, “Hey, Judas Priest are going to play this setlist in Europe in 2026,” I would have been like, “Oh, that’s cool.” There are a lot of good songs here. Unfortunately, the band hinted at celebrating the 50th and 40th anniversaries. I don’t think those celebrations are actually happening at all. Sad Wings got two songs, and they’re the most obvious ones. I’ll note that two slots for SWoD aren’t some huge nod to the album, since similar situations have already happened without any anniversaries (2018, 2009, 2004...).

There’s one song from Turbo, and in my opinion, that’s a total failure - it’s hard to even comment on it xD I won’t even mention Reckless, because as you can see, that will forever remain a pipe dream, but this setlist could really use Out in the Cold and Genocide - it would instantly make everything look better. When people heard “Faithkeepers,” they were expecting DotF, and I always said that was a mistake - but honestly, just looking at the tour name itself, it’s easy to see why people would make that connection. And if the band had already decided to give the 1976 and ’86 albums the short end of the stick, they should’ve thrown in another track from Defenders, since they’ve got Jawbreaker right there.

2. At the same time, though, I’m wondering what the hell the big deal is if someone’s bemoaning this setlist, because in my opinion, they picked good songs per se. Repetition is repetition - unfortunately, I figured from the start there’d be plenty of it - but looking at it from a “European perspective”:

- Halls of Valhalla returns after 11 years

- Delivering the Goods and Steeler return after 46 years

So this is a really good deal for those who live in Europe.

At the same time, I think this setlist is still missing 1–2 deep cuts to balance out the hits. There’s Desert Plains, and that’s my all-time favorite Priest song, so I’m super excited at the prospect of hearing it again, but over the last few years this song has been revisited with some regularity, so it’s hard to call it a surprise.

Oh, and at this point Lightning Strike is just embarrassing. Please swap it out for any other song from the Firepower album, because since 2018, Priest hasn’t played anything else from that album here other than LS. There are plenty of other options waiting in the wings, like Necromancer or Traitors Gate. Seriously, there are a few better choices around and they'd make the whole thing much more interesting!

3. The order of these songs in the set is strange. Opening with YGATC sounds like a crazy idea, I don’t get the point of it, and I have no idea what it’s supposed to accomplish. It’s the first track on the new compilation album, and maybe that’s what inspired them, but doing something like this when you’re also playing songs like Electric Eye and Panic Attack (!) is strange, to say the least. Especially since Metal Gods comes right after it, so the first 10 minutes are very mid-tempo. However, I watched a few minutes of the show and YGATC works pretty well as the show opener. But it's just... An odd choice.

As for Panic Attack - to me, that last 25 minutes before the encores sound like a recipe for a vocal nightmare. I don’t know how Rob plans to handle that burden night after night, because it looks absolutely brutal. I watched a few videos, and while VoC was pretty good for the first performance on the tour, I’m at a loss for words regarding yesterday’s performance of Painkiller. The worst performance I’ve ever heard, a total disaster. Remove it from the setlist: they simply shouldn’t be playing it. Not at this stage, and not after so many demanding songs. It’s ridiculous.

4. The stage design has changed a bit; instead of a “painted” backdrop around the stage, there are now some kind of screens. And there's the fork - unfortunately not the one from 2021–2024, but I'm fine with that.

To summarize: the setlist is okay, but it doesn't live up to expectations and is, in fact, below them. It's a cool setlist for a fun concert. There will probably be some changes at the first few shows, we’ll see how it plays out.
 
1. There should never have been any mention of SWoD or Turbo at all. Generally speaking, if someone had shown me this setlist, say, two years ago and said, “Hey, Judas Priest are going to play this setlist in Europe in 2026,” I would have been like, “Oh, that’s cool.” There are a lot of good songs here. Unfortunately, the band hinted at celebrating the 50th and 40th anniversaries. I don’t think those celebrations are actually happening at all. Sad Wings got two songs, and they’re the most obvious ones. I’ll note that two slots for SWoD aren’t some huge nod to the album, since similar situations have already happened without any anniversaries (2018, 2009, 2004...).

There’s one song from Turbo, and in my opinion, that’s a total failure - it’s hard to even comment on it xD I won’t even mention Reckless, because as you can see, that will forever remain a pipe dream, but this setlist could really use Out in the Cold and Genocide - it would instantly make everything look better. When people heard “Faithkeepers,” they were expecting DotF, and I always said that was a mistake - but honestly, just looking at the tour name itself, it’s easy to see why people would make that connection. And if the band had already decided to give the 1976 and ’86 albums the short end of the stick, they should’ve thrown in another track from Defenders, since they’ve got Jawbreaker right there.

2. At the same time, though, I’m wondering what the hell the big deal is if someone’s bemoaning this setlist, because in my opinion, they picked good songs per se. Repetition is repetition - unfortunately, I figured from the start there’d be plenty of it - but looking at it from a “European perspective”:

- Halls of Valhalla returns after 11 years

- Delivering the Goods and Steeler return after 46 years

So this is a really good deal for those who live in Europe.

At the same time, I think this setlist is still missing 1–2 deep cuts to balance out the hits. There’s Desert Plains, and that’s my all-time favorite Priest song, so I’m super excited at the prospect of hearing it again, but over the last few years this song has been revisited with some regularity, so it’s hard to call it a surprise.

Oh, and at this point Lightning Strike is just embarrassing. Please swap it out for any other song from the Firepower album, because since 2018, Priest hasn’t played anything else from that album here other than LS. There are plenty of other options waiting in the wings, like Necromancer or Traitors Gate. Seriously, there are a few better choices around and they'd make the whole thing much more interesting!

3. The order of these songs in the set is strange. Opening with YGATC sounds like a crazy idea, I don’t get the point of it, and I have no idea what it’s supposed to accomplish. It’s the first track on the new compilation album, and maybe that’s what inspired them, but doing something like this when you’re also playing songs like Electric Eye and Panic Attack (!) is strange, to say the least. Especially since Metal Gods comes right after it, so the first 10 minutes are very mid-tempo. However, I watched a few minutes of the show and YGATC works pretty well as the show opener. But it's just... An odd choice.

As for Panic Attack - to me, that last 25 minutes before the encores sound like a recipe for a vocal nightmare. I don’t know how Rob plans to handle that burden night after night, because it looks absolutely brutal. I watched a few videos, and while VoC was pretty good for the first performance on the tour, I’m at a loss for words regarding yesterday’s performance of Painkiller. The worst performance I’ve ever heard, a total disaster. Remove it from the setlist: they simply shouldn’t be playing it. Not at this stage, and not after so many demanding songs. It’s ridiculous.

4. The stage design has changed a bit; instead of a “painted” backdrop around the stage, there are now some kind of screens. And there's the fork - unfortunately not the one from 2021–2024, but I'm fine with that.

To summarize: the setlist is okay, but it doesn't live up to expectations and is, in fact, below them. It's a cool setlist for a fun concert. There will probably be some changes at the first few shows, we’ll see how it plays out.
I felt that painkiller was ok for rob at his 74 and nearly the end of the show. Its imposible to sing that even worst than aces high. I would go to see that show if they come near my city even there is no tipton and Kk downing. Last time i saw them rhey were in thr band
 
Back
Top